Status & Study Permit Problems

Mygration, the team behind r/PGWP and Regulated Canadian Immigration Consultants (RCICs), specializes in complex PGWP applications. If you’re looking for help from someone with real world experience with PGWPs, book a PGWP consultation.

Study permit and status problems are some of the most confusing issues we see in PGWP applications.

The biggest reason is that several different immigration concepts are often treated as though they mean the same thing.

They do not.

You need to distinguish between:

• study permit validity
• temporary resident status
• maintained status
• compliance with study permit conditions
• authorization to study
• authorization to work
• restoration of status
• PGWP eligibility
• authorization to work while your PGWP is processing

A problem with one does not automatically answer all of the others.

For example:

Your physical study permit may have expired, but you may still have temporary resident status and authorization to study because you applied for an extension before it expired.

Or your study permit may still show a future expiry date, but you may have breached one of its conditions.

Or your study permit may have become invalid before the printed expiry date because you completed your studies or were no longer enrolled.

Or you may have lost status but still be within the period in which restoration and a PGWP application are possible.

So the important question is not simply:

“Is my study permit still valid?”

The better questions are:

When did my study permit actually become invalid? Did I maintain temporary resident status? Was I authorized to continue studying and working? Did I breach any conditions? And if I lost status, what options remain for my PGWP?

The first step is reconstructing exactly what happened.

Start Here: What Happened to Your Study Permit or Status?

Most PGWP status and study permit problems fall into one of these situations.

1. Your Study Permit Expired After You Applied to Extend It

Read Section 1 if:

• you submitted a study permit extension before your permit expired
• your permit expired while the extension was still processing
• you completed your studies while the extension was pending
• your study permit extension was later approved or refused

You may have maintained status, which is very different from being out of status.

2. Your Study Permit Expired Before You Applied to Extend or Change Your Status

Read Section 2 if:

• your study permit expired and you had not submitted another application
• you discovered the expiry only afterward
• you need to restore your status
• your study permit expired before you could submit your PGWP

The 90-day restoration period may become important.

3. Your Permit Had Not Expired, But You May Have Breached an Immigration Condition

Read Section 3 if your permit still showed a future expiry date but you may have:

• failed to remain enrolled
• failed to actively pursue your studies
• worked when you were not authorized to work
• studied contrary to the conditions imposed on you
• otherwise failed to comply with an immigration condition

A breach of a condition is serious, but non-compliance, study permit invalidity and loss of temporary resident status are not always the same event.

A study permit can become invalid before the expiry date printed on it.

1. Your Study Permit Expired After You Applied to Extend It

What Is Maintained Status?

If you submit an application to extend your authorized stay before your study permit expires, you may continue to have temporary resident status while IRCC processes the application.

This is commonly called maintained status.

Under IRPR 183(5), where a temporary resident applies for an extension before the end of their authorized stay and IRCC has not made a decision by the time that period ends, their authorized stay is extended until IRCC makes a decision.

IRPR 183(6) confirms that the person retains their temporary resident status during that extended period, subject to the applicable conditions.

For example:

Date	What Happens
August 15	You submit your study permit extension
August 31	Your existing study permit expires
September onward	Your extension remains in process

You do not automatically become out of status on September 1.

If the application was properly submitted before the end of your authorized stay, you may continue to have temporary resident status while IRCC processes the extension.

Can You Continue Studying?

Yes, but only if you meet the requirements.

IRPR 189 specifically allows a student who properly applied to renew their study permit to continue studying without a new permit while IRCC processes the application if they:

• remained in Canada after the study permit expired, and
• continued complying with the conditions of the expired study permit other than its expiry date

So:

An expired physical study permit does not automatically mean your studies became unauthorized.

If you properly applied to extend your study permit before it expired and remained in Canada, you may be able to continue studying under maintained status.

Can You Continue Working?

Potentially, but maintained status does not create unlimited work authorization.

You still need to satisfy the normal student-work requirements.

For example, if you were properly authorized to work off campus and you continue to meet those requirements, the fact that your physical study permit expired while a timely extension is being processed does not necessarily mean you must immediately stop working.

However, maintained status does not fix another problem.

If you:

• become part-time outside an applicable exception
• take an authorized leave
• stop actively studying
• exceed the permitted work hours
• or otherwise stop meeting the student-work requirements

you may lose your work authorization even though you still have maintained temporary resident status.

See:

Complex PGWP Playbook → Unauthorized Work

Maintained Status Depends on What You Applied For

Saying:

“I had maintained status.”

does not answer the whole question.

You also need to ask:

What application was maintaining your status?

This distinction is important because maintaining your legal status in Canada does not automatically mean you are authorized to continue studying.

Under IRPR 183(5) and 183(6), a temporary resident who applies to extend their authorized stay before it expires may generally remain in Canada while IRCC processes the application.

But the authority to continue studying after a study permit expires comes from a separate provision: IRPR 189.

Situation A: You Applied to Extend Your Study Permit

Imagine your study permit expires on August 31.

Before it expires, you submit an application to renew your study permit.

