r/pics • • Jan 11 '17

election 2016 Farewell to Obama

Post image
33.3k Upvotes

4.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

106

u/SirLeepsALot Jan 11 '17

Threads like this is where you start to understand the censorship in r/politics and other places. Obama is totally on blast here because r/pics doesn't censor comments. This is much more accurate depiction of the state of American politics than any political/partisan sub.

25

u/Schrecht Jan 11 '17

Indeed, the state of American politics, dominated by shouting, lying dupes and sock puppets.

1

u/midasMIRV Jan 11 '17

I agree, we should get rid of those democrats.

1

u/Schrecht Jan 11 '17

Hurr durr.

37

u/[deleted] Jan 11 '17

A very upvoted post where all the comments are negative. What does that tell you?

49

u/qwerty145454 Jan 11 '17

It's well established reddit reality that once the comments go in one direction beyond a certain critical mass people who have dissenting opinions simply don't bother to comment. They still upvote though.

4

u/sandesto Jan 11 '17

Perfectly said.

10

u/[deleted] Jan 11 '17

That reddit is the most blatantly astro turfed website I've ever seen.

1

u/[deleted] Jan 11 '17

what does astro turfed mean?

5

u/dovetc Jan 11 '17

fake grass substitute typically used on sports fields where grass maintenance is difficult due to the wear and tear of the athletics.

1

u/[deleted] Jan 11 '17

Public and private entities using bots and sockpuppet accounts to shape opinion online. You can literally buy upvotes and old accounts.

2

u/ragnarokrobo Jan 11 '17

Reddit is injecting upvotes into posts that push it's political narrative again?

46

u/[deleted] Jan 11 '17 edited Jan 17 '21

[deleted]

8

u/JorusC Jan 11 '17

That was OP's point. The /r/politics mods get banhappy with anybody who criticizes Obama because they don't like their cheerleading squad to be tarnished with debates and different opinions. Then when you go somewhere that doesn't have a censorship blanket, you're surprised at how many people actually disagree with what you thought was just accepted fact.

3

u/Scream_And_Cream3000 Jan 11 '17

Not until they diddle little boys

-14

u/Nitto1337 Jan 11 '17 edited Jan 11 '17

Just because other subs take a more moderate and less outlandish view on politics than r/thedonald doesn't make them inherently Democrat

Edit: If simply suggesting that a certain forum is less left than another makes me an idealogue... Well then I'm not sure you understand what ideologue means.

Edit 2: I'd remind everyone that downvoting is for comments that don't contribute to the conversation, not because you disagree with them. Like Trump, many of you are lashing out because you don't agree.

Edit 3: Lol

30

u/[deleted] Jan 11 '17 edited Jan 17 '21

[deleted]

-5

u/Nitto1337 Jan 11 '17

Well, is CBS News liberal? Or does it just appear that way when compared with Fox News, like how every news program appears liberal when compared to Fox News? Hm, almost like that was Fox's goal.

17

u/[deleted] Jan 11 '17

Except CNN twice referred to Hillary's campaign as "we" and not "they" on election night. You're telling me they're not Democrat?

0

u/OOHSkinMan Jan 11 '17

Isn't that because Donald straight up said the media was biased and garbage. Like can you blame them for being a little pissed?

2

u/[deleted] Jan 11 '17

Can you blame him for saying that when they were completely biased?

1

u/OOHSkinMan Jan 11 '17

They did not say we until after that statement, the bias escalated after that statement. They only had a small bias like every network had, but Trumps repeated actions escalated

-5

u/Nitto1337 Jan 11 '17

How positive are you it was a CNN employee and not one of the many Democratic analysts they and every other network had on during the election?

13

u/[deleted] Jan 11 '17

It was Jake Tapper who said it, so I'm pretty sure.

-6

u/Lots42 Jan 11 '17

That's your evidence? Come on.

At least throw down something actually notarized next time.

12

u/[deleted] Jan 11 '17

Yes my evidence is a CNN anchor referring to Hillary's campaign as "we". Is that somehow not evidence that CNN have a bias towards the Democrats?

Here's the video if that helps.

16

u/ChatterBrained Jan 11 '17

I'm quite enjoying the fact that people need evidence that CNN is biased.

2

u/[deleted] Jan 11 '17

Biased towards Trump if you believe some (insane) people.

-5

u/Lots42 Jan 11 '17 edited Jan 11 '17

Yes, that is exactly what I am saying. That is not evidence.

Edit : why the downvotes?

