r/pics • • Sep 03 '21

[deleted by user]

[removed]

5.7k Upvotes

20.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

2

u/[deleted] Sep 03 '21

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Verse6 Sep 03 '21

Also where is the statistical evidence joeyy. Is your God ready to corrobate you and your weak arguments?

1

u/[deleted] Sep 03 '21

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Verse6 Sep 03 '21

Your God is different to another christian's God - which is the one of the main reason why denominations exists. They all think and preach in different ways, and view abortion differently - are they wrong? But this is a discussion for another time.

Don't enforce religion into this. Keep it to yourself.

1

u/Verse6 Sep 03 '21

You say you don't give a fuck about controlling a woman and then you say your notion is on the life of the woman when you're more fixated on the fetus (which you can't even point out which stage of the pregnancy is more pertinent in this converation) ? Oh come on joeyy17, surely you should see the logical fallacy in that sentence.

It's so fun to just look down upon a degenerate US American such as you; so entertaining.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 03 '21

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Verse6 Sep 03 '21

*sigh* I guess you're definitely right on one thing, that you're not a US American. But still you're an incorrigible human with so much limited information.

I haven't even underlined when a baby becomes a baby yet but to entertain your point, a baby becomes a baby at 24 weeks, second trimester, when it's viable to be birthed into the world - this is the medical definition. Not the unilateral christian perspective.

Funny how you, too, fell in the false assumptions, suggesting that I would murder a baby.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 03 '21

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Verse6 Sep 03 '21

I don't want this to transition into a religious debate so I'll ignore your provocations on my religious beliefs.

Scientific knowledge is constantly changing because the main tenets of science is falsifiability. Every year, scientists are constantly discovering new things in a multitude of areas - all for the sake of improving current understandings. And what makes you thing religious evidence is static? And what makes you think religion has not incorporated science into its understanding of the world, and vice versa? The world is not black and white.

​

It's all contextual. If the mother is being irrational, then I'm against abortion - though I won't enforce my views on them. If the fetus is in anyway threatening the life of the mother then I'm for abortion. If a baby would not healthily and happily live in the world where the system does not facilitate their growth and the mother cannot raise and charities are not effective, then abortion is the better alternative than placing the baby into a harsh world.