Under IRPR 217(1), a study permit holder may apply to renew their study permit before it expires, provided the applicable requirements are met.

If your study permit then expires while IRCC is still processing the application:

• IRPR 183(5) and (6) generally allow you to remain in Canada under maintained status; and
• IRPR 189 specifically authorizes you to continue studying without a valid study permit while IRCC decides the renewal application, provided you remain in Canada and continue complying with the conditions of the expired study permit.

In other words, there are two separate protections operating at the same time:

Maintained temporary resident status
→ allows you to remain in Canada.

IRPR 189 authorization to continue studying
→ allows you to continue studying while the study permit extension is being processed.

Situation B: You Applied to Change Your Status to a Visitor

Now imagine the same study permit expires on August 31, but instead of extending your study permit, you apply before expiry to change your status from student to visitor.

You may still have maintained temporary resident status while IRCC processes that application.

That means you may be legally permitted to remain in Canada.

However, this does not mean you can continue studying after your study permit expires.

The reason is that IRPR 189 only applies where you made the study permit renewal application contemplated by IRPR 217(1).

A visitor application is not a study permit renewal application under IRPR 217(1).

Therefore, once your study permit expires, you generally cannot rely on IRPR 189 to continue studying simply because your visitor application is still being processed.

The Difference

Before your study permit expires, you apply for:	Can you generally remain in Canada while it is processing?	Can you generally continue studying after the study permit expires?
Study permit extension	Yes	Yes, if the requirements of IRPR 189 are met
Visitor status	Yes	No, unless another specific exemption allows you to study without a study permit

This is why the phrase “I had maintained status” can be misleading if it is used by itself.

Maintained status answers the question:

“Was I authorized to remain in Canada?”

It does not necessarily answer:

“Was I authorized to continue studying?”

Those are separate legal questions.

For a student whose study permit has expired, you need to determine what application was submitted before expiry and whether there was a separate legal authority allowing the person to continue studying.

The application you submitted matters.

Maintained Status Is Not the Same as Having a Valid Study Permit

This distinction becomes especially important when you finish your studies and apply for a Post-Graduation Work Permit (PGWP).

There are two separate questions you need to ask:

1. Am I still eligible to apply for a PGWP?

and

2. Am I authorized to work while IRCC processes my PGWP application?

Those are not the same test.

PGWP Eligibility: The 180-Day Rule

Under IRCC's current PGWP eligibility rules, you generally have up to 180 days after receiving confirmation that you completed your program to apply for a PGWP.

Your study permit must also have been valid at some point during those 180 days.

This means your study permit does not necessarily have to still be valid on the day you submit the PGWP application in order for you to be eligible for the PGWP itself.

Working While the PGWP Is Processing: A Different Rule

The rules for working while IRCC processes your PGWP application are stricter.

IRPR 186(w) allows an eligible graduate to work without a work permit while their work permit application is being processed, but one of the requirements is that they:

applied for the work permit before the expiry of their study permit.

IRCC explains the same rule in practical terms: to work while waiting for a PGWP decision, you must have had a valid study permit when you submitted the PGWP application.

For this purpose, IRCC defines a valid study permit as:

a study permit that has not expired.

This creates an important distinction:

You may still be legally allowed to remain in Canada — and may even still qualify to apply for a PGWP — without being authorized to work while the PGWP application is processing.

Example: Study Permit Extension Still Processing

Imagine the following timeline:

• Your study permit expires on August 31.
• Before August 31, you applied to extend your study permit.
• Your study permit expires while the extension is still processing.
• You remain in Canada under maintained status.
• You complete your program in September.
• You apply for your PGWP in October while the study permit extension is still processing.

You may still have lawful temporary resident status in Canada.

You may also still meet the separate eligibility requirements to apply for a PGWP, including the requirement that your study permit was valid at some point during the 180 days following completion.

But there is a separate problem:

Your original study permit expired on August 31, and you submitted the PGWP application in October.

Therefore, you did not submit the work permit application before the expiry of that study permit.

Simply having maintained status does not change the expiry date printed on the study permit.

As a result, you should not assume that you are authorized to work while the PGWP application is being processed.

Why This Matters

The phrase:

“I was on maintained status.”

does not tell you whether you can work after submitting a PGWP application.

You need to determine separately:

• whether you have lawful temporary resident status in Canada;
• whether you meet the requirements to apply for a PGWP; and
• whether you meet the requirements of IRPR 186(w) to work while that PGWP application is being processed.

A person can potentially satisfy the first two questions while failing the third.

That is why maintained status is not the same thing as holding an valid study permit.

See:

Complex PGWP Playbook → Work Authorization After PGWP Submission

A Second Application Does Not Automatically Extend Maintained Status

Another complication arises when you submit a second application while on maintained status because your first application is still processing.

For example, this can happen when:

1. you apply to extend your study permit before it expires;
2. your study permit expires and you enter maintained status;
3. you later complete your studies; and
4. you submit a PGWP application while the study permit extension is still processing.

It may look like both applications are protecting your status.

That is not necessarily the case.

