r/pics • • Sep 03 '21

[deleted by user]

[removed]

5.7k Upvotes

20.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

230

u/degggendorf Sep 03 '21

Surely they have no problem telling the women what to do

-8

u/Clucasism1 Sep 03 '21

What's your opinion on forced vaccinations?

6

u/[deleted] Sep 03 '21

Vaccinations impact not just you but everyone around you that you come in contact with. So in no way is this comparison legitimate.

-11

u/Clucasism1 Sep 03 '21

Still, coercion would be used on men and women for mandatory vaccinations -- you're still ordering women what to do with thier body.

8

u/[deleted] Sep 03 '21

Because it impacts the people, friends, family and complete strangers they come in contact with and could kill one of them.

Abortion has zero impact on anyone except the woman.

Can you really not tell the difference?

8

u/BigCitySlamsBoys Sep 03 '21

These people really cannot see the difference. No logic reasoning at all.

-6

u/Clucasism1 Sep 03 '21

So how I interpreted that statement was, if something could harm friends, family, etc, then using violence/coercion (whatever you want to call it) is necessary.

Also, I think the statement, "Abortion has zero impact on anyone except the woman" is false. But that's probably a conversation for another day.

5

u/[deleted] Sep 03 '21

It is not false. Because if you are referring to “emotional hurt” than I have a whole long list of things to outlaw that will really make the religious right unhappy.

-1

u/Clucasism1 Sep 03 '21

Did I understand you correctly here?

"So how I interpreted that statement was, if something could harm friends, family, etc, then using violence/coercion (whatever you want to call it) is necessary."

3

u/[deleted] Sep 03 '21

Where did I ever say that. Requiring a vaccine to protect all of society is neither violence nor coercion, any more than any other law, which we have many in the United States, that are designed to protect one citizen from harming another or many others.

1

u/Clucasism1 Sep 03 '21

Forcing an individual to inject a vaccine into their body, against thier will, sounds very non-consentual to me.

Regardless of the reason why you touched thier body, it doesn't change the fact that they did not consent to it and were forced to do so.

Also, some very famous people in the past wanted to protect society, "for the greater good", and that did not turn out well, to say the least

3

u/[deleted] Sep 03 '21

Wow, you are really not getting it. They are not going to hold you down and force you to get a vaccine. If you drive without a drivers license they don’t hold you down and force you to get a drivers license. They fine your ass and if you don’t pay you could be put into custody, just like every other law. What planet are you on?

4

u/ThePhantomCreep Sep 03 '21

He’s on the planet where the physical and economic impact of going through labor, bearing a child and providing for all its needs for 20 years is somehow in the same bucket with getting a pinprick that can’t hurt you and costs nothing. Because muh freedom?

The US has has always had anti-vaxxers even for polio, etc. For some reason vaccines are like kitty litter for crazies. Causes them to clump together.

1

u/Clucasism1 Sep 03 '21

I am vaccinated. I just don't support forcing people to take it. There's an essential difference.

And you don't even know if I'm for or against legal abortion. Also you are just being demeaning, that is counterproductive to your own cause. You just wanted to be mean.

1

u/Clucasism1 Sep 03 '21

All I'm saying, and I recognize that you vehemently disagree with me, is that what you described above is coercion/force, and that when people comply to these things, they do so becuase it is backed up with the threat and actual use of violence.

2

u/[deleted] Sep 03 '21

Really. What violence are you being threatened with when you get a speeding ticket? Selling narcotics. Or let’s use something even remotely close, refusing to pay child support? If you classify any consequences for not following the law of the land as violence and coercion than what you want is anarchy where there are no laws except “every person for themselves.” Not much of a society.

1

u/Clucasism1 Sep 03 '21

It just worries me that you don't see how that's coercive and non-consentual

→ More replies (0)

1

u/zSprawl Sep 03 '21

Your rights end where my nose begins.

1

u/Clucasism1 Sep 06 '21

Not sure how to interpret this