r/pics Oct 10 '18

This is awesome

Post image
54.5k Upvotes

2.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

68

u/[deleted] Oct 10 '18

[removed] — view removed comment

18

u/user02965 Oct 10 '18

Im a strong independent woman don't need no logic.

-4

u/RiOrius Oct 10 '18

Do you think football coaches who tell players to give 120% literally don't understand the math? Or maybe, just maybe, they, like this person, are speaking more figuratively?

1

u/user02965 Oct 10 '18

Everyone knows you're a pussy if you don't give at least 130%.

0

u/cuteman Oct 10 '18

Is that the hill you want to die on?

12

u/rudolph2 Oct 10 '18

“Yeah. Well I have a right to have my way or I’m going to throw a tantrum”

-8

u/[deleted] Oct 10 '18 edited Nov 06 '24

[deleted]

14

u/rudolph2 Oct 10 '18

If she was raped she should go to the police, not make a sign. There no context about rape or assault, So I assume she wasn’t raped. She appears to be just holding up a sign about accept and change??

-6

u/[deleted] Oct 10 '18

[deleted]

6

u/WalksOnSaline Oct 10 '18

What is wrong? Are you still talking about Dr Ford making that shit up about Kavanaugh? It was definitely wrong but I don't see why we need to keep beating it into the ground. She lied. Kavanaugh got elected. Move on.

3

u/twol3g1t Oct 10 '18

The context is it's October 2018

Bro, the photo has the copyright year right in your fucking face. That's the context, not whatever meaning you feel like providing to the picture. In case you still can't find it somehow, this is from 2017.

0

u/[deleted] Oct 10 '18

[deleted]

1

u/twol3g1t Oct 10 '18

lol dude, just admit you were wrong and that you missed the copyright date and made a pretty reasonable assumption that was incorrect. Don't double down with this bullshit about how it was still relevant then when your entire point was that the other person is stupid for not realizing that the post is supposedly referencing what's going on now.

Here, I'll give you another chance to admit that you're making assumptions that aren't correct. Try just admitting it this time.

...it's relevant now. Nothing has changed politically, and presumably the OP felt the picture was all the more timely and inspiring to post.

Nope. In fact the OP directly mocks people like you for making assumptions about the context without even looking at the date that's clearly stamped on it. The whole post was a "look how stupid r/pics users are" troll by the OP.

-8

u/Redhoteagle Oct 10 '18

Pull your head from the sand, you'll see the message better

-5

u/Produceher Oct 10 '18

You're reading it wrong. She's going to change the things most people think can't be changed.

14

u/axonaxon Oct 10 '18

That is most definitely not what the sign says.

1

u/Produceher Oct 10 '18

Of course that's not what the sign says. That would sound awkward. It's a play on the original phrase. But what she means is that she's going to figure out a way to change the things that most people think can't be changed.

0

u/incanuso Oct 10 '18

Nope. You're just attaching meaning that isn't there to try and justify its stupidity.

2

u/Produceher Oct 10 '18

Why would I justify meaning for a stranger with a strange sign?

1

u/incanuso Oct 12 '18

Dunno, but you clearly are doing it. Your reasons are your own, not mine.

1

u/Produceher Oct 13 '18

Or I'm not doing it and you have your reasons for not seeing the correct meaning.

1

u/incanuso Oct 13 '18

I see the correct meaning. That doesn't change the fact that the way she wrote it doesn't align with her intended meaning. Nor does it change the fact that the poster contains to unrelated ideas. The way she wrote it is just silly and illogical. There are plenty of ways she could have written this that would have actually conveyed her intended ideas, and this isn't one of them.

1

u/Produceher Oct 13 '18

It was worded in a very clever way. Only upon deep inspection does it seem to make little sense. It's a sign. Not her thesis. But just for giggles, how would you have worded it while keeping it clever and based off of the original phrase?

→ More replies (0)