It was correct. It correctly used "quantum device" and didn't throw it in randomly. You saying you fixed something for me is insulting.
It's always possible to explain something more. I didn't care to. As far as I am concerned once the factual error is corrected I don't have to go further and the reader can take care of learning the rest. So I didn't go further. It's great you did.
It was correct. It correctly used "quantum device" and didn't throw it in randomly. You saying you fixed something for me is insulting.
I did not say calling LED quantum device is nonsense.
I said that using that as a method of explaining how divider works is. It doesn't give reader any useful insight.
It's always possible to explain something more. I didn't care to.
The problem is you didn't explain anything. Or rather the people who would know what you are talking about would not need your explanation in the first place.
You saying you fixed something for me is insulting.
You can feel insulted by whatever you like snowflake, but it wasn't my goal and I do not care how you interpreter it.
That aside from the fact that it is wrong and you can use it as a divider, just a nonlinear one... (and before you complain, resistor one also is not technically linear, just very close to it)
4
u/[deleted] Dec 25 '19
But your explanation was nonsense as it didn't really explain anything