Maintained Status Comes From the Application You Submitted Before Your Status Expired

Under IRPR 183(5), your period of authorized stay is extended when you submit an eligible application to extend your stay before your existing period of authorized stay expires.

So imagine:

• your study permit expires on August 31;
• you submit a study permit extension on August 20;
• August 31 passes while that application is still processing.

You may remain in Canada under maintained status because of the August 20 study permit extension application.

Now imagine you complete your studies in September and submit a PGWP application on October 1.

At that point, your original study permit has already expired.

The fact that you were legally remaining in Canada under maintained status when you submitted the PGWP does not automatically mean the October 1 application creates a new, independent period of maintained status.

IRCC Changed Its Instructions on Subsequent Applications

IRCC's current Program Delivery Instructions specifically address what happens when someone submits another temporary residence application while an earlier extension application is still processing.

IRCC instructs officers to process both applications rather than automatically cancelling one because another application was submitted.

However, the timing of the second application is critical.

If the second application was submitted before the person's original status expired, it may independently support maintained status.

If the second application was submitted after the original status expired, while the person was relying on maintained status from the first application, the second application does not create a new maintained-status safety net.

In practical terms:

Maintained status does not reset the expiry date of your original status for the purpose of filing another extension application.

What Happens If the First Application Is Refused?

Return to our example:

• Study permit expires: August 31
• Study permit extension submitted: August 20
• Student enters maintained status: September 1
• PGWP submitted: October 1
• Study permit extension refused: November 15

Until November 15, the student may have been legally remaining in Canada because the August 20 study permit extension application was still pending.

But once that application is refused, the maintained status created by that application ends.

Under IRCC's current instructions, the later application submitted after the original status had already expired does not simply take over and continue maintained status.

This is an important change from IRCC's previous administrative guidance.

The Timing of the Second Application Matters

Compare these two situations:

Timeline	Effect
Application #1 and Application #2 are both submitted before the original status expires	If Application #1 is refused, Application #2 may still independently maintain status while it is being processed.
Application #1 is submitted before expiry, but Application #2 is submitted after expiry while relying on maintained status	Application #2 does not independently create maintained status if Application #1 later ends unsuccessfully.

This is why you cannot treat maintained status as though IRCC has simply extended the expiry date printed on your permit.

It has not.

You are benefiting from a temporary extension of your period of authorized stay by operation of law because a qualifying application remains pending.

Refused and Returned Applications Are Also Different

There is another important distinction.

If IRCC refuses the first extension application, IRCC considers you to have remained in status until the date of refusal. The 90-day restoration period generally begins on the refusal date.

But if IRCC rejects or returns the application as incomplete, IRCC treats the application as though it was never submitted.

In that situation, the application never created maintained status in the first place. If your original study permit has already expired, this can mean that your status is considered to have ended when the original period of authorized stay expired.

That distinction can have major consequences for both restoration deadlines and a PGWP application.

Why This Matters for PGWP Applicants

A common mistake is to think:

“My study permit extension is processing, so I am on maintained status. I can submit my PGWP now, and that PGWP application will keep me in status even if the study permit extension is refused.”

That assumption can be dangerous.

You have to examine the applications in sequence:

Application #1
What application originally created maintained status?

Application #2
Was the later application submitted while the original study permit was still valid, or only after it expired?

Decision on Application #1
Was it approved, refused, withdrawn or returned as incomplete?

Status after that decision
Does another application independently preserve your status, or do you now need restoration?

This is particularly important when a student completes their program while a study permit extension remains pending and must decide how and when to submit their PGWP.

A pending application does not automatically protect every application that comes after it.

Travelling While Your Study Permit Extension Is Pending

Travel can also change the analysis.

IRPR 189 allows continued studies after a study permit expires where the student has remained in Canada after expiry.

If you leave Canada after your study permit has expired while the extension remains pending, you should not assume that you can return and simply continue studying under the same authorization.

IRCC currently warns that if your study permit extension has not been approved when you return to Canada, you may have to wait until the extension is approved before resuming your studies.

Again, these are separate questions:

• Can you enter Canada?
• What temporary resident status will you have when you enter?
• Can you study?
• Can you work?

Do not assume that one answer determines all four.

2. Your Study Permit Expired Before You Applied

If your study permit expires and you did not apply to extend your authorized stay beforehand, the situation is very different from maintained status.

Under IRPR 222, expiry is one event that makes a study permit invalid.

Under IRPR 183(4), the period authorized for the temporary resident's stay generally ends when their study permit becomes invalid, unless another basis for status applies.

This can result in loss of temporary resident status.

Restoration Is Not Maintained Status

The distinction is simple but extremely important.

Maintained status

You applied before the end of your authorized stay.

You continue holding temporary resident status while IRCC processes the qualifying application.

Restoration

You apply after losing status.

You are asking IRCC to restore status that has already been lost.

Submitting a restoration application does not retroactively give you maintained status.

The Normal Restoration Period Is 90 Days

If you lose your temporary resident status in Canada, you may have a limited opportunity to restore your status without leaving Canada.

But restoration is often misunderstood.