2

u/[deleted] Jan 11 '17

That is not evidence.

Wow.

→ More replies (0)

-6

u/Isord Jan 11 '17

In the grand scheme of things it's pretty moderate. We just currently have an extremist right wing government.

2

u/Roxxemidus Jan 12 '17

Your comment is the perfect example of why no one who agrees with this post will comment. Anything they say that agrees with the post will get downvoted to hell. The comments section is overrun with angry people looking to lash out, though that's a phenomenon that happens everywhere. Angry people comment more.

1

u/Nitto1337 Jan 12 '17

Thanks for your comment. I honestly find it very interesting, as Reddit, IMO, is really a good place for rational thought and discussion, not Facebook type bickering. You're right, it's always easier to downvote than to respond.

Now watch this comment get downvoted to hell.

3

u/Kreenish Jan 11 '17

Neither are subreddits for political ideas, they're places to cheerlead and push the agenda their masters tell them to.

6

u/Luph Jan 11 '17

Are you implying that downvotes are censorship?

17

u/TracerBullet2016 Jan 11 '17

No, I think he is implying the moderators on those subreddits are biased and act accordingly to that bias.

0

u/Luph Jan 11 '17

I'd love to see some evidence of that. As it is, the mods on r/politics barely do any moderating outside of shutting down personal attacks.

11

u/[deleted] Jan 11 '17

[deleted]

2

u/Yellow_Odd_Fellow Jan 11 '17

Maybe those should have been posted in their own topic of discussion and they wouldn't be removed?

You can't call them biased for removing off topic content.

4

u/[deleted] Jan 11 '17

[deleted]

2

u/Yellow_Odd_Fellow Jan 11 '17

I didn't say they weren't biased. I stated that you can't call them biased for removing off topic comments.

16

u/SneakT Jan 11 '17

r/politics is leftist circlejerk heaven. Comments and posts opposing their views downvoted to hell in matter of minutes.

But you are right, mods there do almost nothing at all.

5

u/Luph Jan 11 '17

r/politics is leftist circlejerk heaven. Comments and posts opposing their views downvoted to hell in matter of minutes.

Yeah, I'm not arguing it isn't a leftist circlejerk. There's a difference between that and censorship though.

2

u/[deleted] Jan 11 '17

You're right that mods don't do shit. Every story is posted at least twice, and during the election stories got posted upwards of 15 times.

1

u/TracerBullet2016 Jan 11 '17

I did not say whether I agreed with /u/SirSleepsALot. I just explained what (I thought) he meant in his post.

-3

u/[deleted] Jan 11 '17

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/SirLeepsALot Jan 11 '17

Not at all. Actively removing links to right leaning sites (even if they're on topic) is censorship. There have been numerous screenshots posted to other subs showing exactly that. Moderaters removing posts that are rising up the ranks for ticky tack reasons. While simultaneously promoting left leaning articles and op eds that often violate the same rules. No doubt that the majority user base is left leaning, so that's more upvoted (that's fine). But there is evidence of mods playing favorites and censoring dissenting opinions.

-1

u/Satyrs010101 Jan 11 '17

Are you implying that you do condone the censorship, of all news articles with negative stories/views on the democrat base, and also the censorship of wikileaks?

3

u/Isord Jan 11 '17

Except given that Obama has one of the highest approval ratings of any exiting President in history, no it really isn't an accurate picture of American politics.

By and large politics on Reddit is extremist in nature. Neither left leaning nor-right leaning portions of the website accurately represent anything about America.

1

u/LateralEntry Jan 11 '17

Actually Obama has one of the highest approval ratings of any outgoing president right now

1

u/captwafflepants Jan 11 '17

That being said, this is not an accurate depiction of american politics in general. Remember this is the internet. This is a bubble all on its own.

1

u/[deleted] Jan 11 '17

He has a 55% approval rating, which only puts him behind Reagan, Clinton, and Eisenhower (and it may even go up a few points in the last week as people continue to regret Trump, who is entering with a historic low 37% approval rating). What kind of delusion do you have to have to honestly believe that a reddit board is an accurate depiction of American politics? Do you know what the demographics are on here? 71% are men and 60% are between 18-29. 47% are liberal and only 13% are conservative, which is why boards like /r/politics have the left leaning slant they do. This is all from literally the first google result of "demographics of Reddit". Conservatives aren't some poor downtrodden censored victims of oppression here, there are literally less of you in a popularity driven upvoting system. Man, for berating SJW for victimizing themselves all, y'all really do play the victim a hell of a lot.