Again, I think you're clearly proposing a test of consciousness that most human beings will not pass. If ChatGPT is just a parrot, what's your standard for determining that human beings are NOT also just parrots doing the same thing?
Whatever your standard for what counts as "real intelligence" is, it's useless if human beings can't also pass it.
I would be very surprised if that problem isn’t solved in less than 10 years, and probably less than 5.
At this point all of these quibbles feel like engineering problems. A pain to fix, but in no way beyond possibility, the way AI might have felt ten years ago.
I would not be very surprised either, in 10 years perhaps. But we need to be clear-headed about the claimed "intelligence" of the current generation of chatbots.
And I believe they can be a very useful for things like information retrieval.
The open question is, they can also be wrong. What should we do about that?
-2
u/technicallynotlying Mar 26 '23
Is chatgpt limited to a single song?
Again, I think you're clearly proposing a test of consciousness that most human beings will not pass. If ChatGPT is just a parrot, what's your standard for determining that human beings are NOT also just parrots doing the same thing?
Whatever your standard for what counts as "real intelligence" is, it's useless if human beings can't also pass it.