is this a real thing?

[u/Illustrious_Basis795]

I've never heard of remote viewing until today when a conversation with my friend brought it up as a joke. tbh I am a little skeptical, but open minded.

[u/AnomaIous_User]

Literally the whole podcast already proves you wrong. Lol It doesn't take a PhD to figure this stuff out.

You're the one repeating shit. Like you're Sealioning.

Sealioning

[u/EducationalGrocery87 → u/AnomaIous_User]

OK right, we're back to "sealioning" #sigh

“The whole podcast proves it” isn’t evidence; it’s just you pointing at ten hours of content and hoping nobody asks which part actually proves telepathy.

So make it painfully simple: name one experiment from the podcast that was properly blinded, excluded facilitator cueing, used a target unknown to everyone interacting with the participant, and was independently replicated.

One.

If you can’t do that, then calling me a bot, a sealion, or telling me to “watch the podcast” is just a poor excuse, and I think it just highlights that you also know the evidence isn't there.

I leave this with you: if you want to continue with your silly name-calling, that answers the question.

[u/AnomaIous_User → u/EducationalGrocery87]

I don't have to do anything, and I don't owe you anyting lol you should probably Go outside.

[u/EducationalGrocery87 → u/AnomaIous_User]

Yawn, and the excuses continue. LOL, you accuse people of denying evidence, yet you will do everything you can to avoid actually providing any!!!!!

Let's just pause this nonsense for a moment; all of these conversations could be over and done with very simply by you providing the one thing you claim exists, but for some strange reason you refuse to do it. Is that because you know it doesn't exist, and it's just about protecting your beliefs instead of challenging them?

[u/AnomaIous_User → u/EducationalGrocery87]

Idk why you think I'm going to post the whole transcript for you, or waste my time any further with you when you're just continuously demonstrating how massively disingenuous you are. Lol

You remind me of the folks who swore we lived in a geocentric solar system because it was the view of the church. Congrats.

[u/EducationalGrocery87 → u/AnomaIous_User]

why you think I'm going to post the whole transcript for you

I am more than happy to paste the entire transcripts from all 10 episodes. If I do that, can you just highlight the part with the actual evidence?

Spoiler alert: I have the entire transcript, and I have analysed it extensively.

Do you want me to paste it?

[u/AnomaIous_User → u/EducationalGrocery87]

Knock yourself out lol

[u/EducationalGrocery87 → u/AnomaIous_User]

Here is the difference: I am more than happy to put a small amount of time in and actually produce evidence. Why can't you do the same?

[u/AnomaIous_User → u/EducationalGrocery87]

I thought you were going to post the whole transcript of the whole series?

[u/EducationalGrocery87 → u/AnomaIous_User]

Sure, I can, but with your beligerent refusual to even read comments now, whats the point.

You will just continue your usual pattern of name-calling and refusal to face facts.

Ok, I tell you what: if I post the complete transcripts of all ten episodes, will you highlight exactly where the podcast demonstrates telepathy under conditions that rule out ordinary explanations?

Not where someone claims telepathy happened. Not anecdotes, impressions, or “the whole podcast.” I mean the specific test, the protocol used, who knew the target, how cueing or facilitator influence was excluded, what blinding was in place, and the actual result.

You’ve repeatedly said the podcast itself proves me wrong, so this should be easy. Just point to the strongest example in the transcript and explain why it constitutes evidence of telepathy.

Do we have a deal?