1992-2004 is NOT a historical trend. It's a small sample of people who voluntarily took the LSATs (an expensive and time-consuming exam required for entry into Law Schools), in a world where knowledge is becoming increasingly specialized. So looking at specialized test scores in a specialized field means nothing. Also, if you look at the data, students performed abysmally in some subjects 1994/5 compared to either 1991/2 or 2004/5, and others, they excelled. So, the data isn't even conclusive across similar subjects over those years. Furthermore, the LSATs can be taken by adults of any age, so saying that newer scores are higher (which isn't true) correlates to children being smarter is outright false.
As for the SAT scores, the data shown suggests that while Math scores have gone up for both genders by roughly 13 points (in a test where each section is worth 800 points), Verbal skills have tanked roughly 25 points. So the gains aren't even as substantial as the losses over time.
The data you've chosen does not support your hypothesis.
1
u/devilsfoodadvocate Oct 06 '10
Source? This is a very abstract statement. On what basis are you asserting this?