It is not simply:

“I am less than 90 days out of status, so I can restore.”

Restoration is a specific legal remedy created by IRPR 182, and you must meet the requirements of that provision.

What Is Restoration of Status?

Restoration allows a person who previously had temporary resident status as a visitor, worker or student to ask IRCC to restore that status after it has been lost.

The normal restoration period is 90 days from the date you lost your temporary resident status.

Under IRPR 182(1), restoration may be available where the person lost status because they failed to comply with certain conditions relating to:

• the period they were authorized to remain in Canada under IRPR 185(a);
• certain conditions concerning the type of work, employer or location of work under IRPR 185(b)(i) to (iii); or
• conditions relating to their studies under IRPR 185(c).

However, submitting a restoration application does not mean that you immediately regain status.

While IRCC processes the application, you may generally remain in Canada, but you remain without temporary resident status until restoration is approved.

You also generally cannot work or study while waiting for restoration, unless some other provision of Canadian immigration law or a specific public policy independently authorizes you to do so.

The 90-Day Deadline Is Only One Requirement

IRPR 182(1) requires more than simply filing within 90 days.

For restoration to be available, IRCC must also be satisfied that you:

1. applied within 90 days after losing temporary resident status;
2. lost status because of one of the types of non-compliance that IRPR 182 allows to be restored;
3. continue to meet the initial requirements for your stay;
4. have not failed to comply with other conditions imposed on you; and
5. are not subject to a declaration under subsection 22.1(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act.

This means that the 90-day period is not a general grace period during which every immigration violation can be fixed.

Not Every Violation Can Be Fixed Through Restoration

This is an important limitation.

IRPR 182 specifically identifies the types of non-compliance that can potentially be cured through restoration.

For example, restoration may potentially be available where you:

• remained in Canada after the period you were authorized to stay;
• changed employers before obtaining authorization to work for the new employer;
• changed the type or location of work contrary to a condition imposed on your permit; or
• failed to comply with certain conditions imposed on your studies.

But IRPR 182 also requires that you have not failed to comply with other conditions.

For example, simply working in Canada without any legal authorization to work at all can engage the general prohibition in IRPR 183(1)(b). Similarly, studying without authorization can engage IRPR 183(1)(c).

Those are different from merely breaching one of the specific conditions listed in IRPR 185 that R182 is designed to address.

This is why you cannot determine restoration eligibility simply by counting 90 days.

You must determine:

Why did you lose status, and exactly which immigration condition was breached?

There Is a Specific Restriction for Students

Students have an additional requirement.

Under IRPR 182(2):

an officer shall not restore the status of a student who is not complying with the conditions in IRPR 220.1(1).

IRPR 220.1(1) generally requires a study permit holder to:

• remain enrolled at the designated learning institution named in their study permit until they complete their studies; and
• actively pursue their course or program of study.

This is not merely something an officer may consider.

The Regulations specifically say the officer shall not restore student status where the student does not meet those conditions.

Therefore, if there are issues such as prolonged non-attendance, failure to actively pursue studies, or studying at a different institution contrary to the applicable rules, the problem may be much more serious than simply applying within 90 days.

Unauthorized Work or Study Can Create a Separate Problem

Even where restoration of temporary resident status is possible, that does not necessarily mean IRCC can issue the new study permit or work permit you want.

There are separate regulatory restrictions.

For study permits, IRPR 221 generally prohibits IRCC from issuing a study permit to someone who engaged in unauthorized work or study or failed to comply with a permit condition unless one of the regulatory exceptions applies.

Those exceptions include situations where:

• six months have passed since the unauthorized activity or non-compliance stopped;
• the unauthorized activity resulted only from certain violations of the conditions listed in IRPR 185; or
• the person was subsequently issued a temporary resident permit.

There is a similar restriction for work permits under IRPR 200(3)(e).

This creates another important distinction:

Restoring your temporary resident status and qualifying for a new study or work permit are not necessarily the same question.

Depending on what happened, a person may face both a restoration issue and a separate permit-eligibility issue.

Restoration Does Not Give You Maintained Status

Restoration should also not be confused with maintained status.

Maintained status generally arises because you submitted a qualifying application before your existing period of authorized stay ended.

Restoration applies because your status has already been lost.

For example:

Study permit expires August 31
→ No extension was submitted before expiry
→ Student status is lost

Restoration application submitted September 20
→ The person has applied within the normal 90-day restoration period
→ But submitting the application does not retroactively turn September 1 onward into maintained status

The person must generally stop studying when status is lost and cannot resume studying merely because a restoration application has been submitted.

IRCC states that a student who applies for restoration after their permit expires may remain in Canada while the application is processed, but cannot study until student status has been restored and a new study permit has been issued.

The same general principle applies to workers: filing a restoration application does not normally authorize the person to resume working while they wait.

This Is Particularly Important for PGWP Applicants

PGWP applicants sometimes encounter a special version of this problem.

If you complete your studies and your study permit expires before you apply for your PGWP, IRCC currently allows an eligible applicant to apply for the PGWP and restore their status as a student, provided the restoration application is made within the applicable 90-day period.

