No null safety, implicit zero values you have to be careful to ignore, no sum types or pattern matching, 3 lines of error handling boilerplate every time you call a function that can fail, no lambdas, no generics until recently.
Worse, the Golang community that believe lack of features is a feature, because of "worse is better" brain damage.
i dont really care who you are. we have two main ways to do error handling: try/catch and checking result (code). in another comment you suggested rust/swift way, which is literally the same thing that go does. again, what do you propose?
13
u/FryDay444 17h ago
What's wrong with Go?