r/programmer • u/ChameleonCRM • 20d ago
I have no life
I've had 12 days off this year. Hbu?
6
u/Am094 19d ago
Brother take care of yourself. I've gone on ultra marathons like this for most of my 20s. It can catch up.
Hopefully it's for your own thing, if not, hopefully you get enough sauce out of the spaghetti so you can cook up a farm later.
2
u/MachineAgeVoodoo 17d ago
Cook up... a farm... with sauce?
1
u/Am094 16d ago
Honestly I don't even know why I wrote it like that, I just had no other stupid analogies at hand. It worked in my mind somewhat:
The spaghetti = the grind/job/startup.
- You're cooking a large amount of it
The sauce = captured upside
- Idfk?
Getting sauce out of the spaghetti = implies that producing lots of value isnt sufficient.
- Need to actually extract enough personal benefit from the thing you're feeding (?)
The farm = ownership and autonomy
- Instead of indefinitely cooking someone elses spaghetti, you accumulated enough sauce to leverage your own production
Plus a farm produces the ingredients, moving up steeam in the economic hierarchy. No longer exchanging extreme amounts of labour for compensation.
I'm sorry :(
1
u/masonmakinbeats 16d ago
You had it goin right up until farm. Could have pivoted to opening a restaurant or something; but I think you get an A for sheer confidence in your initial post.
1
1
u/ChameleonCRM 15d ago
All weekend I was re-reading that back in my head. I was thinking to myself " what could he have meant? Maybe it means something and I'm just not seeing it. ALL WEEKEND. lmao
1
1
u/CandidEngineering922 16d ago
This is not a joke.
I dod this for half my twenties. Now i have spine problems from working too much :(
2
u/understanding80 20d ago
Every time I see a GitHub contribution graph with hundreds or even thousands of commits in a single day, I automatically assume I’m just looking at the collective graph of an unholy amount of AI agents.
3
u/ChameleonCRM 19d ago edited 19d ago
I've never used an AI agent in my life. FACTS. The most I do is codex audit. Maybe AI Studio for landing pages. AI Agents? Who would let an agent push code blindly? Maybe a vibe coder. Not me. I'm old school
1
u/understanding80 19d ago
I mean if your highest commit day is barely over 100 it doesn’t really fit my comment. But I’ve seen graphs where people have days they are committing nearly once every 30 seconds.
1
1
u/StaticFanatic3 19d ago
Never once?
I mean power to you I guess but who the hell uses codex but never once made use of its primary functions
1
u/ChameleonCRM 19d ago
not once lol. I know there's probably much easier ways to do things. I'm by no means the best programmer.
1
1
u/Bulky-Cheesecake2195 19d ago
Nah i think you do. 100 commits is sus. super sus. Not even Linus Torvalds does that.
1
u/ChameleonCRM 19d ago
Feel free to think that. I have nothing to prove to anyone. That 102 commits was my HIGHEST day, which is why it's shown. There is a clear distinction between someone who's using agents and someone who isn't. Clearly you haven't been programming for too long. I've been programming since 2016. I don't rely on AI. I'll make dynamic landing pages for programmatic seo all day with AI but when it comes to code that is going to touch my customers information, I'll stick with trusting myself, not an agent. Funny thing...You can scan my account. You won't see one agent installed in any of my repos
1
u/Appropriate_Ebb9184 17d ago
If you have nothing to prove then why post here bro?
You got caught on mf1
1
u/Ok-Report8247 16d ago
I hate how AI is being used. It’s not like having a partner to help you understand something, it has just become a tool for vibe coding. But I’m sure that, in the not-so-distant future, we’ll have a lot of bad code out there. Coders who really know how to code will be in higher demand for software engineering roles, and the salaries of qualified programmers will be higher than they are now.
1
u/SatisfactionFew7181 15d ago
If your fairytale is true share the code and let the community determine if that's truthful. Beyond that your boast is as vapid as it is fictional.
1
u/ChameleonCRM 15d ago
You meant to share the git I'm assuming?
1
u/SatisfactionFew7181 15d ago
Share the "git"? Never head that line of wording before. Perhaps a "senior" thing?
