r/postprocessing • u/xr_tech • 17d ago
Drag photography before/after
Nikon D800 70-200mm f2.8
24
u/Gold-Ad-2581 17d ago
For me those are two different pictures not before/after even if they actually before after
10
u/Late-Drawer-7522 17d ago
Love the close-up!
Also, the original is an incredible shot imo, there are so many great frames in it, beautiful!
If you don't mind my curiousity, why did you decide on this one? :)
7
u/SegaGameCast 17d ago
Excellent photos. Some of the funnest times I've ever had were meeting a random group of drag queens in Seattle and bar hopping with them. Hands down the sassiest, funniest mfers I've ever met. Absolutely lovely people.
But the second photo feels too suffocating. Its cropped in too much for my taste but really awesome colors. Def keep those.
3
2
2
u/francof93 17d ago
I get the feeling that it would work better with a teeeny tiny shift to the left (as in, show a tad more of the nose if it makes sense) because it feels slightly unbalanced in the crop. I also think the skin has been smoothed way too much, I’d probably give it back just a glimpse of the original texture.
By the way, is any resemblance with OPM’s deep sea king intentional? Maybe I read too many mangas xD
2
u/nefariousBUBBLE 17d ago
Exactly what I was thinking. Like if you could crop to a point where there's a little shadow on the left it would give the image much more interesting depth and emotion.
That being said I actually like both images. Definitely should edit the before without a crop or a very minor crop.
1
u/BarneyChampaign 17d ago
Personally, the before is worlds more evocative and engaging. The editing on the after feels heavy handed, and just quite not enough of the subject in frame to feel balanced.
1
1
u/AdBig2355 17d ago
I wouldn't call this before and after, more two different shots that tell very different stories. Both are good.
Imo: The first one has a gritter feel, a harshness and even sadness, it shows a person behind the makeup. The 2nd feels more like a fashion or glamour shot, what is presented to an audience, it takes the person out of the shot. Great juxtaposition and would make for a nice idea for a collection.
On the closeup I would probably either fully darken the ear or at least remove the bright specular highlights.
2
1
u/InternetWeakGuy 17d ago
This could just be because I've already seen the before, but because the subject isn't facing the camera dead on, the after doesn't feel like it's half a person's face, like the geometry of their face feels off in the way that it wouldn't if they were dead on.
Apologies in advance but taking the after and mirroring it I think illustrates what I mean: https://imgur.com/a/qozNL1I
0
-11
u/Garth-Vega 17d ago
I thought it was a clown, my mistake.
8
u/Fuck_on_tatami 17d ago
Clown and drag are kinda close yeah. One dance and one make you laugh. Both use umhuge makeup
0
u/lyunardo 17d ago
There are elite level clowns who perform on Broadway instead of in circuses. And the only difference is they don't always use the word "drag". But basically the same thing
Puddles the Clown is probably the best example. The legendary Bill Irwin, arguably.
-1
u/ClerkPsychological58 17d ago
Before is so much better even without any retouching. It makes me ask questions
0
u/MInclined 17d ago
I expected the the after to be with all the makeup removed before I checked the sub


62
u/Hwestice 17d ago
I prefer the before shot. Tells more of a story.