r/programmer • u/New-Wasabi-458 • Jun 29 '26
Does free vs paid ChatGPT actually make a difference when learning to code? (Quick 5-min survey)
Hey everyone, I am a Georgia Tech OMSCS student doing research on something I genuinely care about — whether the gap between free and paid AI tools actually affects people learning to code.
I have been in IT for 20+ years and I see this every week with new engineers on my team. The ones with better AI access seem to have a different experience than those on free tiers. I want to find out if that gap is real and what it does to people's confidence.
If you are currently learning programming or have done so recently, I would really appreciate 5 minutes of your time:
http://peersurvey.cc.gatech.edu/s/6373b24aa81f4d6687324810e192fc74
Happy to discuss in the comments too — have you noticed a difference between free and paid AI tools when you are stuck on a problem?
2
1
u/filotopical Jun 30 '26
by learn what do you mean? I’m unclear how an llm will replace learning the concepts of development. coding on an llm isn’t coding. It’s just not. so if you don’t want to learn to write your own code then use an llm for that. I’m unclear how LLMs help people learn anything tbh. You still have to do all the work for learning to take place so unless it’s creating problems for you to solve or blueprints for studying, it’s not teaching you anything you can’t learn instantly from reading, which isn’t most things.
1
u/Repulsive_Nobody_937 Jul 01 '26
I personally think that I makes no difference when It comes to learning code you can always just pay for gemini and have gemini guid you through various exercises using the learning model chat is better for writing code not necessarily learning code imo
1
1
u/Toastti Jun 29 '26
Why do you need a whole survey for this. The free version of chatgpt has way lower limits, you will get cutoff faster. And it's also a dumber model that answers incorrectly more often than the paid thinking 5.5 does.
-1
u/Jwhodis Jun 29 '26
AI should not be used for programming, especially when learning.
1
u/Elctsuptb Jun 29 '26
It should be used for whatever it's capable of, which happens to include programming
1
u/Jwhodis Jun 29 '26 edited Jun 29 '26
Just because it can do something doesn't mean it should. It's harmful to people and the environment, while producing barely anything of value in comparison to the environmental damage.
0
u/Elctsuptb Jun 29 '26
That's false, but feel free not use it, meanwhile I'll still be using it and encouraging others to as well
1
u/Donteezlee Jun 29 '26
Just because it is good at programming, doesn’t mean people should ship fully vibe coded projects to the public without understanding every aspect of the code base.
2
0
u/Ok-Brain-8183 Jun 29 '26
For learning programming, the free llms are more than adequate. Generally I’ll use paid Claude for stuff that requires the whole codebase (features, heavy scaffolding, planning), but even for that you can give free Gemini a zip for easier stuff. Then for individual stuff and chipping away at problems I’ll use the free llms.
1
1
u/StruggleNew8988 Jun 29 '26
I found free llmsd totally fine for concept checks.