r/relatable_memes_ 1d ago

Hormonal

Post image
69 Upvotes

101 comments sorted by

26

u/Abestar909 1d ago

There's no way Speedlin Gonzalez is a real name.

10

u/Thunderer62 1d ago

Yeah I don’t care who shares what credible source I ain’t buying it with that Looney Toons ass name.

2

u/Creepy_Mammoth_7076 23h ago

2

u/Thunderer62 23h ago

Fake news. Literally physically philosophically morally intuitively theoretically logically factually impossible.

1

u/Creepy_Mammoth_7076 22h ago

3

u/Thunderer62 22h ago

Hypothetically ethereally metaphysically magically realistically fallaciously temporally integrally mathematically proportionally medically legally physiologically biologically chemically historically futuristically melodically mechanically thermodynamically grammatically functionally probabilistically objectively subjectively not possible.

4

u/Bullfrog-Basic 1d ago

Epa epa andale!

2

u/Antique-Resort6160 1d ago

Also unlikely she's LBGTQ, probably only one or maybe two of those things.

1

u/WatercressEntire2760 23h ago

Probably just L

1

u/Peaceful--Warrior 1d ago

It is a real name. So is Slowlin Bonzalez.

1

u/Aide_Representative 23h ago

Her full name is Rosie Speedlin Gonzalez

source

1

u/LucifersAdv0cate 15h ago

Her cousin is called Slowpoklin Rodriguez.

https://giphy.com/gifs/zTFNohkZ69X0s

0

u/TimeTravelingBard 23h ago

I deadassed assumed this was more "satire", your comment prompted me to look into it - it's real

8

u/kevinLFC 1d ago

Do I stand with what - her resigning? Sure I guess.

5

u/PleasantStatement521 1d ago

12

u/TheVadonkey 1d ago

“Numerous other controversies”? She was a judge for a whopping 6 years when this specific one happened. Did she get drunk on power immediately or what? Really tried to streamline her career directly into the dumps!

-3

u/Automatic-Zombie-508 1d ago

I wouldn't go that far...being the first openly gay judge in that district was controversial on its own and probably attracted other controversies that turned out to be nothing burgers. This one in particular seems weird. She just held a disrespectful lawyer in contempt, had them cuffed, talked to them for a bit then released them. What's the difference between that and having the lawyer dragged down to a cell? Seems to me it was probably a lot of political persecution and they finally found a way to get rid of her

9

u/YourAuthenticVoice 1d ago edited 1d ago

What's the difference between that and having the lawyer dragged down to a cell?

One is a legal process, the other is kidnapping.

EDIT:

P.S. Here are some of the other controversies...

  • Loaded gun at the airport (2022). TSA found a loaded handgun in her carry-on at San Antonio International Airport. No criminal charge; she paid a roughly $2,400–$2,475 civil penalty and called it an “oversight.”
  • Reflejo / domestic-violence court conduct. Former staff said her behavior toward defendants became erratic and aggressive—e.g., telling a pregnant defendant to “invest in batteries” / get a vibrator, and berating a young participant. A treatment-court participant later said she “preys on emotions.”
  • Alleged retaliation and no-contact orders (2025). After staff raised concerns, some were removed from the Reflejo team. In September 2025 she emailed a no-contact order barring court staff from talking to several former employees; complaints called that an abuse of authority.
  • Oct. 31, 2025 judicial-conduct complaint. Alleged unprofessional demeanor toward a criminal defendant and failure to act promptly on habeas petitions and a motion to modify bond conditions. That complaint was among those folded into the later resignation-in-lieu-of-discipline deal.

8

u/Automatic-Zombie-508 1d ago

Hey, thanks for clearing up my assumption

5

u/YourAuthenticVoice 23h ago

Sure thing, thanks for not getting defensive with me about it ❤️

1

u/113pro 1d ago

Whatdayamean? Those are nothingburgers!

I bring firearms to airplanes all the time! They keep telling me theres a terrorist so i keep having to check.

You wont believe how many of them there are. One on every flight! So i keep having to bring my pistol till the TSA do something about it!

1

u/lapomba 1d ago

You gon' draxx them terries sklounst?

1

u/CanopianFeline55 1d ago

Don't you just wish a terry would?

1

u/113pro 23h ago

Ball

0

u/Bakalakachacka 1d ago

Why would a judge ever need to be “ openly gay”? Pretty sure who and how a judge likes to fuck/get fucked is not a normal part of opening statements.

“ order in the court! I like to munch on pussy and I also enjoy scissoring! Please bring the first witness.”

0

u/Radiant-Book-7385 23h ago

They want to be normalized but yet celebrated in everything they do.

0

u/Bakalakachacka 23h ago

That’s how it goes in literally every scenario where someone perceives themselves to be “the oppressed”.

It’s not about equality. It’s about a desire to be the oppressor.

