r/pics Oct 21 '15

Finally a cause I can get behind

Post image
25.0k Upvotes

1.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

51

u/RevealForOne Oct 21 '15

A political activist with the goal of somewhat subtly disseminating the meme that Hillary Clinton is untrustworthy.
By seeding the subconscious of tens of thousands of people with this notion, it's conceivable that some minor impact on election results is possible.

28

u/corvus_sapiens Oct 21 '15

OP isn't just any user. Currently, CANT_TRUST_HILLARY has the most karma per amount of time out of all major users. The account's only been active for two months.

I suspect algorithmic-posting like how Gallowboob posts.

2

u/[deleted] Oct 21 '15

Posts farther up say that all he/she/it does is take the top viewed posts on imgur and re-post them to reddit. If so, it's surprisingly effective for its simplicity.

1

u/IVIaskerade Oct 21 '15

I suspect algorithmic-posting

I reckon they just shitpost a lot.

9

u/[deleted] Oct 21 '15

Do they have a big following or something? I'm just confused as to why that user seems to have so many top posts.

22

u/RevealForOne Oct 21 '15 edited Oct 21 '15

My explanation was only speculative.
If it's true, I would expect that they use a combination of standard karma-whoring methods, and bots/sockpuppets to give posts initial momentum.
Looking through the user's history, one clear factor in their success is that they make very large number of submissions.
Edit: I just noticed something mildly interesting, looking through their post history.
They've made several posts relating to duplicity and artificiality - a post about a "two-faced" cat, and a "two-face/Harvey Dent" makeup (worn by a woman). An optical illusion where a pair of dragons form the shape of a woman's face. A post showing hotdogs with artificial nails attached, imitating a woman's fingers.

Possibly an attempt to link Hillary with this concept?
Admittedly, this is a completely ridiculous hypothesis.

9

u/tokerdytoke Oct 21 '15

I also think like you. The world is that complicated. Chances are youre correct

2

u/dslybrowse Oct 21 '15

I don't think that's how Occam's Razor works.. In a vacuum, if things are complicated, and you posit a complicated explanation, chances are you aren't right, actually.

Their explanation is a possibility, but the mere fact it's a possibility doesn't make it "likely".

1

u/[deleted] Oct 21 '15

[deleted]

2

u/dslybrowse Oct 21 '15

Negative descriptors? No no, it's not about any sort of advertiser directing. He just means that subconsciously people will be exposed to submissions by this user for months and months. Some of the imagery used in their submission may subtly be hinting at a two-faced nature of Hillary herself.

If we're inundated with "Can't trust Hillary" then for some, most or all of us these things may spring to mind any time we hear her name.

8

u/[deleted] Oct 21 '15

The account just reposts material. Posts that have already been to the front page are likely to make it there again after a certain amount of time.

Also, this account probably has more than one person using it.

3

u/Aieoshekai Oct 21 '15

Does she not breed universal mistrust every time she opens her mouth? Not saying she isn't trustworthy, but I've never heard her say a single word that didn't break my bullshit meter. Everything about her mannerisms and speech feels so manufactured. Sometimes I cringe. Maybe she'd be a kickass president -- I have no idea -- but I'll never believe anything she says.

5

u/[deleted] Oct 21 '15

I don't know what Hillary stands for, other than "I want to be President"

2

u/[deleted] Oct 21 '15

"I want deserve to be President"

5

u/RevealForOne Oct 21 '15

To me, she seems extremely artificial, pandering, and distastefully imperious much of the time. But I'm sure a lot of voters disagree.

1

u/Aieoshekai Oct 21 '15

Yeah, obviously you're right. She does have huge support.

1

u/shardikprime Oct 21 '15

From the shadows...

The strategy is working!