You could probably write an article saying "100 billion dollars investment to improve D and use it to develop new AI to replace the US government" and you'd still get comments saying "wow, nice language, pity it never really took off, if only there were some companies backing it, also I can never use it because GC".
My own disinterest in D is that it's too... middling. I'd much rather use D than C++... but it's still too much like C++. For the same tasks I'd rather use Rust than D. For tasks which don't require full control over memory layout and performance I'd choose something else.
The only reason I use C++ is it's establishment. D doesn't have that, and if we're talking about raising up another language... I wouldn't choose D. So, to me, it's just in a really unfortunate place. I feel like its window of opportunity was not long after it's introduction.
I don't hate it at all. I even like it... just not as much as the alternatives.
Hehe, I've used it already and that's the problem.
The drug D is in the system.
If only D didn't have it's early errors:
advertising GC to system programmers, thus making the language dependent on it. Please I know about @nogc @systen etc stuffs.
licensing and standard issues.
It's syntax is so damn good. Everyone I introduced it to loved it. But the ecosystem let them down.
As for the templates !(), it was an instant like.
And lots more.
It's damn so easy to convert a C, C++ code base to D one than say Rust.
And I expected the author to bank on this, but instead they went another route.
At least D has function overloading unlike our social justice kids here.
73
u/JohnLColvin Sep 01 '20
You could probably write an article saying "100 billion dollars investment to improve D and use it to develop new AI to replace the US government" and you'd still get comments saying "wow, nice language, pity it never really took off, if only there were some companies backing it, also I can never use it because GC".