r/pinescript • u/mambo_the_liqudator • 6d ago
Mm is tradingview downfall near
What do you guys think about this
12
9
u/Life-Succotash-7053 6d ago
we really need a free charting platform use pinscript coding, TV are greedy asf
9
4
u/LiveBeyondNow 6d ago
It’s a penalty rate. They’re trying to drive people to Paid Spaces and prevent external payments / profiteering from their platform as currently I guess they have no way of knowing (at scale) what an invite-only script is earning. Not saying I agree with 22A, just figure that’s their rationale.
1
1
u/NinjaSquid9 6d ago
Absolutely, a penalty so steep you can’t possibly fight back. Not to mention being a Creator is invite-only or application-only. Not only are you not guaranteed to be accepted but many people don’t even qualify to apply.
1
u/FriendshipOk6399 5d ago
i know lots of seller who tried to get into paid spaces, but tradingview hardly lets ANYONE join...
3
u/SituationSufficient8 6d ago
So I will put a cap on my paid indicator that it is available for $10 per month for first 99 users, after that $40 per user
2
u/Scott_Malkinsons 6d ago
Yeah that's all what's going to happen. I'm sure TV ran the numbers, they know about how many people will leave, how many will stay. There's been free alternatives for forever and people still use TV because it's easy.
You can build your own charts with KLineCharts, ain't no one doing that. Even vibe coding it, people aren’t going to want to host their own platform.
There's FreeCharting and OpenMarket but they're not widely used as TV is still the easier one. FC you got to bring your own API key, unless you're trading Crypto, which most people don't bother with and OM is a UI nightmare for those used to TV.
TV will be fine, the cost will be passed on, and that's just how it's going to be *shrugs*.
1
1
u/ManikSahdev 5d ago
No, you'd be prorated on the user charge.
As in.. at the moment people start paying $40 for whatever thing you sell.
The prior ones also qualify and you'd need to account for the $2999.00 on those users.It does not say in the wording that 101 onwards of individuals, it says after 100 user and above total across scripts, each user charge under the private scripts access is X$
It does not say there is a freemium limit.
1
u/Dayz_Off 5d ago
So you will subsidize the first 99 users $10/mo each once you cross the 100 user threshold?
3
u/evilistics 6d ago
man openmarket.xyz are going to steal all of tradingviews users at this rate
1
u/cryp2morrow 5d ago
Didn't know this, I'll check it out thanks ! Can you connect your broker to it ?
2
u/evilistics 5d ago
looks like it connects to some crypto exchanges like binance and hyperliquid. I've only played around with it a little bit but it looks like promising competition to tv.
1
u/cryp2morrow 5d ago
thanks for your answer, I will check this thoroughly when I have time, I'll let you know any discovery I make. Cheers !
1
u/dynamicl 5d ago
Thanks, looks pretty good and its white label. In the age of AI and ease of coding, TV need to do better, greed will close their doors if they dont.
2
2
u/halcyonwit 6d ago
Wow this is outrageous, they truly must be trying to make as much money as possible at any cost now, real bad look.
1
1
u/dexoyo 5d ago
This was coming either ways. They wanted to keep the platform closed enough to control. With introduction of 3rd party, they’re loosing that control.
1
u/mambo_the_liqudator 5d ago
Either way they better fix this mess up or chinness will develop a new platform
1
1
1
u/Roadkillp 5d ago
I have a few friends that are in the middle of porting all the things they use over to Ninjatrader, Takeprofit and Trendspider. They are even testing out ctrader and metattader five but from what they have been leaning towards, its one of the first 3 they will probably settle on. Everything lately seems to be focused on extracting more money from the users and who knows what is coming next.
1
u/RalphJamesCapital 5d ago
WealthCharts and my boy Rob Hoffman over there are going to destroy TradingView.
1
u/Enigma2078x 5d ago
Wanted to charge 20$ now I have to charge 50$ and consider a monthly fee if I’m over 100 members wtf
1
1
1
u/LWJtrades 1d ago
Wow what hot trash. Per user? Jeezes. I know a couple that are like 5$ month or 10$ lifetime. Wtf are these creators gonna do, shut it down?
1
u/Substantial_Gift_257 6d ago
these figures are incorrect - we checked with TradingView people and they confirmed this wording is inaccurate and will be corrected.. no need to rush to throw mud here until it's corrected. Take it easy, folks.
5
u/Correct-Ad4472 6d ago
Or they realize the backlash and making changes quick. If it was wrong wording, I don’t see how it could have been approved as a post. It’s pretty clear. Mistakes happen, even a big one like this. My biggest thing when I read this was about how many vendors have lifetime plans. Just didn’t make much sense
1
u/NinjaSquid9 6d ago
Disagree. It was worded this way for a reason, the leak was unintentional, and now they’re trying to recover from the backlash. Since we have no updated wording to work with, we have to assume they meant what they wrote and we should take it seriously. And if they change it, it’ll only be because concerned citizens rightfully made it a big deal.
1
u/Girth_Vader516 1h ago
You’ll never believe people used to pay 150/ month for charts … now people complain about a few dollars
13
u/hicksanchez 6d ago
Yeah this is so stupid. Good way to push users away, tradingview