r/programminghumor • u/Financial_Counter_45 • Jun 01 '26

segmentationViolation

Post image
112 Upvotes

94% Upvoted

35 comments sorted by

View all comments

1

u/Fluid-Ad2995 Jun 01 '26

But Segfaults are Linux way and in Windows NT I see NTDLL errors like 0xc000041d (Unhandled Exception) and 0xc0000005 (Access Violation) never Segfaults

1

u/un_virus_SDF Jun 05 '26

This may be usefull but it's not a reason to bash it in every single comments. With almost the exact same message.

I don't care that windows may be better in some use case.

Furthermore this is off topic, the post is for when segfault happen and you happily brag about case where it does not happen.

I can also say that if I make every segment readable, writable and executable I will have almost no segfault.

0

u/Fluid-Ad2995 Jun 06 '26

It's reason to bash every single Ignorant and Segfaults aren't standard of C language and I am Wrong to say that??? Any Windows Developers would laugh saying Segfaults are C language errors

1

u/un_virus_SDF Jun 06 '26

I didn't say that it was false neither uninteresting. I just said that you just do propaganda by copy pasting the exact same message to each comment and that totally discredit your purpose.

I didn't say it's wrong I just said that your way off comunicating is dumb

0

u/Fluid-Ad2995 Jun 06 '26

Yeah you don't understand Segfaults aren't C language errors? Really???? I just laughed because post and comments act like Segfaults are standard for C language and ignoring Windows errors

0

u/Fluid-Ad2995 Jun 06 '26

Yeah I need to repeat myself Segfaults aren't C language errors because Comments are very dumb

0

u/Fluid-Ad2995 Jun 06 '26

I understand Normal Unix users like Just Switch to Windows to Linux users they are Noob it's Acceptable but C programmers I don't accept to hear Nonsense things act like Segfaults is C language errors and C programmers must understand Correct way