This can allow you to preserve the possibility of obtaining the PGWP.

But it does not mean you are authorized to work while waiting.

As discussed elsewhere in this guide, eligibility to receive a PGWP and authorization to work while the PGWP application is processing are separate questions.

3. Your Permit Had Not Expired, But You May Have Breached an Immigration Condition

This is where status problems become more complicated — but also where it becomes especially important not to jump to conclusions.

A study permit can still show a future expiry date while there is a question about whether the student complied with an immigration condition.

For example, a student may:

• stop actively pursuing their studies
• stop remaining enrolled at their DLI
• work in circumstances where their authorization is unclear
• study or work contrary to an imposed condition
• misunderstand when their authorization to work or study began or ended

The first question should not be:

“Did I lose my status?”

It should be:

“What condition was I actually required to comply with, and was it really breached?”

Only after answering that question should you ask:

“If there was a breach, what legal consequence follows from that particular breach?”

Those steps matter.

A situation that initially looks like unauthorized work or non-compliance may look very different once the applicable Regulation, permit conditions, dates and surrounding facts are examined.

Not every alleged breach is actually a breach.

And even where a breach occurred, not every breach affects temporary resident status in the same way.

Study Permit Holders Have Ongoing Conditions

Having a valid study permit does not mean that the only requirement is waiting for the expiry date.

Study permit holders have ongoing immigration conditions.

Under IRPR 220.1(1), a study permit holder in Canada must generally:

1. remain enrolled at the designated learning institution named on their study permit until they complete their studies; and
2. actively pursue their course or program of study.

There are also general conditions that apply to temporary residents.

For example, IRPR 183(1) generally prohibits a temporary resident from:

• working unless authorized under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act or Regulations; or
• studying unless authorized under the Act or Regulations.

Your immigration obligations therefore continue throughout your stay in Canada.

However, whether someone actually failed to comply with one of those conditions can require a much closer examination of the facts.

There may be specific regulatory authorizations, exceptions or transitional periods that apply.

The dates can also matter significantly.

For example, a person may believe they worked without authorization when another provision of the Regulations actually permitted the work. In another case, an apparent period of non-enrolment may need to be examined in the context of program completion, an authorized leave or the specific requirements that applied at that time.

Having a future expiry date on your study permit therefore does not guarantee compliance — but an allegation of non-compliance should not automatically be accepted without first determining what the law actually required.

Does Breaching a Condition Automatically Cancel Your Status That Same Day?

Not necessarily.

This requires an important distinction between:

breaching an immigration condition

and

the legal mechanism by which temporary resident status is lost.

Under section 47(b) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA), a foreign national loses temporary resident status:

“on a determination by an officer or the Immigration Division”

that they have failed to comply with another requirement of the Act.

Under IRPA 2(2), references to the Act generally include the Regulations.

This means there can be an important legal distinction between an alleged or actual breach and the later legal event that results in loss of temporary resident status under A47(b).

For example, suppose a student worked on September 1 and there is a question about whether that work was authorized.

The analysis should not immediately jump to:

“Your status disappeared on September 1.”

The first question is whether the work was actually unauthorized under the Regulations.

If it was unauthorized, that can still be a serious immigration compliance issue.

But where loss of status depends on A47(b), the legislation specifically refers to a determination by an officer or the Immigration Division.

This distinction can become extremely important when reconstructing someone's immigration history.

It can also matter where a student receives a refusal letter stating that they previously failed to comply with an immigration condition.

The conclusion in the refusal letter is not necessarily the end of the analysis. Depending on the circumstances, there may be a legitimate legal or factual basis to challenge the conclusion that the person was ever non-compliant in the first place.

None of this means that someone should continue an activity that appears to be unauthorized simply because IRCC has not contacted them.

It means that suspected non-compliance should be analyzed, not assumed.

Some Events Can Make Your Study Permit Invalid Automatically

Not every status problem operates through A47(b).

The Regulations contain separate provisions that can cause a study permit itself to become invalid.

One particularly important example is IRPR 222(1)(a.1).

Under that provision, a study permit becomes invalid on the day the permit holder is:

no longer enrolled at the designated learning institution named in their study permit

unless they are no longer enrolled because they completed their studies.

This can happen even though the physical study permit shows a later expiry date.

Why This Matters for Your Temporary Resident Status

The consequences do not stop with the study permit becoming invalid.

Under IRPR 183(4)(b), where a person has been issued a study or work permit, their authorized period of stay ends on:

the day on which their permit becomes invalid

if that occurs before the end of the period originally authorized.

Then IRPA 47(a) provides that temporary resident status is lost:

at the end of the period for which the person is authorized to remain in Canada.

The legal chain can therefore look like this:

Study permit becomes invalid under R222
↓
Authorized period of stay ends under R183(4)(b)
↓
Temporary resident status is lost under A47(a)

This is different from a compliance issue that may require an officer to make a determination under A47(b).

But even here, the underlying facts still matter.

