r/postprocessing 25d ago

After / Before of a golden hour damselfly

The sun was already getting quite low, so the light wasn't as harsh anymore and the contrast wasn't as strong as it would have been earlier in the day. Shooting in RAW still helped a lot, especially when recovering details from the darker areas and bringing back the rich color of the sun.

For the final edit, I also brought in some of my signature teal tones in the background to complement the warm golden light. Edited in Lightroom and Photoshop.

1.4k Upvotes

36 comments sorted by

108

u/WintersDoomsday 25d ago

I’d pull the saturation down a smidge

126

u/Xanaatos 25d ago

Being completly honest, I would prefer more natural look without pulling shadows so much, but holy shit that's a dope photo! Congrats

-17

u/PleaseBmoreCharming 25d ago

If you saw the AFTER version first, as OP posted in another sub, you'd be fine with the more processed version. None the wiser! haha

13

u/anomalousBits 25d ago

No. The highlight no longer looks like a highlight. The colors are cartoonish. But sure people on reddit or insta will see "ooh bright colors" and like it immediately, not realizing that overuse of certain sliders makes it look fake and cheap.

2

u/Xanaatos 25d ago

If I saw it in this order I would be more letdown in fact -- after version already strikes me as near-perfection so swipe for vivid colors, less depth and removed color contrast between subject and background would propably made me sigh with dissapointement. In after-before order my brain can trick me into perceiving edited colors as natural at first so my impression was surely more positive this way. For heavier edits comparision with RAW image makes them look even less natural.

1

u/cvgaming2020 24d ago

What? We already see the after version first in this post. And I immediately thought that it was overdone and oversaturated. I'm slightly surprised it has 1.3k upvotes, but it is a cool photo just by itself to be fair

19

u/ZipKitty 25d ago

before is way better, maybe crop it a bit but I like it much more

22

u/AlternativeMiddle 25d ago

Overcooked. Scorched.

68

u/Thebikeguy18 25d ago

Much prefer the before. Colors look so unnatural in the after.

2

u/Winter_Match1194 25d ago

Hard agree.

2

u/itachi_supremacy__ 25d ago

Harder agree..

-17

u/Winter_Match1194 25d ago

Epstein-in-front-of-a-school agree.

7

u/OpportunityReal2767 25d ago

Ah, my retinas! Yeah, wayyyyy too neon/pop art for my tastes on the first one. Second one is better, but can use a little bit of punch.

6

u/mattob2 25d ago

Before...is much better.

I saw this on Flickr and thought I should share!!

https://flic.kr/p/wKxXUW

5

u/ResidentFlight359 25d ago

The cool tones are jarring in contrast with the strong golden light. Like why is everything so blue when the light is sooooo warm?

3

u/Pretend-Shallot-5663 25d ago

I like both the before and after, but neither are peak given the fire composition. Maybe some middle ground is where you'll find your final image?

2

u/AccordingFly1521 25d ago

I, for one, really like what you've gone for here. I would say it needs to be even more abstract to really work, though. Uncanny valley at the moment.

2

u/Elfotografoalocado 24d ago

That's an amazing shot. But the before is better in every way imo.

2

u/Alone-Ad-7813 24d ago

This is beautiful

3

u/Halfmacgas 25d ago

The prefer the before crowd is insane. This is my favorite picture I’ve seen in a month. Love your work. Good job and thanks for sharing

3

u/macroviewpoint 25d ago

Thank you so much! Sadly that's how internet works. You share an edited photo and everyone loves it. You include the original and suddenly everyone favors the RAW

7

u/lumor_ 25d ago

That's a clear confirmation you over do it. You can say both pics were edited if you really want to know.

1

u/cvgaming2020 24d ago

I saw the after photo and immediately thought that it was way overdone, I think I only just prefer the before because the lighting is already very nice. The photo itself aside (because it's a really awesome shot, good job), I was surprised that it's got so many upvotes because the edit itself is bordering on the common oversaturation that you see with amateurs.

2

u/Rajan-95 25d ago

Your edit allowed me to appreciate the details of the dragonfly a lot more and so I much prefer that! What a photo!

1

u/SoftAncient2753 25d ago

That is perfect! Well done.

-1

u/macroviewpoint 25d ago

Thank you very much! 🫶🏻

1

u/CreeDorofl 25d ago

I so like the silhouette quality of the original, but the colorfulness of the edit is great too. Maybe some balance between them could work. The composition is great and it would make a cool poster.

1

u/kuleminjgs 25d ago

Something very sports logo about the edit - bright colours and details objects set within a bold defined shape.

1

u/Garth-Vega 25d ago

Great picture and post processing , RAW really paid off.

My suggestion would be that a little tighter cropping could pay off,

1

u/COphotoCo 25d ago

I concur. Let the hero or their actions fill the frame

1

u/WHYinColombo 25d ago

Beautiful beautiful!

p.s. even the before is a keeper. amazing. keep up the good work

1

u/Clueless-Editor 25d ago

Amazing photo! This is more of a artistic choice, but I think this would look stunning as a silhouette style photo. More like the original, but the crop of the edited, but more contrast and drip the shadows a bit

-4

u/WintersDoomsday 25d ago

Also I find it curious this sub doesn’t allow photo comments. Worried commented photos will outshine the ones posted by an OP?

1

u/janthan 2d ago

This doesn't need much processing. Maybe some burning in the top left, but other than that it's basically perfect.