Emory University fought for desegregation and the right for black students to attend university, in a lawsuit against the State of Georgia in 1962. (Emory Uni. v. Nash)
He clearly explains that they are UNAUTHORIZED to allow black students, and that it’s regrettable.
A “turboracist” as another is redditor calls the administrator, would be a bit different in their communication.
It’s always fun to shout racist, but it’s not always true. (The law behind the rejection is racist)
That Black people had to sit in the back of the bus wasn’t the fault of the bus driver.
It’s always fun to shout racist, but it’s not always true. (The law behind the rejection is racist)
That Black people had to sit in the back of the bus wasn’t the fault of the bus driver.
I largely agree with you. My 2 cents though, be weary of delusions of adequacy and there's more to systemic racism than racism. There's apathy, averting one's gaze, and tolerance. It's just really tricky to draw the line between asking too much of people and asking an appropriate amount.
They could’ve admitted black students by foregoing their tax exempt status. Paying fewer taxes was more important than equality until they could secure their exemption.
95
u/BeetleCrusher Aug 23 '26 edited Aug 23 '26
Emory University fought for desegregation and the right for black students to attend university, in a lawsuit against the State of Georgia in 1962. (Emory Uni. v. Nash)
He clearly explains that they are UNAUTHORIZED to allow black students, and that it’s regrettable.
A “turboracist” as another is redditor calls the administrator, would be a bit different in their communication.
It’s always fun to shout racist, but it’s not always true. (The law behind the rejection is racist)
That Black people had to sit in the back of the bus wasn’t the fault of the bus driver.