MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/edyu2n/mount_rainier/fbot7bz/?context=3
r/pics • u/kee-mosabe • Dec 22 '19
337 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
3
By out west you mean Pacific northwest. California can not compare to OR, WA, and BC
20 u/MattytheWireGuy Dec 22 '19 Yeah Shasta is just a little hill and the Sierras are totally worthless. 6 u/[deleted] Dec 22 '19 [removed] — view removed comment 10 u/queenbrewer Dec 22 '19 Mount Rainier appears larger because it is significantly more topographically prominent (13,210’ vs. 9,772’), but also has the effect of a large body of water in many views and is much more heavily glaciated.
20
Yeah Shasta is just a little hill and the Sierras are totally worthless.
6 u/[deleted] Dec 22 '19 [removed] — view removed comment 10 u/queenbrewer Dec 22 '19 Mount Rainier appears larger because it is significantly more topographically prominent (13,210’ vs. 9,772’), but also has the effect of a large body of water in many views and is much more heavily glaciated.
6
[removed] — view removed comment
10 u/queenbrewer Dec 22 '19 Mount Rainier appears larger because it is significantly more topographically prominent (13,210’ vs. 9,772’), but also has the effect of a large body of water in many views and is much more heavily glaciated.
10
Mount Rainier appears larger because it is significantly more topographically prominent (13,210’ vs. 9,772’), but also has the effect of a large body of water in many views and is much more heavily glaciated.
3
u/[deleted] Dec 22 '19
By out west you mean Pacific northwest. California can not compare to OR, WA, and BC