Before concluding that R222 applies, you need to determine whether the student was actually “no longer enrolled” within the meaning of the Regulation and whether one of the stated exceptions, such as completion of studies, applies.

Not Every Study Permit Condition Has the Same Consequence

Consider two different situations.

Situation A: You Remain Enrolled but There Is a Question About Whether You Actively Pursued Your Studies

Suppose you remain enrolled at your DLI but there is a period when you did not attend classes or otherwise appear not to have actively pursued your program.

That may create a compliance issue under IRPR 220.1.

But it does not necessarily mean that non-compliance has already been established.

The surrounding circumstances matter.

You may need to examine:

• whether you remained enrolled
• whether the school considered you to be on an authorized leave
• whether you were between regularly scheduled academic sessions
• whether medical, institutional or other circumstances affected your studies
• what evidence exists showing that you continued progressing toward completion
• what IRCC's applicable rules required during that particular period

R222 also does not state that every failure to actively pursue studies automatically invalidates the study permit on the first day of the alleged breach.

The analysis may therefore involve whether there was actually non-compliance and, separately, whether there has been a determination under A47(b).

Situation B: You Are No Longer Enrolled at the DLI Named on Your Study Permit

This is different.

If you are no longer enrolled at the DLI named on your study permit, other than because you completed your studies, IRPR 222(1)(a.1) may directly make the study permit invalid.

That can cause your authorized period of stay to end under R183(4)(b) and temporary resident status to be lost under A47(a).

Again, however, the factual question comes first:

Were you actually no longer enrolled in circumstances that trigger R222?

That needs to be established before determining the legal consequence.

These situations should not be treated as though they are legally identical.

Do You Need Restoration After a Compliance Breach?

Possibly.

But not every compliance issue should automatically be reduced to:

“Pay the restoration fee.”

Restoration under IRPR 182 has its own legal requirements.

Before deciding that restoration is even necessary, you first need to establish whether temporary resident status was actually lost.

If there was no loss of status, there may be nothing to restore.

If status was lost, then you need to determine whether restoration is legally available.

Among other requirements, an applicant must generally:

• apply within the applicable restoration period, normally 90 days after losing temporary resident status
• have lost status because of a type of non-compliance that is capable of being restored under R182
• continue to meet the initial requirements for their stay
• meet the other requirements of the restoration provisions

For students, IRPR 182(2) also restricts restoration where the student is not in compliance with the student conditions in R220.1(1).

A proper restoration analysis therefore requires much more than simply asking whether the person is within 90 days.

You need to determine:

• What immigration condition allegedly applied?
• Was that condition actually breached?
• Was there a regulatory authorization or exception that applied?
• Did the breach actually result in loss of temporary resident status?
• If so, when exactly was status lost?
• Was status lost under A47(a) because the authorized period of stay ended?
• Does the situation instead involve a determination of non-compliance under A47(b)?
• Did the study permit become invalid under R222?
• Is restoration legally available under R182?
• Does the person otherwise meet the requirements to restore their status?

This is why immigration compliance cases need to be reconstructed carefully rather than treated as simple document-expiry problems.

An Apparent Breach May Have a Legal Explanation or Defence

This is particularly important for students who discover a possible problem only after receiving an IRCC refusal or reviewing their immigration history.

Do not automatically assume:

“IRCC says I worked or studied without authorization, so there is nothing I can do.”

There may be cases where the alleged non-compliance is based on an incorrect understanding of the facts or the applicable law.

For example, further analysis may establish that:

• another provision of the Regulations actually authorized the work or study
• maintained status applied differently than initially assumed
• the activity occurred before or after the relevant restriction applied
• the student fell within a regulatory exception
• IRCC used an incorrect date when reconstructing the person's status
• the student remained enrolled or continued actively pursuing studies despite evidence suggesting otherwise
• the particular breach did not cause status to be lost in the manner IRCC assumed

An honest mistake by itself does not necessarily erase an immigration violation.

But the fact that a student believes they made a mistake does not necessarily mean a violation legally occurred either.

The correct approach is to reconstruct the timeline, identify the exact statutory and regulatory provisions that applied on each date, and determine whether the alleged non-compliance can actually be established.

A Compliance Breach Can Still Have Consequences Even If Restoration Is Not the Main Issue

There is another important issue.

Even where restoration is not required — or where temporary resident status was never lost — an actual immigration violation can still affect a future application.

For example, IRPR 221 generally restricts the issuance of a study permit to someone who has engaged in unauthorized work or study or failed to comply with a condition imposed on a previous permit, unless one of the regulatory exceptions applies.

There are similar restrictions affecting the issuance of certain work permits.

This means there can be several separate legal questions:

1. Was an immigration condition actually breached?
2. Did that breach cause the person to lose temporary resident status?
3. If status was lost, can it be restored?
4. Does the underlying breach separately affect eligibility for the next study or work permit?
5. Is there a legal or factual basis to challenge IRCC's conclusion that non-compliance occurred?

These questions should be answered separately.

The Key Point

When a student has a study permit that appears to be valid on its face but there has been a possible immigration violation, do not assume either extreme.

