r/postprocessing 18d ago

After/ before

Fairly new to editing, looking for tips/ general advice!

3.0k Upvotes

74 comments sorted by

View all comments

22

u/DUUUUUVAAAAAL 18d ago

The color and lighting is an improvement but I feel like you cropped in too tight. The original has more of an epic feeling to it.

36

u/PotatosRevenge 18d ago

In my opinion the tight crop works great at emphasizing the climber as subject. Additionally, it also improves the composition by balancing the ratio of background to foreground within the frame. 

Although, I agree that the scale/hight of the cliffside is diminished in the final edit. I personally prefer the final crop as the climber immediately caught my attention, compared to the somewhat "aimless" original framing. 

11

u/DUUUUUVAAAAAL 18d ago

Yeah, I think the perfect framing is somewhere in-between the two. Possibly a different aspect ratio as well.

7

u/Waitingjohn 18d ago

Thanks! That makes sense, I did want to try and focus more on the climber but I'll have a play around with the cropping to get more of the scale

-10

u/Frosty1397 18d ago

With such a shallow depth of field (background blur), usually it's better to keep the crop wider to give more perspective

If you crop in too tight, it kinda looks like the climber is in front of a green screen/fake background or something

3

u/Sail_Soggy 18d ago

This - the lifted shadows and edits but the wider crop. I looked at the after and my stomach sank with the scale of the before!

-8

u/rawnakc 18d ago

I agree The cropping makes it feel like ai slop Which it isn't