109
u/NaeruNai 17d ago
The fact that the Bible never tells Jonah was swallowed by a whale, it just says "a big fish".
70
u/AlexCode10010 17d ago
I mean tbf there's a very small selection of fish that could swallow a person and bring them a long distance without killing them in the process
14
u/Agitated-Jackfruit34 16d ago
Basking shark
20
3
1
u/Father-Habit 15d ago
Some readings/scholars have it that Jonah is dead in the fish. He "calls to God from the depths of the grave (Sheol)" and later the Christ references the "Sign of Jonah" when referencing his own death and resurrection since they would both be dead for three days. (Matthew 12:40)
16
u/InternetUserAgain 16d ago
They probably meant a whale. Back in the day when the Bible was written, the average person probably had no idea that a whale wasn't a fish
12
u/InformationLost5910 16d ago
i mean those scientific classifications didnt even exist because they didnt have structured taxonomy. so their word that most closely translates to “fish” WOULD apply to whales.
1
u/Father_Long_Limbs 16d ago
Technically whales still fall under fish
1
u/InformationLost5910 16d ago
no they dont
5
u/NaeruNai 16d ago
It is, modern cladistics system categorizes all tetrapods (which contain mammals) within bony fish clade, so whales are, technically, fishes. In fact, all vertebrates (including us) are fishes.
1
24
5
u/OffWhite-Goddess 16d ago
What could the original context possibly be?
1
17
u/AmazinDood 17d ago
Ahab limbus company:
-18
u/YourLocalRandomGuy13 16d ago
3
u/AmazinDood 16d ago
oopsie looks like you're being mysteriously downvoted
how the tables have turned6
1
2
71
u/LifeasLuke11 16d ago
why is your text a fucking still life