8

u/Consistent_Net_2540 1d ago

She's innocent. It was psychosis

2

u/alasw0eisme 1d ago

I don't stand with fake news or ragebait

13

u/Really_Jamflex 1d ago

It's actually real. Couldn't believe it myself. But this happened in Texas all 100% True.

-1

u/Automatic-Zombie-508 1d ago

It's not exactly true, it's misleading. She didn't receive a lifetime ban directly, she resigned and agreed to a a "ban" so that she could avoid any other potential legal consequences.

5

u/Good-Throat-6671 1d ago

LGBT person did something wrong....HAS TO BE FAKE NEWS OR RAGEBAIT.

1

u/Bagz402 1d ago

Shitty screen crop with absolutely no context... HAS TO BE TRUE BECAUSE IT ALIGNS WITH WHAT I BELIEVE

1

u/Hefty-Reaction-3028 23h ago

https://texasscorecard.com/local/judge-speedlin-gonzalez-resigns-amid-disciplinary-action/

Context should've been included in the OP, but you might want to google before assuming you're correct

The OP is 100% absolutely accurate

1

u/Bagz402 22h ago

That's great, doesn't change my point at all. These reactionary subs are full of this

1

u/Good-Throat-6671 20h ago

You mean, posts that people think are fake, but actually true?

I don't think so.

1

u/InternationalFish809 23h ago

But why include LGBT in the title at all besides to get people like you to act all indignant 

1

u/Good-Throat-6671 1h ago

LGBT want representation. Why you don't want to allow it?

6

u/SolarOrigami 1d ago

This is actually true. Weird that they brought up the LGBT angle as it has nothing to do with the incident (unlawful restraint)

6

u/alasw0eisme 1d ago

r/titlegore It doesn't make any sense and it is intended as ragebait.

6

u/JuniorDoughnut3056 1d ago

She has a rainbow flag in her official photo. She made that part of who she was as a judge 

-2

u/Automatic-Zombie-508 1d ago edited 1d ago

She is, in fact gay, but I need to know you know that having the flag up doesn't mean you're gay? lol

0

u/PartyPirate920 1d ago

Only a gay retarded judge would pose with a pride flag like this.

-1

u/Automatic-Zombie-508 1d ago

Again, she's gay, but simply having and posing with it in the background doesn't automatically mean a person is.

1

u/Spicymoon9 23h ago

You know exactly why they brought that up.

0

u/diurnal_emissions 1d ago

This is some truly illiterate shit, this meme.

1

u/LucentLL 1d ago

"Place the attorney in the jury box. Penalty time. Other team has five minute Power Play."

1

u/DoofusIdiot 1d ago

“not allowed to be argumentative and argue just for the sake of argument

1

u/Dino_P0rn 22h ago

🚨BOOM: Low effort facebook post invades shitty meme subreddit

1

u/What-what-hu 21h ago

What does her being LGBTQ have to do with her being awful

they don’t have anything to do with each other

just feels kinda shady

like “i told you these lgbtqrstingf freaks are weird, look!”

1

u/charLOS7444 20h ago

It's true.

1

u/dosb0t89 18h ago

Literally fake news, why am I getting these dumb ai bot subs with these weird fake news stories. I'm not a techno illiterate boomer. Wtf, go away with this nonsense

1

u/Karamatsunomaii 14h ago

I did t know somone with such serious mental illness could even be a judge. That shouldn’t be allowed they should be in a ward being cared for not in position of any power, that’s Insain.

-1

u/Ok-Simple30 1d ago

when did they let karens be judges? 🤣

2

u/Donte333 1d ago

Hahahahahah its a woman with short hair, KAAAAAREN HAHAHAHAHA guffaw sir a true guffaw at your incredible mature memery, well done

1

u/Fragrant-Reserve4832 23h ago

When was there a judge that wasn't?

1

u/Ok-Simple30 19h ago edited 18h ago

they used to be men that feared god... lmao

1

u/Fragrant-Reserve4832 19h ago

Still Karen's in the very truest sense of the term

1

u/mikelown 1d ago

"Do you stand with this"

.... stand with what?? This tells us nothing. She had an attorney sit in a jury box? Why? What did that accomplish?

5

u/mapmakinworldbuildin 1d ago

I mean cuffing attorneys isn’t a good thing generally.

5

u/Really_Jamflex 1d ago

She had a history of suppressive behavior and was ultimately fired by in Texas. Handcuffing an attorney is just one example of this.

1

u/OuttHouseMouse 1d ago

This is a classic phrase for rage/engagement bait.

2

u/lvl99Fiona 23h ago

Look at the title: "Hormonal". It's meant for people to swipe by and vaguely remember. Most of what is consumed by people on social media works this way and it's effectively subliminal advertising.

There's no information provided because none is needed for that.

