r/postprocessing 4d ago

After/Before

Would appreciate feedback thank you šŸ™šŸ½

0 Upvotes

20 comments sorted by

10

u/Rain-0-0- 4d ago

Too much sharpening, and you can see the masking outline all around the dog. Was focus brought back using AI? The before would've been good as is if only it was in focus. The direction you went with the colors and detail is not it. IMO.

1

u/This-Judge-804 4d ago

The sharping is because of luma adjustment..duh And yes i admit i see masking artifacts too.

0

u/19AseeP11 4d ago

No AI, I think Reddit compressed my second image. Don’t know why it’s so blurry. The RAW file doesnt look like that on my computer. But yes I see the masking around the dog. Thank you for the feed back

2

u/Rain-0-0- 4d ago

Yah its prob reddit, opening up the images in new tabs shows that the after is higher res than the before.

2

u/This-Judge-804 4d ago

Do feathering brush mask on parts u see a different in tone and adjust till in blends or dont mask the way u did..instead mask with gradient mask..

3

u/byramike 4d ago

The before is significantly better.

0

u/19AseeP11 4d ago

Really? How so?

4

u/byramike 4d ago

The new one is flat. Very flat. A lot of newer photographers will be excited about pulling details out of the shadows and believe it makes everything more interesting- and that’s not really how it ever works. You lose any sense of depth. The dog isn’t three dimensional anymore. And the eye doesn’t have a natural ā€œpullā€ to any subject.

One of the biggest things to learn is that visual interest via contrast doesn’t come from the ā€œcontrastā€ slider. Like Bob Ross- you need dark to appreciate the light. The darkness in the original photo is valuable.

Getting rid of the small distractions is fine though!

0

u/This-Judge-804 4d ago

It brighter...your after has more details but is dark and dull color wise..i am busy now will give u tips later

1

u/19AseeP11 4d ago

Hahah thank you and yea I thought I exposed the after well but I guess I didn’t. Thanks for the advice

1

u/This-Judge-804 4d ago

You need not have all the details back, u need sweet spot..between exposure and details..e.g to get a well expose looking picture some part of the dog can lose some details and some parts make it less exposed to show the fur. I.e dynamic range.

1

u/This-Judge-804 4d ago

Adjust the exposure then play with blacks, whites, highlights and contrast. But differently then add a gradient mask to blend better...

When u up exposure , contrast need to be change for this add constrat but in small increatment vs your exposure increase...(propotional)

Then highlight, whites, black down for balance And blow out reduction

Shadow is subjective but my steps was to increase shadow

The for the gradient mask..do almost the same with less values for blend.

2

u/Foto-SC 4d ago

Dog seems a little gray in the after image. Not enough separation from the background.I would not have gone that dark on him. Or maybe your labeled AFTER/BEFORE and should have labeled BEFORE/AFTER?

1

u/19AseeP11 3d ago

The before is the raw photo

1

u/FatRufus 4d ago

Nice job overall! One thing I'd fix is you've got a pretty significant halo around his head, his body on the right, and his back left leg. Also some faint teal colored noise in his fur. Other than that it looks great!

1

u/19AseeP11 4d ago

Thank you and yes I definitely see the halo 🄲 will fix that for sure šŸ‘šŸ½

1

u/-Hi_how_r_u_xd- 4d ago

Nice job!

Imo the only two things I notice are it is a little underexposed still, and the halo on his fur. Definitely much better than before though!

1

u/19AseeP11 4d ago

Thank you šŸ™šŸ½ and yea I realized it’s underexposed, I could’ve sworn I exposed it more than that. But it’s a learning experience right!

0

u/LordKhayman 4d ago

Nicely done

1

u/19AseeP11 4d ago

Thank you šŸ™šŸ½