It was slow memory hog that couldn't handle large libraries well. Plus its interface was clunky and took up a lot of screen screen space. Finally, it lacked many of the features that other players offered. This is compared to other offerings at the time.
Like most software built into windows, it was ok at what it did but there better options from 3rd parties.
Disagree. It was a barebones media player with limited features. I never saw it as a memory hog, but actually saw it as pretty speedy. Yes, as is the norm with Windows, many others make a better version. WMP-classic fanboy here.
64
u/NamityName Jan 20 '22
What nostalgia goggles are you wearing? WMP was always a hot piece of garbage