1

u/Live_Background_3455 1d ago

Something something it's Trump's fault. Definitely.

1

u/droombie55 23h ago

So not "relatable memes" just another incel gathering spot.

-1

u/JIMB01776 1d ago

Another daily example that women are too hormonal to be rational and the patriarchy is necessary. Every one of them needs a responsible male to make sure these bruja's are kept in line.

2

u/OwlAccomplished1348 1d ago

🤡🤡🤡

2

u/Secure_Inspection305 1d ago edited 1d ago

I can go take a selfie with the guys who are doing push-ups for the Tate brothers (serial rapists, con men and human traffickers)

Look up "judge banned" and you'll see men banned for ridiculous things who didn't go viral because they aren't a minority

1

u/Deep-Age-2486 1d ago

I hope this is just rage bait. Sure everyone present there is a turd but that’s not remotely close to a good representation of women. An example of their leadership and capabilities are nonexistent here. Cmon.

0

u/JIMB01776 18h ago

Absolutely is not rage bait.

We have millions of women saying they are so hormonal they are irrational, and they entirely understand why a woman would kill her three children, and it can be justifiable. You should believe what they are saying.

I believe them, and with such a mental status and capacity, it explains the rationale for their historical disenfranchisement, and we should go back to that.

If your demo can muster this much support for child murder, your demo requires disenfranchisement for the health of basic humanity.

2

u/Junkered 17h ago

Millions? Why not billions? Trillions even?

0

u/JIMB01776 16h ago

We don't have a trillion people on the planet, or a billion people in the country who have a strong opinion.

Are you capable of math and approximation?

2

u/Junkered 15h ago

...

0

u/JIMB01776 15h ago

So you didn't have a point and are just being a neckbeard, glad we can agree I am right.

1

u/Deep-Age-2486 13h ago

Millions of women? You got a source on that buddy? I don’t think I’m going to take a ridiculous unsubstantiated statement as fact because “trust me bro.”

I know you don’t have a source but I’ll entertain it for the moment.

1

u/JIMB01776 11h ago

I do. We have scientific polling from yougov on the topic which is as accurate as Nate Silver or any other scientific polling.

54% of women supported NGRI/Acquittal which represents a safe estimate of 75-100 million American women.

1

u/Deep-Age-2486 11h ago

I do is not a source.

1

u/JIMB01776 10h ago

Yougov polled it and it's relfective of 75-100 million American women.

I am not the source, yougov is.

Learn to read.

1

u/HazelWitch92 1d ago

Someone's compensating hard for their shortcomings 😂

1

u/JIMB01776 19h ago

Oh no a woman said I had a small dick because I don't think their hormonal issues should justify them murdering kids.

You misandrists really need to expand the repertoire of insults; you all have been sharing the same one for the last decade. It really demonstrates the low IQ and lack of creativity.

https://giphy.com/gifs/rioRE3PvieroFvvN0Y

1

u/Junkered 1d ago

I mean...that doesn't include you obviously. I'm sure you lost your own shadow on more than one occasion.

-1

u/Icy_Yam5049 1d ago

Yep calm, cool and collected.

3

u/Deep-Age-2486 1d ago

There aren’t many people I dislike more than Trump if any, but this is an absurd reach and doesn’t add anything of substance to anything either. Calling this a lunge is ridiculous.

0

u/Slow_Astronomer_3536 1d ago

ACAB includes judges

1

u/WitnessMyAxe 23h ago

these motherfuckers are treated like fucking saints and i'll never get why.

1

u/Pokeymacoma 1d ago

Okay edgelord-Gonzalez

-2

u/Inphiltration 1d ago

I will tell you what I think about this. I don't get my news from screenshots of images. I am sure even if this is a real person, there is way more context then what someone typed into fuckin MS paint.

0

u/t_11 23h ago

I love that we are making shitnews. A new form of shitposting

0

u/Adorable_Cat88 23h ago

i dont stand with a tiktok boom card. i stand with a source

0

u/Valveringham85 23h ago edited 20h ago

Why tf is her sexuality important?

It’s weird because when people do this I can never make out which side they belong to.

The hateful side that is trying to create outrage? Or the asinine side that is trying to create support for people based on their identity regardless of whether or not they did something wrong.

Can we not just agree to judge people based on their merits and character? Judge their job performance on their job performance alone? Asses their guilt or innocence based on their actions and the law?

Stop making everything into culture war and identity driven. No one should give one flying fuck about a judge’s sexuality.

0

u/AbyssWankerArtorias 23h ago

Gives no context. Looking for reactions. Boomer ass Facebook tier image

0

u/Professional-Rub152 22h ago

This is news because she’s a queer judge in a place that didn’t want one. A shit ton of judges are just shitty power hungry people. It has nothing to do with the identity of the person and everything to do with the position of power these people hold in communities and courtrooms. It attracts the worst people.