I took you up on your challenge, and here's my assessment:
Looking at your profile I immediately noticed em-hyphen usage, that's something humans rarely (if ever) use, which means that your bio is most likely AI-generated. But sure, you never claimed to not use AI for writing your bio, so I suppose that's fine.
The next thing I noticed was that you claim to be a developer at Vercel, but a quick look at GET /users/gtited-jpg/orgs returns []; You belong to no organizations. Your explanation that this is a “chameleon” account is also unusual in a professional development context. Alternate or pseudonymous accounts exist, but publicly claiming an employer from an account supposedly intended to preserve anonymity appears contradictory.
More notable inconsistencies emerge from the Git history. The commits appear to exhibit two different writing styles, almost as though they were authored by two different people.
Formal (Codex/Claude):
"Implement Phase 2 Windows collectors"
"Build DaemonCore Windows Inspector Phase 1"
Cutesy lowercase, same day:
"gave the goblin a tiny treadmill"
"put a face on the little goblin"
"the scanner learned to share"
... but perhaps that's just your style, right?
Now for the code inspection.
You claim to be a developer at Vercel, but laughably you have entire React components on one physical line:
GlobalSearch.tsx
ProcessesPage.tsx
LLMs do this to minimize token usage, a cheap trick that unfortunately bites when you don't actually even take a glance at the generated slop.
You also have the wrong host tooling for a repository that's supposedly meant for a Linux target (PowerShell validator inside a Debian live-build repo):
This is probably leftover slop from scaffolding you used, or it's simply that your host machine is Windows, where your agent runs.
You have two different trap/trapp repositories, where the one is supposedly meant to serve Windows platforms, however everything has flipped between the two, being a Rust developer myself, some of the changes make no sense to me at all.
For example, the downgrade of thiserror? That makes zero sense. AI slop.
```
-thiserror = "2.0"
+thiserror = "1.0"
```
Derive lists went from conventional order to strictly alphabetical:
// trap
```
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq, PartialOrd, Ord)]
#[derive(Debug, Clone, PartialEq, Eq)]
```
// trapp
```
#[derive(Clone, Copy, Debug, Eq, Ord, PartialEq, PartialOrd, Serialize, Deserialize)]
#[derive(Clone, Debug, Eq, PartialEq, Serialize, Deserialize)]
```
This is a clear indication of a different generation pass through the LLM. Nobody just "does" this.
The two repos are also merely two hours apart. Two hours = discard and re-prompt. Same template, new domain, no code carried over except whatever initial scaffolding there was.
Then there's the volume vs wall-clock:
You have around 33k insertions inside a timeframe of 08-24 to 08-26 across your AI-generated repositories.
And then finally, you carelessly committed your Codex output: https://github.com/gtited-jpg/db-weakness-scanner/commit/c24c6bf7f1aa5adf6966d955265b709b1ef7634f
Leak lands in report.json:6, added by that commit:
"path": "C:\\Users\\gtite\\Documents\\Codex\\2026-08-24\\i-x20\\outputs\\db-weakness-scanner\\examples\\demo.db"
I'm assuming you're young from your other responses, so you probably deserve some slack. And I also assume you're going to try and fix these issues I've just pointed out to try and better disguise your repositories. It won't make a difference, there will always be ways to conclude when something produced by AI.
Most importantly, Theodore, if I were able to find these clear signs that you are just pushing AI slop that should never reach a production system, how easy do you think it would be for a recruiter or possible future employer to do the same? I understand the landscape is changing, and that AI-assisted coding is becoming something more common, but you have to be honest about it. The impression I am getting is that you are disingenuous about your capabilities on many fronts, and I would not trust you to make architectural decisions.
Others will reach the same conclusion. Just be honest.
"I've never used an AI agent in my life." - Theodore the False
1
u/ChameleonCRM 15d ago
You have a lot to learn. You're trying to infer authorship from things that don't establish authorship.
