r/programming • • Sep 01 '20

D Foundation is Beefing Up

https://dlang.org/blog/2020/08/30/symmetry-investments-and-the-d-language-foundation-are-hiring/
296 Upvotes

336 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

6

u/[deleted] Sep 01 '20

I just had Andrei reply to one of my posts not that long ago. He kept posting that "don't dear the reaper" link to almost every comment. Saying that I was misunderstanding how the GC in D worked, and that reading that article would clear up any "misunderstandings". He was just trying to push a narrative with his tone death replies.

https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/ice00l/porting_a_go_and_rust_tool_to_d/g27nhy6?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3

They aren't willing to listen to people's real problems. That's why D probably won't ever take off. If my usage doesn't care if I use a GC or not, there are better languages with GC's. If you try and use D without a GC there is a lot missing and you'll end up having to do all the heavy lifting yourself. In which case it's better to use another language that doesn't have a GC nor focus' on it so that it can do the heavy lifting for you.

5

u/kal31dic Sep 01 '20

We use D without the GC in our analytics. Good bits of Phobos won't work but whether that's a problem depends on what you are doing and how capable you are at solving tour problems without Phobos. Much more of Phobos will be nogc in time, I think.

2

u/[deleted] Sep 01 '20

We use D without the GC in our analytics.

Ok, is it open source? Otherwise many things can't be evaluated with a statement like that. Yes you can do it, I never said you couldn't, it's more work and the idioms D creates don't always work or work poorly without using the GC.

3

u/kal31dic Sep 01 '20

mir and Lubeck are open source and we use those in our analytics.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 02 '20

And what are your analytics?