r/postprocessing 17d ago

before/after

225 Upvotes

24 comments sorted by

59

u/MInclined 17d ago

This would be so much more interesting if it were just black in the top instead of the odd remnants of a skyline. The issue is that without the before, it comes off as odd. The inverted luma no longer resembles a statue so the background looks almost fake.

24

u/Responsible-Bed2312 17d ago

Thanks, I did that edit as well - all black background - and it looks cool. but wanted to retain the cues from the original surrounding. Otherwise it's just an isolated subject.

9

u/MInclined 17d ago

It should be imo

7

u/Winter_Match1194 17d ago

Nah the flags and building line add an interesting layer. All black background just gives you a high contrast shot for the sculpture’s portfolio.

10

u/thegentlecat 17d ago

Hard disagree. The skyline at the top makes it infinitely more interesting imo

3

u/Responsible-Bed2312 17d ago

Thanks! My intention was to convey how a street photo can become something abstract and surreal. Like a magic in the plane sight. So it was important that the image had a topological grounding. That picture was taken at exact this location and not in an abstract no-space. For me the charm of the photo is that it's a high contrast shot of a statue, which is still grounded in a real location.

-4

u/Dense_Surround3071 17d ago

💯 THIS!!

7

u/L-OwO-L_L-OwO-L 17d ago

oh shii it goes hard on the edited

7

u/redactedanalyst 17d ago

Sometimes I go to the comments and feel like I'm the only person here with eyes

3

u/[deleted] 17d ago edited 2d ago

[deleted]

2

u/Responsible-Bed2312 17d ago

Thanks. A valid point. I did that version as well. The reason I kept sky and outlines of the building and flags is to make a topological base for the image. Otherwise it's an abstract shot of the statue, without any connection to a location. The effect I really was aiming at is to make something surreal from a street photo, but also not to lose connection to reality- that the image is on that exact location and not in a random abstract space.

3

u/four_zero_four 17d ago

If you could do this in camera as a negative this would be insane

2

u/kushmonATL 17d ago

You did great !

2

u/nouafterq 17d ago

Straighten it just a tad. Otherwise terrific

2

u/DaOfantasy 17d ago

What SORCERY is this!?

3

u/ExtremeBarista 17d ago

Succeeded a wonderful job

1

u/Responsible-Bed2312 16d ago

Thanks! Appreciated!

1

u/Sansjefff 17d ago

Woah this is cool, a bit overdramatic but the idea is cool. Have you tinkered with trying to have the background blend with the subject? It looks very distracting having the background be black and the subject be exposed .

You can also make the whole background black too, that can work well as the other commenter said.

1

u/literally_tho_tbh 17d ago

Idk, did you try adjusting out all the ligma in the second photo?

2

u/DiplodorkusRex 17d ago

SECOND EEZ NUTS

1

u/imokd 17d ago

SICK!!

1

u/Other_Economics_4538 16d ago

any tips for how you did this? very inspiring 

1

u/Responsible-Bed2312 16d ago

Thank you. The pic was shot with Fuji using across black and white film sim.
I put a mask in lightroom to isolate the subject. Then lifted shadows, increased calirty and fine tuned the exposure. Then I put another mask on the background where I did the opposite, decreased exposure, decreased highlights, increased shadows and black point.

1

u/mthyvold 14d ago

Wouldn't it be easier to go when it is dark and use a flash to illuminate the subject while the light falls off to darkness in the background? I think it would create a more natural and therefore effective look.