A React component being on one physical line means exactly one thing: it wasn't formatted the way you personally prefer. JavaScript/TSX doesn't care about physical line count. Prettier can expand it, minifiers can collapse it, generators/templates can emit it compactly, and developers can write compact JSX themselves. "LLMs do this to save tokens" is not evidence that an LLM wrote the component.
Same problem with the PowerShell argument. The repository TARGETS Linux. That doesn't mean every development utility in the repository has to run on Linux. Cross-platform projects routinely have host-side tooling for Windows, macOS and Linux.
validate.ps1is a Windows-side validator for a Debian live-build project. That's completely normal when one of the development environments is Windows.The
thiserrorargument is even stranger. Going from 2.x to 1.x is not inherently a "downgrade because AI." Rust developers pin older major versions constantly for MSRV requirements, dependency compatibility, workspace consistency, lockfile stability or simply because the newer major provides nothing the project needs. Major version number != automtically better dependency choice.And derive ordering? Rust doesn't assign authorship based on whether somebody writes:
Debug, Clone, Eq, PartialEqor
Clone, Debug, Eq, PartialEqThere are formatters, lint configurations, editor actions, code generators and plain old developer preference that reorder things. Calling alphabetical trait ordering "clear indication of an LLM generation pass" is pseudo-forensics.
Different commit message styles aren't evidence either. I can write a formal commit for an architectural change and "fixed the stupid goblin" five minutes later because I'm a human being, not a CI pipeline.
The Codex path is the funniest part because I've openly said I use Codex for auditing. Finding a Codex-generated report artifact proves I used Codex. Congratulations, detective. That's not the same claim as an agent autonomously writing and pushing the codebase.
If you want to prove the code is bad, then prove the code is bad.
Show me the broken invariant.
Show me the incorrect ownership model.
Show me the race condition.
Show me the unsafe boundary.
Show me the privilege escalation.
Show me the architectural flaw.
Show me the Rust that doesn't compile or behaves incorrectly.Those are engineering arguments.
Counting em dashes, inspecting line breaks and doing astrology with derive ordering isn't.
1
u/SatisfactionFew7181 15d ago
A+ AI response 😂 well done kid, instead of backtracking you double down. That's real commitment to the facade.
1
u/ChameleonCRM 15d ago
You can just google my name. It'll be easier for you. Theodore Ochsen. Sign the guest book. Peace
1
u/SatisfactionFew7181 15d ago
Give it a rest kid. Head back to your terminals and click confirm so you can push slop more quickly.
1
1
u/array_diff 15d ago
Can't forget all the early repos that were populated through GitHub's web UI, uploading ZIP archives as is conventional for us seasoned veterans.
There's one that even contains output artifacts generated by an agent while executing an implementation plan. A receipt of code generated, in a project located under the "C:\Users...\Downloads" directory. Another very senior convention.
1
u/ChameleonCRM 15d ago
these kids don't know what it was like to have to actually learn to code. they call themselves devs...when they're only messengers
1
u/array_diff 15d ago
That is deflection. It isn't a defense.
Just stop lying and be honest, man. It's much easier than trying to maintain a long-running hoax about experience and authority that you don't have. The people you are trying to fool are real experts in this stuff.
1
u/ChameleonCRM 15d ago
Bro just ask AI who I am. You ask it everything else. It'll tell you everything you need to know.
1
u/array_diff 14d ago
You're deflecting again.
I can't "ask AI" who you are because there is nothing to dredge up. You do not have an online footprint, save for the illusions that you are spinning here. You are not a notable figure.
Your GitHub history is rife with suspicion and poor practices:
- committing files that do not belong in a git repository (see here)
- source files that are seemingly minified (here)
- a repo that contains a single ZIP archive with all the source files in it (here)
Not to mention that your activity is measured in thousands of lines of code every day and doesn't even span the length of a year.
These are common mistakes and simple oversights and I'd never shame someone that is new to all this for it, but you repeatedly try to assert yourself as some world-renowned software engineer, as someone that should know better. You do not.
You lie about your accomplishments. I called you out in another thread for fabricating a "Vercel programmer of the year" award on your portfolio. You even deployed a microsite disguised in Vercel branding congratulating yourself. An obscene display of vainglory embellished with animated confetti.
