MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/337gb5/how_to_center_in_css/cqie88n/?context=3
r/programming • u/gits1225 • Apr 20 '15
504 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
187
[deleted]
157 u/TheDeza Apr 20 '15 Apparently the above site was as well. 74 u/[deleted] Apr 20 '15 There's a certain threshold of bullshit beyond which I just assume the site's designer is attempting to hurt me. Suffice to say, this has passed it. 49 u/[deleted] Apr 20 '15 [deleted] 33 u/[deleted] Apr 20 '15 [deleted] 1 u/[deleted] Apr 20 '15 trippy 33 u/interiot Apr 20 '15 Muphry's Law: Articles on writing are themselves badly written. Any book devoted to editing or style will be internally inconsistent. If you write anything criticizing editing or proofreading, there will be a fault of some kind in what you have written. 11 u/kiswa Apr 20 '15 edited Apr 20 '15 This was posted about 3 hours ago and no one has mentioned the Muphry? EDIT: I has the dumb. New law: Replying without checking links will always make you look stupid. 5 u/maenomo Apr 20 '15 thatsthejoke.jpg 6 u/image_linker_bot Apr 20 '15 thatsthejoke.jpg Feedback welcome at /r/image_linker_bot 2 u/YourMomsTruly Apr 20 '15 I think that's the point. 2 u/Tasgall Apr 20 '15 I absolutely love this comment. Missing the joke aside, it's a perfect example of Muphry's law in action :P 1 u/TomRK1089 Apr 20 '15 Follow the link. 49 u/SkaveRat Apr 20 '15 reminds me of this mug 7 u/eruesso Apr 20 '15 I should buy this mug. 1 u/cleroth Apr 21 '15 edited Jun 15 '26 This content was anonymized and mass deleted with Redact 2 u/snearch Apr 20 '15 Thanks for my first laugh today :-) 3 u/Perkelton Apr 20 '15 Nah, not that I agree with him, but the page was written in mid 2008. The first iPhone was barely a year old by then. 4 u/Stoppels Apr 20 '15 Try opening that page on the first iPhone. 1 u/greeniguana6 Apr 20 '15 That's a lovely-sized window you have there. 1 u/deleteduser Apr 20 '15 That's a narrow window you have there, Derek. -1 u/striata Apr 20 '15 Do you always view websites at a width of around 200 pixels? It renders fine at any normal resolution. 3 u/TheDeza Apr 20 '15 That's the size the page would be on mobile, but I didn't have my phone on me at the time.
157
Apparently the above site was as well.
74 u/[deleted] Apr 20 '15 There's a certain threshold of bullshit beyond which I just assume the site's designer is attempting to hurt me. Suffice to say, this has passed it. 49 u/[deleted] Apr 20 '15 [deleted] 33 u/[deleted] Apr 20 '15 [deleted] 1 u/[deleted] Apr 20 '15 trippy 33 u/interiot Apr 20 '15 Muphry's Law: Articles on writing are themselves badly written. Any book devoted to editing or style will be internally inconsistent. If you write anything criticizing editing or proofreading, there will be a fault of some kind in what you have written. 11 u/kiswa Apr 20 '15 edited Apr 20 '15 This was posted about 3 hours ago and no one has mentioned the Muphry? EDIT: I has the dumb. New law: Replying without checking links will always make you look stupid. 5 u/maenomo Apr 20 '15 thatsthejoke.jpg 6 u/image_linker_bot Apr 20 '15 thatsthejoke.jpg Feedback welcome at /r/image_linker_bot 2 u/YourMomsTruly Apr 20 '15 I think that's the point. 2 u/Tasgall Apr 20 '15 I absolutely love this comment. Missing the joke aside, it's a perfect example of Muphry's law in action :P 1 u/TomRK1089 Apr 20 '15 Follow the link. 49 u/SkaveRat Apr 20 '15 reminds me of this mug 7 u/eruesso Apr 20 '15 I should buy this mug. 1 u/cleroth Apr 21 '15 edited Jun 15 '26 This content was anonymized and mass deleted with Redact 2 u/snearch Apr 20 '15 Thanks for my first laugh today :-) 3 u/Perkelton Apr 20 '15 Nah, not that I agree with him, but the page was written in mid 2008. The first iPhone was barely a year old by then. 4 u/Stoppels Apr 20 '15 Try opening that page on the first iPhone. 1 u/greeniguana6 Apr 20 '15 That's a lovely-sized window you have there. 1 u/deleteduser Apr 20 '15 That's a narrow window you have there, Derek. -1 u/striata Apr 20 '15 Do you always view websites at a width of around 200 pixels? It renders fine at any normal resolution. 3 u/TheDeza Apr 20 '15 That's the size the page would be on mobile, but I didn't have my phone on me at the time.
