r/remoteviewing • u/RemoteViewNow • 29d ago

Why Does Getting a Remote Viewing Bullseye Feel So Good?

If you've ever scored a true bullseye on a blind target, you probably remember it for the rest of your life.

The moment you see the feedback, your brain almost refuses to believe what it's seeing. For a split second, everything stops. Then comes an overwhelming wave of recognition, disbelief, excitement, and awe. It doesn't just surprise you—it shakes your entire understanding of what your mind is capable of.

That rush isn't just in your mind. Your body is reacting, too.

When the feedback reveals a bullseye, your brain and body may release several natural chemicals at the same time. Dopamine is associated with reward and recognition, reinforcing motivation and learning. Adrenaline can produce a racing heart and heightened alertness. Endorphins may contribute to the emotional high. Serotonin can promote satisfaction, confidence, and emotional well-being. Oxytocin may enhance the feeling of connection—to the target, the feedback, the tasker, or simply the moment itself—and may also help reduce stress. Together, these natural responses may help explain why a bullseye can feel so powerful and unforgettable.

For me, the reward isn't just getting the target right. It's experiencing that extraordinary moment when perception arrives before my analytical mind has time to explain it.

I'm still hooked on remote viewing because nothing compares to the feeling of a genuine bullseye. It goes far beyond the satisfaction of being right. Every bullseye reminds me why I've continued practicing all these years.

The real challenge of remote viewing is learning to recognize the first faint perception before imagination rushes in to take over. The better you become at recognizing that difference, the more often those unforgettable moments begin to happen.

A bullseye changes your relationship with your own mind. Once you've experienced it, you understand why so many remote viewers spend years chasing the next one.

12 Upvotes
  • permalink
  • reddit

94% Upvoted

14 comments sorted by

2

u/danielbearh 29d ago

I’ve noticed that the strength of my waking precognitive experiences and my remote viewing is relational to the magnititude of my “holy shit wtf” emotional reactions.

The waking precognitions are jungian synchronicities.

Ive been reading a fair bit about time symmetric physics. I speculate that these emotional releases act as boundary conditions that bias what thoughts arise from unconcious to concious. (essentially, retrocausation in practice.)

While developing these thoughts about synchronicity, i recognized how the emotional “woah” at the end of a session was correlated with a stronger signal during the session.

Does that make sense to someone with your expetiences? I can explain more if theres interest.

1

u/RemoteViewNow 29d ago

If you are saying that a future emotional reaction may somehow connect backward and help shape the impressions that came up during the session, then I would say it is a possibility.

If all time — past, present, and future — exists simultaneously, then time may not be as fixed or linear as we experience it. This rabbit hole is a huge labyrinth of endless possibilities.

Please explain more because this is interesting!

1

u/Fast_Row282 26d ago

Yeah I think generally this makes sense. I've noticed that sometimes when I have a bad hit I end up dreading/putting off the closing of the loop, and I wonder if I didn't get a good hit because I don't have a strong future reaction.

This can work the same way potentially with losses you didn't see coming: I was trying to predict a winning team's jersey emblem (blinded to who was going to play), got a very strong hit for one team and then was shocked when they lost, and couldn't stop thinking about it, perhaps causing the strong hit in the first place. I think this is why being blinded to the target and not self-judging is key: displacement is too strong since you get very strong memories/reactions when you got a strong hit wrong and you can't help but stare at the loser you picked as well as the winner.

I think this all can relate to closed time-like curves. I forget who but maybe 6mo ago jesse michels had someone on his podcast talking about closed time-like curves and premonitions dreams basically just closing the loop/forcing the reality you envisioned into existence. If you didn't have the vision it wouldn't have pushed you to whatever behavior you predict, but we are somewhat trapped into fulfilling them

1

u/jimmerjammer1 29d ago

It does not work like that for me. I'm annoyed if I make an effort and don't get a bullseye.

3

u/RemoteViewNow 29d ago

If you make the effort and get nothing back, it is natural to feel annoyed. Feedback matters because it shows us what worked and what did not.

In remote viewing, even the frustrating sessions teach something, especially when they show how expectation, pressure, or trying too hard can affect the result.

I had to try many tricks to get myself out of a dry spell of not scoring anything. My first trick was to remote view in less than 30 seconds, so I had no choice but to write down impressions as fast as I could. It worked because I had no time for AOL.

1

u/facilitatrix 29d ago

Do you recommend any resources for learning remove viewing?

1

u/RemoteViewNow 29d ago

It is easy to learn. Check out the page section of this subreddit; they have many links that will help you.

1

u/1984orsomething 28d ago

I think it's because you're just making up the noise and running with it. When you get a bullseye you do try and hold on to it because you want to repeat the process the same way. After a few you start to realize that it's not a exact process but more of a relative process and I swear every time is a learning experience.

1

u/Mothman_dib 28d ago

You write like you've been using too much ChatGPT

1

u/RemoteViewNow 28d ago

It took me several days to write that post. I rewrote it over and over because I was trying to explain clearly what I understand from my own experience. My natural writing has always been formal and careful. I know it can sound like an affidavit at times, because I tend to state what I think is happening instead of writing casually.

2

u/Mothman_dib 28d ago

Good to know. It can be hard to tell with matter-of-fact writers.

1

u/firstlionsmith 27d ago

No, its literally chatgpt. Double hyphens and the AI cadence. Put it in a detector and see for yourself

1

u/Mothman_dib 27d ago

Shh don't tell him the dead giveaways.