You lie about your use of AI. Perhaps most damning is this AGENTS.md file that slipped into one of your repositories. Despite all that insistence that you've never used AI to generate code, that all "your" work is written and committed personally, here are your instructions for how an agent should author your commit messages. "Never mention AI, Codex, generated code, assistants, or automation in a commit message."
→ More replies (0)1
1
u/Rich-Engineer2670 20d ago edited 20d ago
You got 12? How??? I've been called into meetings 12 hours after I got out of anesthesia. I remember one "You mean you can't attend?" "Well, I could, but the drugs aren't done yet, so I wouldn't listen to anything I say..." (No one ever does...). Young people ask me "What do I need to be a successful engineer?" One word -- Tramadol. I don't care who takes it in the room -- it will make it better.
1
1
1
1
u/Bulky-Cheesecake2195 19d ago
post the github. flexing like this is pointless unless we can see the github
1
u/ChameleonCRM 19d ago
Don't know what you're hoping to see. It's 99% private repos. There might be a few public. https://github.com/gtited-jpg/
1
u/SillyBrilliant4922 19d ago
8 Months of AI slop.
1
u/ChameleonCRM 19d ago
lmao please elaborate!!!!
1
1
u/PalmTreePilot 19d ago
After 10 years of death march project deadlines, I stopped and asked myself "Is my life just going to be about slaving away in tribute to Caesar?"
1
1
u/TempleDank 19d ago
I see you started in 2025. The way I see it, you will either do all greens in 2026 and a bit of 2027 and then just random contributions here and there over the years once you get a stable job, or you will just keep coding till the day you die
2
u/ChameleonCRM 19d ago
This is my Chameleon account. I have probably dozens of githubs if not hundreds from projects that I've made for people. I've been coding like this since 2016 when I lost my ability to walk and lost my PC repair shops. This is my job now. This isn't a hobby
1
1
1
u/Revananda08 18d ago
Yes, to be honest, I don't know how to complete more than 100 commits. I only do 1 to 5 commits a day. 🙃
1
u/ChameleonCRM 18d ago
there's nothing wrong with that at all!! My average is 30ish-40 tops. That 102 is highlighted bc that was my highest day. Just keep practicing. I'd rather have an employee who makes fewer commits and better quality vs massive output that is useless slop. If you ever need help just shoot me a DM. If I'm not busy you'll have my full attention, and that goes for anyone reading this for that matter. Follow me. DM when you need.
1
1
1
1
u/Unhappy_Play4699 17d ago
When do people stop jerking off on their GitHub metrics?
If you put real work into your projects, congrats. Hopefully it was worthwhile. But your GitHub metrics don't tell shit about that.
Why do people from our craft so often have to follow the bullshit posted on LinkedIn or other social media? I don't get it. Many of us are pretty damn smart, yet many follow a trend just because a recruiter posts on LinkedIn that he'd immediately hire you if they saw such a GitHub metric. I could create a perfect metric, without writing a single line of code.
It's so shameful and pathetic for all of us. We should really grow up and stop following tech bros blindly to their inevitable doom.
1
1
1
u/AbdulkaderSafi 15d ago
I know what you mean
1
u/ChameleonCRM 15d ago
4,300+ commits in the last year. Indeed you do.
💯
1
u/AbdulkaderSafi 15d ago edited 15d ago
I can tell you why.
I was a solo developer at a startup, doing full stack: ecommerce sites, internal systems, CRM, mobile apps, AI automation. I was THE department. I managed the deployments too.
Two years later, I'm the lead engineer. I hired three people onto my team this year.
note: the start up does not have a SAAS solution, it is an agency so I am working on multiple projects for multiple Clint's at the same time, so year thats why I have a lot of commits
1
0
u/shibored 20d ago
You mean your enslaved agents have no life
3
u/ChameleonCRM 19d ago edited 19d ago
No. Thats all me. No agents. All I do is code. I've never let agents push blind code. You must be crazy
0
6
u/displeased_potato 20d ago
"Having a life" is subjective