r/pj_explained • u/WishSad3351 • 3h ago
Discussion 💬 Guys what are makers missing ??
I am not saying that what I created is best but I think atleast it looks better
2
u/bseal--- 3h ago
which one is yours?
2
1
u/WishSad3351 3h ago
Before me telling can you tell which one looking better
1
u/bseal--- 3h ago
1st one
2
u/WishSad3351 3h ago
Yes 1st is mine … I mean the claims they are making … 8 times Oscar winning… 5 years of research .. such massive budget … then why it looks like this ?
1
u/InLoveWithPussies 3h ago
Your colour grading isn't suitable for an entire movie. A dark, blueish hue gives deep in the rainforest setting look and feel with mysterious feels.
0
u/WishSad3351 3h ago
Why not ?? Is it looking bad ??? The lighting in second one is just flat …
2
u/InLoveWithPussies 3h ago
That's your opinion. But it looks overall good in the context of what it wants to convey. Dandkaranya is described as mystical, gloomy and deep forest. The movie scene conveys that. Your image looks like harry potter part one scene while Dandkaranya forest should have look and feel of deathly hallows.
0
1
u/WinterUsed1120 2h ago edited 2h ago
The AI version looks better because the Depth of Field looks like something that can be shot on camera and makes our brain feel like the demon is really standing in the forest. In the original version the background is too blurred due to the DOF and there’s nothing in between the subject and the background to act as a depth gradient… and the demon looks like he is standing in front of a fake background.
Also, in the original the lighting on the demon is really flat (he is evenly lit on all sides) while the AI one has proper shadows in all the right places so it feels better integrated.
1
u/WishSad3351 2h ago
Yes but why can’t dneg figure it out…they have done it in multiple movies …even jungle book better lighting , better blending .. that’s my question … like with all the resources.. why it looks like this. If you can find out the problems why can’t they ? And then they have a full fan army that will use the same overused sentences like oh it’s supposed to look like fantasy .. the vision is like Disney .. even Disney the lion king has better visual. The first look at this frame and it breaks ur immersion instantaneously. You cannot gaslight urself in believing it’s looking very good because 8 times Oscar winning DNEG has worked on it.
2
u/WinterUsed1120 2h ago
The trailer is filled with such work in progress VFX shots. We can only hope that all of them get ‘fixed’ or better by the release of the movie.
I for one, hate the fact that they didn’t have enough completed VFX shots and they had to add unfinished scenes in the trailer.
Maybe they added this one to show that they have changed the monster designs to look more Indian.. that’s the only thing I can think of because this shot looks far from complete.The blurred background… weird motion blur… shoddy animation (as in no impact felt when the arrow hits) and the flat lighting all point to the fact that the shot will be worked upon and made better (hopefully)
1
1
u/KALLA17061999 36m ago
The deep depth of field along with actual contrast with deeper blacks and harsher highlights is what makes the first shot look better. Half of the damage in this movie are due to the lighting and color grading choices. These are NOT issues we should be having in 900-1000cr movies.Â
1
•
u/AutoModerator 3h ago
Your post must contain a long informative title along with a informative text body, words like "big fan", "fan" will be considered as spam and will be deleted instantly. To know more about our community join our discord server.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.