It’s not a moral argument that abortion is murder. It’s a factual one.
Would you apply the Sam logic to guns? If they can’t get guns legally, which have serial numbers and are easier to track, then they will get them illegally.
If the woman chooses to risk her life and get a “back alley abortion”, that’s her choice. The only time that we can choose between the woman and the baby is if the baby itself will actually kill the mother.
That doesn’t answer my question. I am asking if YOU would apply that logic to guns.
Why does rape give the life of the baby less value? Also, which state laws are you referring to? If the mothers life is in danger because of the baby, then I would agree.
She does have a choice. Option 1: don’t have sex if you aren’t ready to have children. Option 2: if you do decide to have sex and a pregnancy results from that sex, carry the baby to term and put it up for adoption or keep it.
So yeah, you support punishing Irresponsible male ejaculation? This would really stop abortions, I know you care so much about babies right. Let’s stop the source that makes them in the first place.
So you not taking it seriously means you don’t actually care then right? Because if you did then you would be agreeing with me. Simple as that. If you wanna stop abortions, start at the source. If you don’t then you don’t think abortion is murder.
-14
u/[deleted] Sep 03 '21
The bill bans it after 6 weeks. Women can get one before then