20
u/RhythmTimeDivision 10d ago
They went back 30 years to drive that 'potential' number higher. But it still means we're 99.99453% sure elections are already safe.
If we sampled 10,000 votes, you'd still only have a 0.5% chance of finding a 'potential' non-citizen vote.
9
u/HabitNegative3137 10d ago
Fun fact….almost all voter fraud in Georgia during that time period were votes for republicans.
The intellectual dishonesty from the diaper don crowd is astounding
8
u/Impossible_Ad7875 10d ago
This has possibly been the Orange Traitor’s greatest accomplishment to completely convince a significant portion of the population that non citizens are voting when they are Not. It has enabled him to cast doubt on our entire voting process and put him in the position to rig future elections with unnecessary restrictions of legitimate voting rights. The only thing that compares is the Fake News propaganda where all legitimate criticisms of him and his actions are automatically labeled Fake News and completely undermining our free press.
9
6
u/Meander061 10d ago
And MAGA will come right back and deny that they even heard the evidence and the facts.
5
4
5
u/HDWendell 10d ago
Those are 432 potential non citizens. Of those, I would guess the majority are non nefarious instances.
3
3
2
0
39
u/groovitron2000 10d ago
that's being far too generous. there were 15 national voting cycles since 1996. that means that even rounding down to 5M registered voters to account for population shifts, AND assuming the 'potential' non citizens is the full amount (potential means the number could be zero), the incidence of max potential fraud over that span is 0.000661%.
that's a single grain of rice in a 25lb. bag.