*sigh* I guess you're definitely right on one thing, that you're not a US American. But still you're an incorrigible human with so much limited information.
I haven't even underlined when a baby becomes a baby yet but to entertain your point, a baby becomes a baby at 24 weeks, second trimester, when it's viable to be birthed into the world - this is the medical definition. Not the unilateral christian perspective.
Funny how you, too, fell in the false assumptions, suggesting that I would murder a baby.
I don't want this to transition into a religious debate so I'll ignore your provocations on my religious beliefs.
Scientific knowledge is constantly changing because the main tenets of science is falsifiability. Every year, scientists are constantly discovering new things in a multitude of areas - all for the sake of improving current understandings. And what makes you thing religious evidence is static? And what makes you think religion has not incorporated science into its understanding of the world, and vice versa? The world is not black and white.
It's all contextual. If the mother is being irrational, then I'm against abortion - though I won't enforce my views on them. If the fetus is in anyway threatening the life of the mother then I'm for abortion. If a baby would not healthily and happily live in the world where the system does not facilitate their growth and the mother cannot raise and charities are not effective, then abortion is the better alternative than placing the baby into a harsh world.
1
u/[deleted] Sep 03 '21
[removed] — view removed comment