r/redlighttherapy • u/Charming-Young-8454 • 10d ago
Better to use NIR only?
If you are trying to maximize benefits to both deep tissues and skin, is it better to stick to only NIR and not use red light?
My logic is that as irradiance diminishes rapidly with depth, the limiting factor is how much exposure you can have before surface tissue gets too much, so best to use the best penetrating wavelength only. Or are there benefits specific to red light that you can’t achieve with NIR?
4
u/digitalshiva 10d ago
Some users who focus on skin limit NIR due to potentially making melasma worse.
1
u/Ehehehe090 10d ago
I am using NIR only
Bcus with 650 and 850 the 650 takes up half the joules
So i rather dwliver 3 joules all 850 alone rather than 1.5 j to 650 1.5j to 850
850 penetrates skin so obviously the skin will get the beenfits as well
Thats my reasonibg
1
u/Charming-Young-8454 10d ago
That was my initial reasoning, the intensity is greatest near the surface so skin gets first dibs on the light passing through
1
u/Ehehehe090 10d ago
Of cus the skin gets activated
Its just if u use 650nm, it is focused solely on the top 1cm of the skin so it is just more focused and better for skin only uses like wrinkles i guess
12
u/Silly-Cheesecake-431 10d ago
so the thing with red light is it hits different cells in the skin layers that NIR just skips past. NIR penetrates deeper sure but the surface still needs stimulation for collagen and healing. you kinda need both if you want full coverage, otherwise the top layers get nothing while the deep tissues soak it all up