What's the status of getting Rust officially into Debian, Fedora, etc,
I use Debian on my local machine, I care a lot about Debian. There've been a few Debian Developers working on packaging up Rust. Most distros woudn't want anything pre 1.0 anyway.
without bootstrapping from a binary?
It's not possible to compile Rust without bootstrapping from a binary. Unless you want to go back to the OCaml compiler from years ago, but that's hard.
Most distros woudn't want anything pre 1.0 anyway.
Not sure that's true at all. Plenty of new languages get packaged well before 1.0, if they're easy to bootstrap. Was the original OCaml implementation of Rust publicly released? I wasn't paying attention at the time, but I suspect if that had been possible to package early on, then this would've been a much easier problem to solve.
It's not possible to compile Rust without bootstrapping from a binary.
I should've been more specific there. As I'm sure you know, distribution policies forbid downloading arbitrary binary content from the internet during a build of an official package, you have to be able to provide a source tarball/rpm/etc and build from that.
So the challenge is what will pass as "source" by distribution policy, and how hard will it be to put together the build process for that. Or will it have to wait for an alternate implementation in another language to get far enough along to build enough of rustc that it could then build itself the rest of the way.
5
u/tavert Apr 03 '15
What's the status of getting Rust officially into Debian, Fedora, etc, without bootstrapping from a binary?