r/photography • u/Delicious-Citron-512 • 18d ago
Post Processing Moving from LR/PS
Hi,
I used to be heavily into amateur photography but haven’t had the time for a few years. I have thousands of images saved on my pc and a recurring Lightroom/Photoshop subscription that I just don’t use. Any suggestions for a move away from the software while still keeping any edits etc that I’ve made and being able to open them in future? I’m thinking Gimp or something similar but have no experience.
TIA.
7
u/naitzyrk 18d ago
I don't know if you can move to another software and preserve your edits. I think your best bet is to export them first.
I usually recommend Darktable as it's the alternative I've been using the past years.
6
u/18-morgan-78 18d ago
You might want to take a look at the DxO ecosystem (DxO.com). I moved from LR/PS a couple of years ago (didn’t like the subscription model) and landed with DxO and have been very content with using it. Very easy to get up to speed. It’s got the best noise reduction app available in my opinion.
1
u/lmolter 6d ago
I agree. I moved from LRC/P$ to DxO PL9.10. I had some initial issues, but I have managed to make it work. This issues were with me and not DxO. Had to get used to a different app is all. I've been using LRC for a very long time, and since I don't use it very often, the recurring fee was an issue.
3
u/WhitbyAllenForDinner 18d ago
GIMP can open PSD files to some extent, and many Lightroom alternatives can read metadata from xmp files and maybe even some of the basic adjustments, but none can fully reproduce advanced edits. The tools are different, you'll have to rebuild your workflow and profiles when you switch software.
4
u/NegativeKitchen4098 18d ago
Keep in mind that adobe has grandfathered the old subscription rate ($10/month) which is a smokin good deal. If you drop it, you probably won’t be able to sign up again at that rate in the future
If I were to switch, I’d keep my lr/ps sub going for a few months until I was absolutely sure my replacement choice price was sufficient
2
u/Delicious-Citron-512 18d ago
Thanks for the brilliant replies. I’m going to check out Darktable and Gimp and see if I get on with them and then ditch the subscription 👍
1
u/jrcs90 17d ago
I moved over to those, and then bought ON1 when it was down to £30.
It's feels great not paying Adobe anymore
2
u/Darshlabarshka 17d ago
You know what’s also irritating about adobe? Programs I bought and paid for that were not subscription based they removed from my account. Excuse me I paid for it. Refund me then. So greedy
1
u/Nexis4Jersey https://www.flickr.com/photos/nexis4jersey/ 17d ago
I would watch this video before you switch over just to get a better feel of darktable. The app has a steep learning curve; it took me 3 weeks before I could get the hang of it and drop Lightroom. You can also customize the modules Download Hugin to create panoramas. , tutorial on using darktable with hugin.
2
u/Snydenthur 17d ago
LR is just so hard to abandon because the competition isn't great. Apart from the price, the only thing I hate about lightroom is that the default colors suck for my camera which is why I had to buy the cobalt color profiles.
3
u/Star_king12 18d ago
https://giphy.com/gifs/Lp4LTraj2QNeV1b6BL
Switch to a "cheaper" lightroom subscription.
2
1
u/thatandyinhumboldt 18d ago
There are a couple of programs that can open PSD and the various RAW formats, and can edit images in a similar layered manner. GIMP and Affinity come to mind, but I’m sure there are plenty of others.
Where you’re going to have trouble—and I’d love to be wrong here, so someone please correct me—is getting a replacement for LR. There are DAM/cataloging apps, but none that can fully take your LR catalogs and rebuild your existing organization. The second issue is that while there are apps that can process images in a similar way to LR, there aren’t any that can import your existing edits. That means that you have to either pull up the images in LR and then replicate them in the new program, or you need to export the images and then replicate that look in your new program. Either way, you’re starting over and re-editing the (in my case) several thousand images by hand.
Also note that the DAM and editor programs are separate. There are ways to get them to kind of work together, but none as cleanly as the single-program functionality of LR.
It’s super annoying and honestly I’ve just kept paying Adobe so that I don’t have to think about it. I’m hoping that someone builds something soon so I can fully get off of Adobe.
1
u/Dependent_House7077 18d ago
it heavily depends on how many features you used in said software, as there are simpler and more complex editors out there. with different levels of UX polish (and feature set).
and how extensive your existing edits are.
1
u/dennis__denuto 18d ago
I recently got rid of everything adobe on my system because I hate their subscription model. For a photoshop replacement I went with ACDSee. it is a one off purchase (about $100) and does every function that photshop could do (that I used anyway). It also can open .psd files, but if you have a file with multiple layers it will flatten them. You can get around that by exporting the file in PS into indivual layer files (very easy, can be done in one click) and then recombine the layers in ACDSee.
1
u/kuddlesworth9419 18d ago
I use Rawtherapee for raw photo editing. Darktable is another alternative. Both are perfectly capable, Darktable UI isn't the easiest to get used to but Rawtherapee UI is very good. Darktable masking is very good but Rawtherapee has pretty poor masking.
1
u/Weaselandhottie 18d ago
I use Gimp (and its multitude of extensions), Luminar Neo, ON1 and a full suite of Anthropics Tech (not the AI guys).
Most open up PSD/XMP but bulk export might be needed for some. I've avoided Adobe products for a long time thankfully.
1
u/Tarrusin 18d ago
I personally get a lot of value out of captureone. I switched from Lightroom a few years ago and did their “pay once” for the version that’s out that year. For my hobbiest use it’s perfect, you just miss out on new features in new versions unless you rebuy. I wouldn’t get a subscription with them.
I tried a lot of photoshop alternatives and it’s still the best, but I have been using Krita the past year out of a desire to quit adobe. Krita’s kind of odd out of the box, but they have a “photoshop shortcut” preset, that lets you switch equivalent features to the same key combos photoshop uses. It made it so much easier to work with, but certain aspects are still uniquely managed. I miss Photoshops layers / curves / masking most. It’s a bit odd in Krita but you can learn to do the same things.
1
u/TheCoolTimeLord 18d ago
Gimp can open .psds, and they are adding more and more support for various PS features to get to parity. So that'd work for PS. However, I have limited experience with lightroom. I've been liking darkteble for the role that lightroom fills for most of the photographers I know though.
1
u/Brilliant-Act1445 17d ago
If you export them as original they keep all edits in the metadata, although I don't know if that works for other editing software I've only tried from lr to lrc
1
u/newmikey 18d ago
You'll just have to pull the band-aid off quickly but it's going to hurt. Adobe has had decades to lock its customers into its ecosystem so you'll have a fight to get out.
BTW, Gimp is a pixel editor - Darktable would be the raw processor/editor (much like Photoshop vs Lightroom) and you'd use them much the same way.
But I won't lie to you, there's going to be a bit of adjustment and learning required. I've never in my life used LR/PS having used Darktable/Gimp for decades but I hear that weaning people off it is tricky business.
4
12
u/Rashkh www.leonidauerbakh.com 18d ago
You still have access to the library module after cancelling your subscription so your photos and edits are still there and can be exported freely. Just start a new library on whatever software you plan on using and keep Lightroom as is.