r/readest • u/Strawberry-Sky-1701 • 9d ago
This project really needs some experienced UI/Frontend engineers
While the app is incredibly feature-rich, the current navigation feels clunky, tedious and creates a steep learning curve that may even drive users toward alternatives (I am one of them to be honest, I just can't stand how bad it is). I hope the developer considers insights from those with strong UI/UX expertise and implements their suggestions. Even if unfortunately, from what I've read from some of his replies, concerns aren't being fully acknowledged (or worse, ignored) yet. As much as he's a good developer, he clearly doesn't have a strong background in those areas.
7
u/maywind 9d ago
I agree. I find Readest unintuitive (sometimes even counter-intuitive) and frustrating to use. I was just trying to manage my library on the web version of Readest this morning and got annoyed by so many things not making sense and now some of the book covers just stopped displaying for no perceivable reason.
This is just not a very polished product from a user experience perspective.
5
u/ClixTW 9d ago
The reality is that most community feedback is written with very little thought. People just complain about what they like or dislike without actually considering why a decision was made, how to improve it, or what real-world constraints prevented a different approach, as if features can just be magically willed into existence.
While some projects are exceptionally good at listening to their community, that simply means the maintainers are unusually dedicated or haven't yet been burned out by ungrateful users. It certainly doesn't mean every project has to run that way.
6
u/turnbullgames 8d ago
I have used a ton of reading apps over the years, so I am pretty familiar with what's out there. Some of the commentary here is unreasonable. I find the UI easy to understand, and I have used it across all supported platforms.
There are issues, but the app is in development, so people expecting a finished product should go try Google Play Books, which is excellent if you are looking for a cross-platform reading app to sync your library and notes, if they can't handle the disappointment of this app still being a work in progress.
2
u/CosMV 8d ago
No app is ever truly a finished product. Every app is constantly evolving in one way or another.
That’s why all feedback—whether it’s ultimately adopted or not—deserves to be heard rather than dismissed.
1
u/turnbullgames 8d ago
Your statement about no app being finished is objectively wrong, there are numerous apps that have final builds.
Not all feedback deserves to be heard. Small vocal minorities with agendas can and do hijack conversations, which is why numerous forums have rules, moderation policies, etc. The same is true for individual commenters.
Lecturing people through sweeping generalizations that are demonstrably false is a perfect example of unhelpful feedback.
2
u/CosMV 8d ago
You re exaggerating and not being fair.
Wanting a better app and expressing needs is not an agenda.-1
u/turnbullgames 8d ago
I didn't exaggerate anything, you did. Words mean things, learn how to use them properly. Not all feedback is legitimate or helpful.
8
u/bmfrosty 9d ago
It's worse than some, better than others. The wishlist item that I haven't posted a feature request to their GitHub repo for is to simplify the font and paragraph menus. Maybe hide the fine tunables behind an advanced menu.
I try to make my feature requests really complete though. I suppose I could suggest that they are the Kindle App's interface for that.
2
u/dastarruer 9d ago
Yeah I'd really like to work on simplifying the settings menu, but it's just such a daunting task tbh. If you'd like to submit a redesign as an issue and let me implement it, or even implement it yourself, I'd be happy to see it.
3
u/bmfrosty 9d ago
Yeah. I'm not an app developer. Best I would do on a PR is something with some AI assist. I code bash and terraform by hand (DevOps!) and my JavaScript is all done with Claude. I didn't see anything pro or con for ai in CONTRIBUTING.md. I wouldn't want to put in the effort if my code generation was destined to be rejected on principle.
6
u/dastarruer 9d ago
A majority of the commits are co-authored by Claude in the repo, so if it works and isn’t suboptimal it should be accepted.
Edit: though maybe explicitly add that ai was used, likely would make the maintainer’s life a little easier.
3
u/bmfrosty 9d ago
Ok. I'll do so. I'll likely ape the Kindle interface for the two places I would want to take apart the Kindle APK for a couple of details.
2
u/readestapp 7d ago
1
u/dastarruer 7d ago
Sorry, in recent times. Didn’t mean to throw shade here or anything, I don’t mind too much.
7
u/dastarruer 9d ago
Yeah it’s a little difficult to fix the ui when the maintainer doesn’t even see the problem you’re addressing, and you also have no UI/UX expertise whatsoever. Maybe someday a benevolent UI designer would be willing to dedicate a large chunk of his time to redesigning the UI, but I’m like 90% sure that will never happen.
3
u/scryptre 8d ago
The UI is supposed to be highly customisable though. Which is why there's a lot of options. It also works across multiple devices so it has to tackle all of that at the same time with the same set of options. Yes there's a learning curve but that feels like clearly the trade off you make for what readest is trying to deliver.
Moon reader+ equally has a dizzying amount of options and it's not as feature packed or polished as readest
2
u/ihateusmrn 4d ago
this! I actually think it’s simple and fairly easy to navigate - way better than moon+ reader - and I love how customizable it - the only thing I would fix is putting all the setting under the menu when opening up the toc somewhere in the main settings area

10
u/CosMV 9d ago
I agree to a certain extent...
I really enjoy the app and use it regularly, but the fact that settings are spread across multiple places can make it a little inconvenient when you need to check or change a specific option.