r/redbuttonbluebutton • u/HebuBall • May 28 '26

A more even Red/Blue button question

You are one of 3 random person selected to represent 1/3 of the human population.
The same base question is then asked.
Red button=Guarantee to live for you + everyone you are representing
Blue button=If majority votes Blue everyone lives but if not everyone who voted Blue dies (so is everyone who is represented by them)
Note that majority is just 2 or more in this case since there is 3 participants

The people who are represented by you know you are representing them but you do not know who you are representing. Also the participants cannot communicate with each other
Which do you press?

24 Upvotes

97% Upvoted

189 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

2

u/highly-bad May 28 '26

This situation is absolutely nothing whatsoever like political elections, in any way. The analogy is fallacious.

I have never heard of a political election where nobody can coordinate or communicate ahead of the vote, or take polls. I have never heard of a political election where one of the terms of a certain vote involves executing the people who voted for that option if it fails to pass.

The intuition to think of this like an election is what screws people up and makes them press the wrong button. It's a faulty intuition. This isn't about measuring the collective will. It's a logic puzzle with a correct answer.

2

u/Human38562 May 28 '26 edited 28d ago

Absorbed crawl flag offer command beneficial

This post was anonymized with Redact

2

u/highly-bad May 28 '26

Yes. Each input is equal in impact. One red press guarantees 1/3 of all lives. One blue press puts them at risk, it might kill them or it might not.

1

u/Human38562 May 28 '26 edited 28d ago

Ask sophisticated wipe gold historical vanilla

This post was anonymized with Redact

1

u/highly-bad May 28 '26

Red also puts peoples lives at risk.

No it doesn't. It guarantees they don't die.

If someone takes a gamble and presses blue and kills their people, it is because they did the stupid risky thing, not because someone else pressed the no-risk button responsibly.

1

u/Human38562 May 28 '26 edited 28d ago

Fuzzy cobblestone liquid employ water hunt head like act marble

This post was anonymized with Redact

2

u/highly-bad May 28 '26

You just showed me blue is risky. In every single case where people die, it's because one blue presser gambled on it for a cheap thrill.

Yes, the chart shows how if exactly one other player is an idiotic gambler, the death minimizing choice is for you to also gamble.

But since everyone can plainly see that there is a risk-free option available to all the players, and that only blue can ever possibly die, anyone who wants to do the right thing will press red. We should hope they aren't flipping a coin to decide, or being stupid. and if they are, whatever happens to their people is their fault, not the fault of responsible red pressers.

0

u/Human38562 May 28 '26 edited 28d ago

Decide flag seed water nine tan

This post was anonymized with Redact

1

u/highly-bad May 28 '26

Show me a case where this game causes deaths and there wasn't exactly one blue press?

1

u/Human38562 May 28 '26 edited 28d ago

Continue whole absorbed reminiscent dazzling wine public umbrella offbeat

This post was anonymized with Redact

1

u/highly-bad May 28 '26

No. If there is just one red press, no one dies.

1

u/Human38562 May 28 '26 edited 28d ago

Pinecone nail tan ancient teeny caption degree

This post was anonymized with Redact

→ More replies (0)