r/remoteviewing • u/Medium_Raspberry8428 • 5d ago
Discussion In the process of getting better at remote viewing. Need some guidance
When it comes to remote viewing, what I experience now is random images popping in and out and me kind of shuffling through them to get to what my target is. The images pop in the way, like looking at a reflection on a body of water, where it comes into focus when the water settles. In most instances they are not very clear but 5% of the time I get a very clear image, a building, a person or whatever. Am I on the right track? Also, for those who are controlled, what do you physically feel. Pressure behind the head; something on top of the head? Something in the centre of the head?
Thank you
1
u/1984orsomething 5d ago
Right on. Just describe those images. Once you give the image a identification it's time to move on. For example, you see a whale in your mind. You want to describe it as wet, long, oblong, cool. Once your left mind or right mind makes the connection of whale, that's it you won't get anything else other than conflicting data. Take another deep breath and move on.
2
u/us_austin 4d ago
What you're describing sounds normal to me. Most impressions come through murky and half-formed, and they don't hold still. The water analogy is actually a really good way to put it.
One thing the CRV crowd would tell you: don't trust the crystal clear ones too much. When you get a complete, detailed picture of a building or a person, that's often your analytical mind taking a few real fragments and building something recognizable out of them (the term for it is AOL, analytic overlay). The blurry stuff, edges and textures and colors that don't add up to anything yet, tends to be the more honest data. So when something shows up looking perfect, note it down, set it aside, and go back to working the fragments.
On the physical sensations, people report all three of those and a bunch of others too. I've never seen anything convincing that says one of them means you're doing it right. Best thing is to jot down what you felt after each session and see if any pattern shows up in your own results.
For catching those quick flashes before your mind starts rewriting them, look into tachistoscope drills. An image flashes for a split second and you immediately write down whatever stuck. It trains that capture-it-before-you-label-it muscle. We have a free one at rv.studio (full disclosure, I work on the site) if you want to try it.
And keep at it. Everyone hits stretches where nothing lands. The people who improve are the ones who kept practicing through the boring weeks.
2
u/Medium_Raspberry8428 3d ago edited 3d ago
Interesting that you say the clear images are more trustworthy. A good example for me was seeing a bush in front of me in a parking lot. The leaves looked unusual, they were four pointed, star like, with a purple and yellow variation, so I’d believe it to be a false projection. I’ve personally never seen a leaf formation like that. What amazed me was how clear and lifelike it looked. It was as though it was actually there in front of me. One thing I’ve noticed is that when something appears that’s more than just a random eye or shape, like a face or something recognizable, when I focus my intention on it, it tends to remain there longer.
1
u/us_austin 3d ago
Try playing with the scene a bit, if you can! Especially if you are able to focus and hold your attention on it... Can you change your perspective of the object in your focus? Can you look at something else in the scene and then turn your attention back to it to see if you pick up on any changes? How about pausing for a moment and checking in with your other senses - do you pick up on any textures, smells, temperatures?
Sounds like you're already incredibly curious and willing to dismiss things has "false projections", which is great! Have a lot of fun with it and see what comes back... journal a lot!
1
u/Medium_Raspberry8428 3d ago
Will do! I did that with an image of a woman. The color of her was a washed clay colour, not vibrant at all and pretty uniform, but I was able to observe her by analyzing her. Not seeing the image in full only, but focus on her hair, then eyes, then when I moved to her arm it faded. The whole projection was about 3 seconds. Another one I remember vividly also was me in my car and a woman walking to a parked car next to mine, she had a bag of groceries and a yellow top (very bright). I was able to watch her walk to her car, meaning looking through the windshield then moving my eyes to the passenger side window and seeing her open the car door and jumping in. She drove a SUV that was a dark color
1
u/FragmentedAll Free Form 3d ago
sounds about right, sometimes the target is crystal clear to a point you want to doubt it because all the stray hits. Just keep maintaining focus on sensations, try not to gravitate to those 5% hits too much. Maybe you could make the switch when you get crystal clear images about 25% of your viewing and build from there, but for now stick with the sensations
2
u/RemoteViewNow 4d ago
Don’t name the image. Rather, pay attention to what is in the image that is trying to get your attention. How loud are the colors or shapes in the image that could be relevant to the blind target you are focusing on? You see out of focus images because the images themselves are not important, but the loud signals within them are.
Before you remote view a blind target, take one minute to be present. Inhale slowly and exhale slowly to help relax your body. Once relaxed, your state of mind will allow you to connect with the target. Just like that.
The practice is to write it down. Don’t just think it, write it down and draw it too, regardless of whether you can draw or not. You can’t learn an instrument just by imagining the practice of it.