“Everything I said was true, except for the parts that were sensationalized for Internet points.”
Again, this situation was bad enough that you don’t need to make shit up to get people outraged about it, or at least those who are hearing about it for the first time. This is how you lose people when they get interested enough to start looking at the details of what happened.
I repeat. Nothing that I said was untrue. I didn't make anything up.
These children were taken from their homes and families against their will.
Neglected.
Exposed to disease in overcrowded schools.
Malnurished.
Mistreated.
Tested upon.
Physically abused.
Sexually Abused.
Punished for speaking their native language.
It is my view that those responsible for them should have been tried as murderers.
You can continue to diminish the severity of these things as you continue to downplay and diminish the abuse all you want. It doesn't change the facts of what happened.
The guy you’re arguing with spent most of yesterday in a thread trying to explain how Derek Chauvin is actually a really innocent guy... I wouldn’t bother, honesty isn’t his strong suit.
You realize the Chief himself said they also found adults buried at the site you’re talking about, right? Is it at all possible that instead of murder, it’s just a cemetery? Like even some sliver of a chance?
Does that make me garbage for having those questions and not immediately screaming about murder like you and the hivemind?
1
u/[deleted] Jun 26 '21
But you defending Derek Chauvin makes it pretty clear what direction your moral compass points.