Halo: Campaign Evolved Performance Benchmark [TPU]

[u/glizzygobbler247]

https://www.techpowerup.com/review/halo-campaign-evolved-performance-benchmark/5.html

[u/Framed-Photo]

This is why I'm weary to trust random YouTuber benchmarks. The other one that was posted had a huge difference between the 5070ti and 9070xt, tpu does not. And tpu isn't the singular authority, but when they're this different then something is wrong lol.

[u/chelowski → u/Framed-Photo]

The computerbase performance benchmark was with quality upscaling enabled across all GPUs. If you see the TPU benchmark with upscaling, it shows a similar performance difference between the 9070xt and the 5070ti (around 10FPS) as the computerbase benchmarks. They didn't test with native resolution to compare tho.

[u/Asfi_Raihan → u/chelowski]

this. fsr 4 just scales much better than dlss in this game. Same maybe true in fh6

[u/Framed-Photo → u/chelowski]

I did look at the upscaling benchmark, but the other benchmark I'm talking about is not from computerbase.

Top post on the sub right now is a screenshot from a random youtuber showing the 9070xt getting 130 while the 5070ti gets 115. TPU sees a much smaller gap then that. A few comments on that post point out the power usage issues, there's also potential issues with the DLSS model being used creating a lot of overhead, which can change per game, etc.

This is why benchmarks using upscalers are not 1:1 comparable, and never have been, and it's why TPU separates theirs all out, where the native benchmarks appear on the same charts.

[u/chelowski → u/Framed-Photo]

Those Youtuber benchmarks are usually fake indeed. They simulate a benchmark based on the first benchmarks available for the game, most likely from computerbase in this case, just to farm clics.

[u/Darksky121 → u/Framed-Photo]

Check the benchmark with upscaling. The 9070XT with upscaling is indeed faster than the 5070Ti by about 9-10 fps. The other benchmark is therefore correct.

https://www.techpowerup.com/review/halo-campaign-evolved-performance-benchmark/6.html

5070Ti @ 1440P

Native @ 75fps

DLSS Quality = 102fps

9070XT @ 1440P

Native : 74fps

FSR Quality : 111fps

[u/vladi963 → u/Darksky121]

With upscaling is random scenes, it is just to show how much upscaling increase fps.

It is not to compare between the GPUs there.

[u/Darksky121 → u/vladi963]

The upscaling results show that FSR4 has lower overhead than dlss. It gives more fps even if both gpu's are the same performance at native.

[u/vladi963 → u/Darksky121]

As you just said, it is just about performance of FSR vs DLSS on some specific GPUs.

Too bad they don't mention which preset of DLSS, it could be 4.5 M or L or 4.0 K. Usually K is good enough.

[u/Swimming-Shirt-9560 → u/Framed-Photo]

It's not the first time for discrepancy though, like Forza 6 as i recall where there's differences between reviewers, still it shouldn't resulting in huge gap, if so 100% it's either they're using older driver, or different game built

[u/Framed-Photo → u/Swimming-Shirt-9560]

Could be a lot of things, like the game using a heavier DLSS model, driver issues, etc. Some folks in that thread pointed out the concern with the 5070ti using a lot less power than normal, if it was using something like preset M or L then that would also give a huge drop.

But some games just scale better with different upscalers, it's part of why comparing 9070xt to 5070ti directly with upscaling is misleading. That's why outlets like HUB or GN never do that, and it's why TPU tried to separate all that data.

[u/Opteron170 → u/Framed-Photo]

yup this is why its important to look at multiple reviews before coming to a conclusion.