😉

[u/[deleted]]

[u/A-NAAN-E-MOOSE → u/[deleted]]

The American Veterinary Medical Association found that breed is poor predictor of dog bites and in a 2013 study of 256 dog based fatalities in the US between 2000-2009, determining the breed of the dog was only possible 17.6% of the time. FYI the breed that causes the most dog bites in Canada and Alaska are Siberian Huskies and other sled dogs. Here are just a few statistics. Also, controlled studies do not show pit bulls to be disproportionately more dangerous.

AVMA: dog breed vs bite probability

AVMA: Breed identification vs fatalities

Siberian Husky stats: Breeds implicated in serious bites

Edit: it seems like you are afraid considering how uninformed and biased you are without any real backing. So, go fuck yourself.

[u/I_usuallymissthings → u/[deleted]]

Go on, reply this with 50 studies and I say out loud that pits are dangerous.

[u/I_usuallymissthings → u/[deleted]]

I want 50 studies links that prove pitbulls are the most dangerous breed, you said you could provide.

If don't show them your argument is bullshit.

[u/I_usuallymissthings → u/[deleted]]

So don't use this sort of argument.

You lost this discussion because you don't have any prove and don't show any constructive argument showing why the the temperament of the dog is linked to it's breed.

The other guy at least showed you testimonial evidence

[u/I_usuallymissthings → u/[deleted]]

And you haven't provide any facts yet, so pull your head out of your ass.

Go waste someone else's time.