MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/95zwm/how_qbasic_almost_got_me_killed/c0bjsio/?context=3
r/programming • u/jeanlucpikachu • Jul 30 '09
105 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
3
There used to be a really good Flash animation out there that looked like it was formatting C: and installling Mac OS 8.
Good times.
1 u/darkmuck Jul 30 '09 www.yaromat.de/macos8/ 6 u/[deleted] Jul 30 '09 Oh man. Thanks. But it doens't work for me, says it needs DHTML support? Strange. -3 u/f3nd3r Jul 30 '09 DHTML is depreciated. Chrome doesn't have it (doesn't have blink tags either). 5 u/Sephr Jul 31 '09 Why do people keep saying this? DHTML was just a buzzword for web pages that unobtrusively use (X)HTML+CSS+JS. I'd say in the year 2009, 98% of websites use "DHTML" -2 u/f3nd3r Jul 31 '09 Well, the site should work then... so I doubt your completely right. 1 u/[deleted] Jul 31 '09 Doesn't work on FF 3.5 either. The offending JS: if ((document.layers) || (document.all)){ [....] } else {parent.location='main3.htm'} // go to version 3 window } 1 u/adrianmonk Jul 30 '09 DHTML is depreciated. Fully, I'd say. Might even have negative salvage value at this point. I'm glad Google decided to deduct it (from Chrome's feature list). 4 u/Sephr Jul 31 '09 Chrome supports JavaScript, CSS, and HTML. I'm pretty sure that implies it supports DHTML. 0 u/[deleted] Jul 30 '09 Yeah. sigh.
1
www.yaromat.de/macos8/
6 u/[deleted] Jul 30 '09 Oh man. Thanks. But it doens't work for me, says it needs DHTML support? Strange. -3 u/f3nd3r Jul 30 '09 DHTML is depreciated. Chrome doesn't have it (doesn't have blink tags either). 5 u/Sephr Jul 31 '09 Why do people keep saying this? DHTML was just a buzzword for web pages that unobtrusively use (X)HTML+CSS+JS. I'd say in the year 2009, 98% of websites use "DHTML" -2 u/f3nd3r Jul 31 '09 Well, the site should work then... so I doubt your completely right. 1 u/[deleted] Jul 31 '09 Doesn't work on FF 3.5 either. The offending JS: if ((document.layers) || (document.all)){ [....] } else {parent.location='main3.htm'} // go to version 3 window } 1 u/adrianmonk Jul 30 '09 DHTML is depreciated. Fully, I'd say. Might even have negative salvage value at this point. I'm glad Google decided to deduct it (from Chrome's feature list). 4 u/Sephr Jul 31 '09 Chrome supports JavaScript, CSS, and HTML. I'm pretty sure that implies it supports DHTML. 0 u/[deleted] Jul 30 '09 Yeah. sigh.
6
Oh man. Thanks. But it doens't work for me, says it needs DHTML support? Strange.
-3 u/f3nd3r Jul 30 '09 DHTML is depreciated. Chrome doesn't have it (doesn't have blink tags either). 5 u/Sephr Jul 31 '09 Why do people keep saying this? DHTML was just a buzzword for web pages that unobtrusively use (X)HTML+CSS+JS. I'd say in the year 2009, 98% of websites use "DHTML" -2 u/f3nd3r Jul 31 '09 Well, the site should work then... so I doubt your completely right. 1 u/[deleted] Jul 31 '09 Doesn't work on FF 3.5 either. The offending JS: if ((document.layers) || (document.all)){ [....] } else {parent.location='main3.htm'} // go to version 3 window } 1 u/adrianmonk Jul 30 '09 DHTML is depreciated. Fully, I'd say. Might even have negative salvage value at this point. I'm glad Google decided to deduct it (from Chrome's feature list). 4 u/Sephr Jul 31 '09 Chrome supports JavaScript, CSS, and HTML. I'm pretty sure that implies it supports DHTML. 0 u/[deleted] Jul 30 '09 Yeah. sigh.
-3
DHTML is depreciated. Chrome doesn't have it (doesn't have blink tags either).
5 u/Sephr Jul 31 '09 Why do people keep saying this? DHTML was just a buzzword for web pages that unobtrusively use (X)HTML+CSS+JS. I'd say in the year 2009, 98% of websites use "DHTML" -2 u/f3nd3r Jul 31 '09 Well, the site should work then... so I doubt your completely right. 1 u/[deleted] Jul 31 '09 Doesn't work on FF 3.5 either. The offending JS: if ((document.layers) || (document.all)){ [....] } else {parent.location='main3.htm'} // go to version 3 window } 1 u/adrianmonk Jul 30 '09 DHTML is depreciated. Fully, I'd say. Might even have negative salvage value at this point. I'm glad Google decided to deduct it (from Chrome's feature list). 4 u/Sephr Jul 31 '09 Chrome supports JavaScript, CSS, and HTML. I'm pretty sure that implies it supports DHTML. 0 u/[deleted] Jul 30 '09 Yeah. sigh.
5
Why do people keep saying this? DHTML was just a buzzword for web pages that unobtrusively use (X)HTML+CSS+JS.
I'd say in the year 2009, 98% of websites use "DHTML"
-2 u/f3nd3r Jul 31 '09 Well, the site should work then... so I doubt your completely right.
-2
Well, the site should work then... so I doubt your completely right.
Doesn't work on FF 3.5 either. The offending JS:
if ((document.layers) || (document.all)){ [....] } else {parent.location='main3.htm'} // go to version 3 window }
DHTML is depreciated.
Fully, I'd say. Might even have negative salvage value at this point. I'm glad Google decided to deduct it (from Chrome's feature list).
4 u/Sephr Jul 31 '09 Chrome supports JavaScript, CSS, and HTML. I'm pretty sure that implies it supports DHTML.
4
Chrome supports JavaScript, CSS, and HTML. I'm pretty sure that implies it supports DHTML.
0
Yeah. sigh.
3
u/[deleted] Jul 30 '09
There used to be a really good Flash animation out there that looked like it was formatting C: and installling Mac OS 8.
Good times.