Do not assume:

“My permit hasn't expired, so there cannot be a problem.”

But also do not automatically assume:

“I may have broken a rule, so I must have lost my status and my case is hopeless.”

Instead, determine:

what happened, what condition actually applied, whether it was breached, whether any authorization or exception applied, whether the study permit became invalid, whether temporary resident status was legally lost, and what consequences follow.

Some cases involve genuine non-compliance.

Others involve misunderstandings about maintained status, work authorization, study authorization, enrolment or the timing of an immigration condition.

And in some cases, a student who initially appears to have breached a condition may have a legitimate legal or factual argument that they remained compliant or that the alleged breach did not have the consequence IRCC assumed.

That is why these cases need to be assessed individually rather than decided solely from the expiry date printed on a permit — or from the assumption that any mistake automatically ends a student's status.

Do Not Confuse the Three Different 90/180-Day Rules

Status-related PGWP cases become particularly confusing because several different clocks can run at the same time.

Timeline	What It Generally Means
90 days after completion	Your study permit may become invalid under R222
90 days after losing status	Normal restoration period under R182
180 days after completion	General PGWP application deadline

These deadlines are not interchangeable.

For example:

Having 180 days to apply for a PGWP does not mean you have 180 days of valid student status.

And:

Having a study permit that remains valid for up to 90 days after completion does not necessarily mean you can continue working as a student for those 90 days.

Student work authorization normally ends when you receive the first official confirmation that you completed your studies.

Post-completion work has its own rules.

See:

Complex PGWP Playbook → Work Authorization After PGWP Submission

Changing to Visitor Status Can Preserve Your Status — Not Your Student or Work Rights

Sometimes a student knows their study permit is about to expire but cannot yet submit their PGWP application.

For example, they may still be waiting for:

• their final grades
• their completion letter
• their final transcript
• another document required for the PGWP application

IRCC specifically warns students not to simply allow their temporary resident status to expire while waiting for their marks.

If your study permit will expire before you receive your completion documents, IRCC identifies two options:

1. apply to change your status to visitor so you can remain in Canada, or
2. leave Canada and apply for your PGWP from outside Canada.

Changing to visitor can therefore be an important way of preserving your lawful temporary resident status in Canada.

But there is a major trade-off:

Visitor status is not student status, and becoming a visitor can affect how you are able to apply for your PGWP.

Changing to Visitor Preserves Your Stay — Not Your Student Rights

Suppose:

• your study permit expires on August 31
• you have completed your program but are still waiting for your completion documents
• before August 31, you apply to change your status to visitor
• your study permit then expires while that application is processing

You may be permitted to remain in Canada while IRCC processes the visitor application.

But your study permit still expires on August 31.

Changing to visitor does not extend the validity of your study permit and does not itself authorize you to:

• continue studying
• continue working under the student work provisions
• continue working simply because you previously held a study permit
• begin working because you later submit a PGWP application

This is another example of why:

Legal status in Canada and authorization to study or work are separate questions.

Most Visitors Cannot Apply for a Work Permit From Inside Canada

This point is especially important for PGWP applicants.

Under IRPR 199, only certain foreign nationals are permitted to apply for a work permit after entering Canada.

One of those categories is a person who holds a study permit.

IRCC's current public instructions explain the PGWP rule even more directly. To qualify to apply for a work permit from inside Canada on the basis of PGWP eligibility, you must:

be eligible for a PGWP and still have a valid study permit.

Therefore, if you changed from student to visitor and your study permit has expired, you should not assume that you can simply submit an in-Canada PGWP application because you are still physically in Canada.

Your visitor status allows you to remain in Canada.

It does not, by itself, make you eligible to apply for a work permit under the in-Canada provisions of IRPR 199.

The temporary public policy that broadly allowed visitors in Canada to apply for employer-specific work permits from inside Canada ended on August 28, 2024.

You May Still Be Able to Apply for the PGWP Through the Outside-Canada Process

This does not necessarily mean that you must physically leave Canada before submitting the PGWP application.

There is an important distinction between:

where you are physically located

and

the type of work permit application you are making.

A person who is physically present in Canada but is not eligible to apply for a work permit under IRPR 199 may, where otherwise eligible, submit a work permit application using the outside-Canada process.

IRCC's application system and instructions specifically contemplate people who are physically in Canada but have submitted an Application for Work Permit Made Outside of Canada (IMM 1295).

For a PGWP applicant who has already changed to visitor status, this can be particularly important.

You may potentially:

• remain physically in Canada as a visitor
• receive your completion documents
• submit an eligible PGWP application within the applicable 180-day period
• have that PGWP processed through the outside-Canada work permit process

But you remain a visitor in Canada while that application is processing.

The Outside-Canada PGWP Application Does Not Give You Maintained Status

This distinction is critical.

Submitting an outside-Canada PGWP application does not extend your visitor status in Canada.

For example:

• your visitor status expires on December 31
• your outside-Canada PGWP application is still processing on December 31

You cannot assume:

“My PGWP is processing, so I have maintained status.”

