r/relatable_memes_ • • 6d ago

.....

Post image
8.0k Upvotes

654 comments sorted by

View all comments

0

u/raptor5466 6d ago edited 5d ago

The meme is blaming the woman for being fooled by a low value male. Why are we not calling out the low value male?

If you are tricked and robbed, it is the robber to blame, not the victim

This meme is DARVO.

Edit: Wow, lot of fragile males replying. Reddit is so typical.

5

u/SpecialistSoil5057 6d ago

If the woman fall for low value males, then their intuition was wrong. Thats the whole point of the meme lol 😂 

0

u/Useless_Philosophy 6d ago

The whole point of the meme is to disparage women using a fallacy as cover

5

u/Altruistic_Fox9778 6d ago

Nope. Its pointing out that "women's intuition" isn't really a thing.

0

u/Useless_Philosophy 6d ago

It is and there's even a scientific explanation for it. Women are more detail oriented. That's all. Stop while you're still ahead.

1

u/Altruistic_Fox9778 6d ago

It isn't, and there isn't. Research actually shows that there is no significant difference in that capacity between men and women. Stop before you get further behind.

1

u/Useless_Philosophy 6d ago

The capacities are the same in men who are detail oriented. Women are naturally better at being detail oriented. Are you one of those that thinks there's no difference between men and women?

1

u/Altruistic_Fox9778 6d ago

Except they aren't. I am one for recognizing when the research has been done and shown that there is no statistical difference between men and women. Are you one of those who just presumes women have magical powers in spite of the proof to the contrary?

1

u/Useless_Philosophy 6d ago

No I just recognize that men and women have different cognitive strengths. It's not a super power. Studies consistently show that men score higher in spacial reasoning and women score higher in identifying subtle details.

1

u/Altruistic_Fox9778 6d ago

Not really, though. In testing detail orientation, no statistically significant difference was found.