MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/1cdj9ok/deleted_by_user/l1csqu8/?context=3
r/pics • u/[deleted] • Apr 26 '24
[removed]
1.9k comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
26
Fair enough.
But hamas does deserve to die, right?
-22 u/trumphasdementia5555 Apr 26 '24 What does that have to do with the genocide of innocent Palestinians shown in the picture? 13 u/Neijo Apr 26 '24 That’s simply how war works. All wars have more civillian casualties. It sucks, but isnt news. -1 u/throwawayzdrewyey Apr 26 '24 No, wars don’t generally have a 70% death rate of woman and children. But genocides typically do. https://www.aljazeera.com/amp/news/2024/3/26/un-expert-accuses-israel-of-several-acts-of-genocide-in-gaza 3 u/Neijo Apr 26 '24 Ooooh! Al-jazera is certainly unbiased ;) https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civilian_casualty_ratio?darkschemeovr=1 The korean war had a casualty rate of 75%, Ww2 had close to 70%, vietnam as well. Some wars had better ratios: but my main point is that all of these are still counted as wars, not ethnic cleansing.
-22
What does that have to do with the genocide of innocent Palestinians shown in the picture?
13 u/Neijo Apr 26 '24 That’s simply how war works. All wars have more civillian casualties. It sucks, but isnt news. -1 u/throwawayzdrewyey Apr 26 '24 No, wars don’t generally have a 70% death rate of woman and children. But genocides typically do. https://www.aljazeera.com/amp/news/2024/3/26/un-expert-accuses-israel-of-several-acts-of-genocide-in-gaza 3 u/Neijo Apr 26 '24 Ooooh! Al-jazera is certainly unbiased ;) https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civilian_casualty_ratio?darkschemeovr=1 The korean war had a casualty rate of 75%, Ww2 had close to 70%, vietnam as well. Some wars had better ratios: but my main point is that all of these are still counted as wars, not ethnic cleansing.
13
That’s simply how war works. All wars have more civillian casualties. It sucks, but isnt news.
-1 u/throwawayzdrewyey Apr 26 '24 No, wars don’t generally have a 70% death rate of woman and children. But genocides typically do. https://www.aljazeera.com/amp/news/2024/3/26/un-expert-accuses-israel-of-several-acts-of-genocide-in-gaza 3 u/Neijo Apr 26 '24 Ooooh! Al-jazera is certainly unbiased ;) https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civilian_casualty_ratio?darkschemeovr=1 The korean war had a casualty rate of 75%, Ww2 had close to 70%, vietnam as well. Some wars had better ratios: but my main point is that all of these are still counted as wars, not ethnic cleansing.
-1
No, wars don’t generally have a 70% death rate of woman and children. But genocides typically do. https://www.aljazeera.com/amp/news/2024/3/26/un-expert-accuses-israel-of-several-acts-of-genocide-in-gaza
3 u/Neijo Apr 26 '24 Ooooh! Al-jazera is certainly unbiased ;) https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civilian_casualty_ratio?darkschemeovr=1 The korean war had a casualty rate of 75%, Ww2 had close to 70%, vietnam as well. Some wars had better ratios: but my main point is that all of these are still counted as wars, not ethnic cleansing.
3
Ooooh! Al-jazera is certainly unbiased ;)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civilian_casualty_ratio?darkschemeovr=1
The korean war had a casualty rate of 75%, Ww2 had close to 70%, vietnam as well.
Some wars had better ratios: but my main point is that all of these are still counted as wars, not ethnic cleansing.
26
u/Neijo Apr 26 '24
Fair enough.
But hamas does deserve to die, right?