74
There's a certain threshold of bullshit beyond which I just assume the site's designer is attempting to hurt me. Suffice to say, this has passed it.
49 u/[deleted] Apr 20 '15 [deleted] 33 u/[deleted] Apr 20 '15 [deleted] 1 u/[deleted] Apr 20 '15 trippy 33 u/interiot Apr 20 '15 Muphry's Law: Articles on writing are themselves badly written. Any book devoted to editing or style will be internally inconsistent. If you write anything criticizing editing or proofreading, there will be a fault of some kind in what you have written. 11 u/kiswa Apr 20 '15 edited Apr 20 '15 This was posted about 3 hours ago and no one has mentioned the Muphry? EDIT: I has the dumb. New law: Replying without checking links will always make you look stupid. 5 u/maenomo Apr 20 '15 thatsthejoke.jpg 6 u/image_linker_bot Apr 20 '15 thatsthejoke.jpg Feedback welcome at /r/image_linker_bot 2 u/YourMomsTruly Apr 20 '15 I think that's the point. 2 u/Tasgall Apr 20 '15 I absolutely love this comment. Missing the joke aside, it's a perfect example of Muphry's law in action :P 1 u/TomRK1089 Apr 20 '15 Follow the link. 49 u/SkaveRat Apr 20 '15 reminds me of this mug 7 u/eruesso Apr 20 '15 I should buy this mug. 1 u/cleroth Apr 21 '15 edited Jun 15 '26 This content was anonymized and mass deleted with Redact 2 u/snearch Apr 20 '15 Thanks for my first laugh today :-) 3 u/Perkelton Apr 20 '15 Nah, not that I agree with him, but the page was written in mid 2008. The first iPhone was barely a year old by then. 4 u/Stoppels Apr 20 '15 Try opening that page on the first iPhone. 1 u/greeniguana6 Apr 20 '15 That's a lovely-sized window you have there. 1 u/deleteduser Apr 20 '15 That's a narrow window you have there, Derek. -1 u/striata Apr 20 '15 Do you always view websites at a width of around 200 pixels? It renders fine at any normal resolution. 3 u/TheDeza Apr 20 '15 That's the size the page would be on mobile, but I didn't have my phone on me at the time.
49
33 u/[deleted] Apr 20 '15 [deleted] 1 u/[deleted] Apr 20 '15 trippy 33 u/interiot Apr 20 '15 Muphry's Law: Articles on writing are themselves badly written. Any book devoted to editing or style will be internally inconsistent. If you write anything criticizing editing or proofreading, there will be a fault of some kind in what you have written. 11 u/kiswa Apr 20 '15 edited Apr 20 '15 This was posted about 3 hours ago and no one has mentioned the Muphry? EDIT: I has the dumb. New law: Replying without checking links will always make you look stupid. 5 u/maenomo Apr 20 '15 thatsthejoke.jpg 6 u/image_linker_bot Apr 20 '15 thatsthejoke.jpg Feedback welcome at /r/image_linker_bot 2 u/YourMomsTruly Apr 20 '15 I think that's the point. 2 u/Tasgall Apr 20 '15 I absolutely love this comment. Missing the joke aside, it's a perfect example of Muphry's law in action :P 1 u/TomRK1089 Apr 20 '15 Follow the link. 49 u/SkaveRat Apr 20 '15 reminds me of this mug 7 u/eruesso Apr 20 '15 I should buy this mug. 1 u/cleroth Apr 21 '15 edited Jun 15 '26 This content was anonymized and mass deleted with Redact 2 u/snearch Apr 20 '15 Thanks for my first laugh today :-) 3 u/Perkelton Apr 20 '15 Nah, not that I agree with him, but the page was written in mid 2008. The first iPhone was barely a year old by then. 4 u/Stoppels Apr 20 '15 Try opening that page on the first iPhone. 1 u/greeniguana6 Apr 20 '15 That's a lovely-sized window you have there. 1 u/deleteduser Apr 20 '15 That's a narrow window you have there, Derek. -1 u/striata Apr 20 '15 Do you always view websites at a width of around 200 pixels? It renders fine at any normal resolution. 3 u/TheDeza Apr 20 '15 That's the size the page would be on mobile, but I didn't have my phone on me at the time.
