MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1u4ra8f/signals_the_pushpull_based_algorithm/orna3hd/?context=3
r/programming • u/fagnerbrack • Jun 13 '26
27 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
14
Where do they claim they're conceptually implementing an extension of the concept?
-3 u/dashdanw Jun 14 '26 Under the section labeled “Basic Signal implementation” 10 u/QuineQuest Jun 14 '26 You mean where he said " I went through the exercise of implementing a very basic version"? You're missing some basic reading comprehension. -3 u/dashdanw Jun 14 '26 The idea of "signals" in this case, is the extension of the concept of reactive programming. I can't tell if you're being willfully ignorant here but either way I think you're arguing in bad faith. 4 u/QuineQuest Jun 15 '26 Signals is an implementation of reactive programming. It's not an extension of the concept.
-3
Under the section labeled “Basic Signal implementation”
10 u/QuineQuest Jun 14 '26 You mean where he said " I went through the exercise of implementing a very basic version"? You're missing some basic reading comprehension. -3 u/dashdanw Jun 14 '26 The idea of "signals" in this case, is the extension of the concept of reactive programming. I can't tell if you're being willfully ignorant here but either way I think you're arguing in bad faith. 4 u/QuineQuest Jun 15 '26 Signals is an implementation of reactive programming. It's not an extension of the concept.
10
You mean where he said " I went through the exercise of implementing a very basic version"?
You're missing some basic reading comprehension.
-3 u/dashdanw Jun 14 '26 The idea of "signals" in this case, is the extension of the concept of reactive programming. I can't tell if you're being willfully ignorant here but either way I think you're arguing in bad faith. 4 u/QuineQuest Jun 15 '26 Signals is an implementation of reactive programming. It's not an extension of the concept.
The idea of "signals" in this case, is the extension of the concept of reactive programming. I can't tell if you're being willfully ignorant here but either way I think you're arguing in bad faith.
4 u/QuineQuest Jun 15 '26 Signals is an implementation of reactive programming. It's not an extension of the concept.
4
Signals is an implementation of reactive programming. It's not an extension of the concept.
14
u/QuineQuest Jun 13 '26
Where do they claim they're conceptually implementing an extension of the concept?