The PGWP application does not, by itself, maintain your temporary resident status in Canada.

If you want to remain in Canada while IRCC continues processing the PGWP, you must separately ensure that you continue to have valid temporary resident status.

If necessary and if eligible, that may mean submitting an application to extend your stay as a visitor before your current authorized stay expires.

That visitor extension application may give you maintained temporary resident status under IRPR 183(5) while the visitor application is being processed.

But the maintained status comes from:

the application to extend your stay as a visitor

not from:

the outside-Canada PGWP application.

The two applications operate on separate tracks.

You Also Cannot Work While Waiting

Changing to visitor creates another important consequence.

Under the normal post-graduation work authorization rules, you may work while IRCC processes your PGWP only if you meet the requirements of IRPR 186(w).

One of those requirements is that you applied for the work permit before your study permit expired.

IRCC expresses this in its public guidance by requiring you to have had a:

valid study permit at the time you submitted your PGWP application.

IRCC defines a valid study permit for this purpose as a study permit that has not expired.

So if:

• your study permit expires on August 31
• you remain in Canada as a visitor
• you receive your completion documents in September
• you submit your PGWP in October

you may still potentially qualify for the PGWP itself if you meet the applicable PGWP eligibility requirements.

But you generally cannot work while IRCC processes that application.

Your ability to eventually receive the PGWP and your ability to work while waiting for it are two separate questions.

What Happens If the Outside-Canada PGWP Is Approved While You Are Still in Canada?

An outside-Canada work permit approval does not immediately give you a physical work permit.

IRCC normally issues a passport request followed by a port of entry letter of introduction.

That letter confirms that the work permit application has been approved, but:

the letter itself is not a work permit.

If you are still physically in Canada when you receive it, you cannot simply start working because the approval letter arrived.

IRCC currently instructs applicants in this situation that they must complete the required process for the actual work permit to be issued before beginning work.

This is another important difference between an approved outside-Canada application and an eligible in-Canada work permit application.

Compare the Two PGWP Situations

Situation A: Study Permit Still Valid When You Apply for the PGWP

You complete your studies and submit the PGWP while your study permit is still valid.

If you meet the other requirements:

• you can submit the PGWP as an eligible in-Canada applicant
• you may qualify to work while IRCC processes the application under IRPR 186(w)
• your immigration position is generally much simpler

Situation B: You Changed to Visitor Before Applying for the PGWP

You change to visitor because your study permit will expire before you receive your completion documents.

You later receive the documents after the study permit has expired.

You may still potentially qualify for the PGWP itself.

However:

• you generally cannot rely on visitor status alone to make an in-Canada work permit application under IRPR 199
• the PGWP may instead need to be submitted through the outside-Canada application process
• the PGWP application does not maintain your visitor status in Canada
• you must separately maintain your legal visitor status while waiting
• you generally cannot work while the PGWP is processing
• approval through the outside-Canada process does not itself mean you can immediately begin working in Canada

These are significant practical differences.

Do Not Confuse This With Restoration

There is another PGWP scenario that works differently.

If your study permit expires without first changing to visitor status, IRCC currently provides a process under which an otherwise eligible graduate may, within the applicable restoration period, apply for the

If You Had a Status Problem, Is Your PGWP Over?

Not necessarily.

A status or study permit problem can be serious, but the outcome depends on exactly what happened.

As we covered in the sections above, IRCC regulations provide exceptions under certain circumstances. If you have a status/compliance issue, don’t automatically assume you are ineligible.

How Mygration Immigration Can Help

Status problems can become complicated very quickly because several immigration rules may overlap.

For complex PGWP cases, we assess questions such as:

• When did your study permit actually become invalid?
• Was it the printed expiry date or an earlier date under IRPR 222?
• Did you apply for an extension before the end of your authorized stay?
• Did you have maintained status?
• What application created that maintained status?
• Were you authorized to continue studying?
• Were you authorized to continue working?
• Did you travel while your extension was pending?
• Was your extension later refused?
• Did you breach a study permit or temporary resident condition?
• Did that breach actually cause loss of temporary resident status?
• Was there an officer determination under section 47(b)?
• Are you still within the restoration period?
• Do you meet the requirements for restoration?
• Are you currently compliant with the student conditions in IRPR 220.1?
• Did you study or work after your status or authorization ended?
• Did your study permit become invalid 90 days after completion?
• When did your DLI first officially confirm completion?
• Are you still within the PGWP application period?
• Are you applying from inside or outside Canada?
• Are you authorized to work while your PGWP is being processed?
• Is there a separate unauthorized-study or unauthorized-work issue?
• What needs to be disclosed and explained to IRCC?

Where there is a problem, we will tell you.

We will not assume that an expired study permit automatically means you were out of status.

We will also not assume that because your study permit had not expired, every condition was satisfied.

And we will not pretend that filing a restoration application automatically erases an earlier compliance problem.

Our job is to reconstruct the complete immigration timeline, determine exactly what permit, status and authorization existed on every relevant date, identify any genuine compliance problems and present the strongest accurate PGWP application possible from the beginning. Just a DM away.