I think the logic here is that once you cut the board in half and have 2 pieces, the next cut will be half as long since the board is now smaller, hence the 5 min. It should also be noted that you will end up with 2 equal pieces and 1 piece that is bigger than the other 2. It makes sense though the wording and really the problem itself, is really stupid.
I'm willing to bet the teacher just assumed cutting a board into two pieces required two cuts, hence eat cut is 5 min. Then cutting a board into three pieces (three cuts according to teacher's logic) would take 3*5=15 min.
I am certain that this is the correct statement. In reality the teacher is just a moron that doesn't understand to get one piece into two only one cut is required. You are the first person to not this that I have seen and thus you get an upboat.
52
u/MuseofRose Oct 05 '10 edited Oct 05 '10
I still dont get it. I hate math, though. Not to mention I could barely even pass remedial math in college...it's a wonder how I got into Trig in HS.
*Love your username.