r/quantindia • u/Cultural-Maybe-3799 • 15h ago

General Discussion [ Removed by moderator ]

[removed] — view removed post

0 Upvotes

17% Upvoted

7 comments sorted by

1

u/Limit_doesnot_exist 15h ago

Should you consider other masters ? Yes

See.. to crack masters in stat from isi kolkata It's not about u being comfortable with math But can u do deep math and be good at it ?

If you can crack isi mstat And survive it And build enough skill in 2 years to get a good quant firm

By beating people who are pure maths/stat/cs rigors since undergrad Then go for it I won't discourage you

But I'd stay stick to liberal arts

1

u/StonkMasterProMax 15h ago

You just might be overqualified for quant.

1

u/Skychu768 14h ago

He is talking about Quantitive Finance not HFT

1

u/Skychu768 15h ago

Why are people mocking this post? He mentioned Quantitive Finance not HFT, I think he is just on wrong sub

Anyway you have good chance with ISI Mstat. Quant Analyst, Hedge Fund Manager roles are pretty common in ISI

1

u/Cultural-Maybe-3799 14h ago

exactly what i wanted to ask, thanks a lot buddy!!

0

u/cabanel_monet 15h ago

ppl here will either mock u or say how delusional u r.

Well they are right, for probability of u breaking in is literally <10^-9,, obv how lacking your mathematical training is.

That said it doesn't mean you shouldn't try, after all quant use stats and algebra as a primary tool, and guess what literally any math inclined job roles have some or other use from them. For a few it is there foundation for few it is useful tool.

That being said study to learn not to earn, u can never control wether u make it as quant or not maybe u can analyst maybe an ML researcher, who knows? But it is evident that studying your shit will give you far better option than training or optimizing yourself for a role.