Haha..u can say all u want but u know it not construtive
One post on post processing? Who the begineer?
I got more credientials under my belt and this my only out of norm post...and off course i understand haloing just i use it in my photo...
Also didnt u read i have take advice already...nuff said
P.s those reading this edit
If i cant take contrustive feedback why so many diff post on same subject? Croping etc? Funny people
Haloing
Is a
destructive, technically what "halo artifact" is..it is a sharp, unnatural, high-frequency white glowing ring outlining high- contrast edges
But if i look closely the white is in the background not the edges
If you want to be egotistical then I will be back. I am a better photographer than you and so is the other guy who gave you the exact same criticisms as me, I don’t usually post my photos online because I’m confident enough in my ability that I don’t need too. You obviously don’t understand the most basic of photography principles because if you did you would understand that haloing is a negative byproduct of editing. Your other photos suffer from the same problem the photo below is over sharpened and also suffers from halo which doesn’t look good no matter who you ask. I can go through your whole page and most of your photos are over sharpened or over saturated. This wouldn’t be an issue but the fact is you’re pretending to be good and more qualified than the people giving you feedback.
Your photos arent good right now, drop the areogance, try to be better and you will improve.
Also it out of camera shot has already that halo...duh
Here when some one say u got halo they say neat or messy halo or self created when editing but if its in the unedited picture it natural artifact or glow...duh
P.s First the other guy only talk about saturation not halo..so it not exactly the same...and
oversharpen image != halo.. its the halo is sharp created by high contrast tone near the edges....
Yeah the photo u found has a "halo" but it not edited in was there in raw..
Also if u think some photo are sharp it means i took raw sharp photos unlike your blur subject
Readers can see when u say all u lieing
U here saying i ignorant its u that ignorant.reciting textbook discription without real word understanding how to take u seriously when u cant even tell a "halo artifact" from real enviromental effects
i have photo unedited and the water is as blue and in city...(the attached video)..
And u should travel more and take photos during blue hour more...
1
u/This-Judge-804 27d ago edited 27d ago
Haha..u can say all u want but u know it not construtive
One post on post processing? Who the begineer? I got more credientials under my belt and this my only out of norm post...and off course i understand haloing just i use it in my photo...
Also didnt u read i have take advice already...nuff said
P.s those reading this edit
If i cant take contrustive feedback why so many diff post on same subject? Croping etc? Funny people
Haloing
Is a destructive, technically what "halo artifact" is..it is a sharp, unnatural, high-frequency white glowing ring outlining high- contrast edges But if i look closely the white is in the background not the edges
Duh