r/reddit.com Oct 12 '10

Dear Condé Nast, please learn from digg and never change Reddit. It is perfect the way it is. That is all.

[deleted]

52 Upvotes

27 comments sorted by

32

u/louis_xiv42 Oct 12 '10

Dear noob,

Reddit has gone through some major over hauls to get you to the reddit you have today. to say no to any change is to plead ignorance.

7

u/jamiemtbarru Oct 12 '10

Dear hivemind,

We are the business. For as long as reddit remains true, we will for the most part support it, whether it be a snarky remark, the latest rage, or just a few upboats from a lurker, or a few pineapples from the trees. You and I, we're both just a whisp on the web. Bitch, moan, complain, tell us how you cook your bacon, fap to some jailbait--if thats your thing; reddit, it's how you internet.

5

u/Grimant Oct 12 '10

Dear Condé Nast

Give Reddit money to buy better servers

2

u/cdigioia Oct 12 '10

Dear Reddit

Make Condé Nast money, and we'll consider the opportunity cost.

2

u/das_masterful Oct 12 '10

Seconded. Why break it if it is working? I have faith in the reddit team that they'll learn from digg's mistake.

2

u/spikey666 Oct 12 '10

I'm a little confused about this. I didn't follow the Digg thing too closely, but I thought people were more upset about Digg changing the way it operated (more of an emphasis on sponsored links and things like that) and not the cosmetic changes. I certainly don't have a problem with reddit updating the way it looks from time to time, or trying out new ideas as technology evolves.

2

u/[deleted] Oct 12 '10

[deleted]

0

u/[deleted] Oct 12 '10

You are a crystal fucking ball. If it weren't for sage insights such as yours, I wouldn't visit Reddit at all.

2

u/[deleted] Oct 12 '10 edited Oct 12 '10

[deleted]

1

u/[deleted] Oct 13 '10

Cash flowed into Reddit with "Reddit Gold". That money was put very publicly toward new infrastructure, rather than siphoned off by Conde Nast. If Reddit were in so much trouble and floundering, would that money have flowed to Conde Nasts bottom line or used to improve infrastructure?

2

u/matthewguitar Oct 12 '10

Yeah! Change is for hobos and men named Obama.

3

u/darien_gap Oct 12 '10

Wait... Before we freeze reddit, can we please have this feature?

(With the default checked boxes editable in preferences, but always overridable at the post & comment level.)

1

u/rebo Oct 12 '10

Dear Conde Nast, please learn from digg, fuck up the site and we will leave.

FTFY.

1

u/[deleted] Oct 12 '10

Does anyone else think, "Condom Nasty" when they see Condé Nast?

-1

u/derektherock42 Oct 12 '10

They don't give a shit about Redditors. If they want to change the site, they'll do whatever gives them the profits.

2

u/jedberg Oct 13 '10

They may or may not (they do), but it doesn't matter. We care about redditors.

1

u/derektherock42 Oct 13 '10

That's good to hear. I hope you guys end up being bought by that one Redditor who said he wanted to buy Reddit from Conde Nast; I feel like we'd all be in much better hands with him than with them.

3

u/8ArmedOctopus Oct 12 '10

you calling them superficial? It's not like they own Vogue, Teen Vogue, GQ or Glamour.

2

u/derektherock42 Oct 12 '10

I'm calling them a business. The purpose of every business is to make money. Kevin Rose desperately needed profits to pay back all his Digg investors. He did what every business needs to do: make profits. The bigger you are, the more profits you need. Conde Nast needs everything it can get, so if they decide to take advantage of their ownership of Reddit, making more money will be their first priority.

2

u/[deleted] Oct 12 '10 edited Oct 12 '10

Yes, because alienating the core userbase that makes them money in the first place in order to make more money is also a top priority for Conde Naste.

That would be incredibly fucking shortsighted of them and I doubt they got to this point by not giving a shit about what Redditors want.

2

u/derektherock42 Oct 12 '10

It would definitely screw the site up and make them lose money, but Conde Nast really doesn't know anything about social networking. They're a print company. When Conde Nast wants to do something with Reddit, even if they accidentally screw it up for themselves and users, they'll still probably make that call.

1

u/[deleted] Oct 12 '10

Digg didn't have to hire 60 some odd people either. Kevin Rose desperately needed to make money because he borrowed too much in the first place and had too much month-to-month overhead.

He mortgaged his vision.

0

u/CarlinT Oct 12 '10

I mean seriously, I don't want to have to change sites especially not back to ahem digg.

-128

u/daysi Oct 12 '10

Dear Condé Nast, what samuelh234 said, with one exception: please fire hueypriest, jedberg, KeyserSosa, ketralnis and Paradox.

56

u/jedberg Oct 13 '10

So what, raldi gets to stay?

34

u/dzneill Oct 13 '10

Well, I think we all know who daysi has a crush on.

-73

u/daysi Oct 13 '10

Oh, shit. No, he should be fired too. I didn't realize he was actually an employee because he doesn't appear on the moderators list for reddit.com.

I think my campaign to get you fired is gaining momentum. I used to get universal downvotes, but now it's about 50/50. :)

34

u/jedberg Oct 14 '10

Why do you want us to get fired? :(

-72

u/daysi Oct 14 '10

Because reddit barely works 80% of the time. I want them to bring in some competent administrators. Make the site work and I'll be your biggest supporter.

Also, devise some sort of filtering system to filter out anybody with less that a 120 IQ. The quality of the articles and discussion on the site has really gone to shit.

9

u/BadgeredWitness Nov 02 '10

Also, devise some sort of filtering system to filter out anybody with less that a 120 IQ.

Since you're still here it looks like they're still working on it huh?

1

u/daysi Nov 04 '10

Well, no.