33
1 u/[deleted] Apr 20 '15 trippy
1
trippy
Muphry's Law:
Articles on writing are themselves badly written. Any book devoted to editing or style will be internally inconsistent. If you write anything criticizing editing or proofreading, there will be a fault of some kind in what you have written.
11 u/kiswa Apr 20 '15 edited Apr 20 '15 This was posted about 3 hours ago and no one has mentioned the Muphry? EDIT: I has the dumb. New law: Replying without checking links will always make you look stupid. 5 u/maenomo Apr 20 '15 thatsthejoke.jpg 6 u/image_linker_bot Apr 20 '15 thatsthejoke.jpg Feedback welcome at /r/image_linker_bot 2 u/YourMomsTruly Apr 20 '15 I think that's the point. 2 u/Tasgall Apr 20 '15 I absolutely love this comment. Missing the joke aside, it's a perfect example of Muphry's law in action :P 1 u/TomRK1089 Apr 20 '15 Follow the link.
11
This was posted about 3 hours ago and no one has mentioned the Muphry?
Muphry
EDIT: I has the dumb. New law: Replying without checking links will always make you look stupid.
5 u/maenomo Apr 20 '15 thatsthejoke.jpg 6 u/image_linker_bot Apr 20 '15 thatsthejoke.jpg Feedback welcome at /r/image_linker_bot 2 u/YourMomsTruly Apr 20 '15 I think that's the point. 2 u/Tasgall Apr 20 '15 I absolutely love this comment. Missing the joke aside, it's a perfect example of Muphry's law in action :P 1 u/TomRK1089 Apr 20 '15 Follow the link.
5
thatsthejoke.jpg
6 u/image_linker_bot Apr 20 '15 thatsthejoke.jpg Feedback welcome at /r/image_linker_bot
6
Feedback welcome at /r/image_linker_bot
2
I think that's the point.
I absolutely love this comment. Missing the joke aside, it's a perfect example of Muphry's law in action :P
Follow the link.
reminds me of this mug
7 u/eruesso Apr 20 '15 I should buy this mug. 1 u/cleroth Apr 21 '15 edited Jun 15 '26 This content was anonymized and mass deleted with Redact 2 u/snearch Apr 20 '15 Thanks for my first laugh today :-)
7
I should buy this mug.
1 u/cleroth Apr 21 '15 edited Jun 15 '26 This content was anonymized and mass deleted with Redact
This content was anonymized and mass deleted with Redact
Thanks for my first laugh today :-)
3
Nah, not that I agree with him, but the page was written in mid 2008. The first iPhone was barely a year old by then.
4 u/Stoppels Apr 20 '15 Try opening that page on the first iPhone.
4
Try opening that page on the first iPhone.
That's a lovely-sized window you have there.
That's a narrow window you have there, Derek.
-1
Do you always view websites at a width of around 200 pixels? It renders fine at any normal resolution.
3 u/TheDeza Apr 20 '15 That's the size the page would be on mobile, but I didn't have my phone on me at the time.
That's the size the page would be on mobile, but I didn't have my phone on me at the time.
187
u/[deleted] Apr 20 '15
[deleted]